Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado9 de febrero de 2023
  2. Hecho: Subcomité9 de febrero de 2023
  3. Hecho: Comité de la Cámara28 de febrero de 2023
  4. Se saltó: Lo aprueba la CámaraSigue como HF 553
  5. Sigue: Comité del Senado
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Ahora es HF 553 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a HF 553 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA New rules would make digital records and contracts created with blockchain technology just as legal as paper ones. Companies that use specific, high-quality cybersecurity programs to protect your personal information would have a legal defense if they are sued after a data breach. These companies must constantly check for threats and follow recognized security standards to qualify for this protection. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to the use of certain technology. The bill provides that a record, signature, or contract shall not be denied legal effect because it is created or stored by means of distributed ledger technology or a smart contract, as those terms are defined in the bill. The bill provides that the ownership of the secure information remains with the original owner of the information, not the distributed ledger technology owner, unless specifically provided otherwise. The bill creates affirmative defenses for entities using cybersecurity programs. The bill provides that a covered entity seeking an affirmative defense must use a cybersecurity program for the protection of personal information and restricted information and the cybersecurity program must reasonably conform to an industry-recognized cybersecurity framework. A cybersecurity program must continually evaluate and mitigate reasonably anticipated threats, periodically evaluate the maximum probable loss attainable from a data breach, and communicate to affected parties the risk posed and actions the affected parties could take to reduce damages if a data breach has occurred. _____ cybersecurity program is appropriate if the cost to operate the program is no less than the covered entity’s maximum probable loss value. A covered entity that satisfies these requirements and that reasonably conforms to an industry-recognized cybersecurity framework is entitled to an affirmative defense to a tort claim that alleges that the failure to implement reasonable information security controls resulted in a data breach concerning personal information or restricted information. The bill details industry-recognized cybersecurity frameworks that the covered entity may follow and reasonably comply with in order to qualify for the affirmative defense. The bill does not provide a private right of action, including a class action.

Cambiado después por las enmiendas S-3155, H-1071; vea Enmiendas.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse2

House subcommittee

Named February 9, 2023. On February 21, 2023 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 3-0.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§554E.5

Modifica§554E.1§554E.2§554E.3§554E.4

Cómo funciona el Código3

Cabildeo

4 a favor · 2 en contra · 42 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.

  • HSB 555 HSB 555
    89th General Assembly · Approved by committee · nearly identical
    Cleared committee

Matched by wording or an identical title.