Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General

HSB 160Murió al terminar la sesión · 14 de febrero de 2023

HSB 160

Temas:Health care

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado14 de febrero de 2023
  2. Hecho: Subcomité14 de febrero de 2023
  3. Se detuvo: Comité de la CámaraMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  4. Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
  5. Sigue: Comité del Senado
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2024 terminó el 19 de abril de 2024, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA When doctors or hospitals discuss mistakes that caused harm, they must show patients the details of their insurance coverage. If an insurance company refuses to pay an agreed-upon amount that falls within those coverage limits, that refusal can be used as evidence in future legal cases. This rule is meant to help determine if an insurance company acted in bad faith. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to compensation discussions regarding adverse health care incidents. Under Code chapter 135P, a health care provider, a health facility, or a health care provider jointly with a health facility, may engage in an open, confidential discussion with a patient related to an adverse health care incident. The bill provides that if a health care provider or health facility makes an offer of compensation, the health care provider or health facility shall provide the patient with the contents of any insurance agreement under which any person carrying on an insurance business may be liable to satisfy a judgment. If at the end of the discussion, the patient and health care provider or health facility have reached an agreement for an amount equal to or less than that of the insurance policy limits, then the insurance carrier has days to respond in writing to the agreed-upon demand. _____ subsequent action against the insurance carrier for bad faith. The bill provides that if the discussion contents become discoverable, there shall be a rebuttable presumption of bad faith against the insurance carrier and in favor of the health care provider or health facility. Any subsequent verdict amount against the insurance carrier for bad faith cannot be used to increase the premium charged to the health care provider, health facility, or health care industry as a whole.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)2

House subcommittee

Named February 14, 2023. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§135P.5

Cómo funciona el Código3

Cabildeo

0 a favor · 5 en contra · 16 indecisos · Quiénes →