Bills › 90th General Assembly

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 9, 2023
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 9, 2023
  3. Done: House committeeFebruary 28, 2023
  4. Skipped: Passes the HouseContinued as HF 553
  5. Next: Senate committee
  6. Next: Passes the Senate
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Became HF 553 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to HF 553 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary New rules would make digital records and contracts created with blockchain technology just as legal as paper ones. Companies that use specific, high-quality cybersecurity programs to protect your personal information would have a legal defense if they are sued after a data breach. These companies must constantly check for threats and follow recognized security standards to qualify for this protection.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to the use of certain technology. The bill provides that a record, signature, or contract shall not be denied legal effect because it is created or stored by means of distributed ledger technology or a smart contract, as those terms are defined in the bill. The bill provides that the ownership of the secure information remains with the original owner of the information, not the distributed ledger technology owner, unless specifically provided otherwise. The bill creates affirmative defenses for entities using cybersecurity programs. The bill provides that a covered entity seeking an affirmative defense must use a cybersecurity program for the protection of personal information and restricted information and the cybersecurity program must reasonably conform to an industry-recognized cybersecurity framework. A cybersecurity program must continually evaluate and mitigate reasonably anticipated threats, periodically evaluate the maximum probable loss attainable from a data breach, and communicate to affected parties the risk posed and actions the affected parties could take to reduce damages if a data breach has occurred. _____ cybersecurity program is appropriate if the cost to operate the program is no less than the covered entity’s maximum probable loss value. A covered entity that satisfies these requirements and that reasonably conforms to an industry-recognized cybersecurity framework is entitled to an affirmative defense to a tort claim that alleges that the failure to implement reasonable information security controls resulted in a data breach concerning personal information or restricted information. The bill details industry-recognized cybersecurity frameworks that the covered entity may follow and reasonably comply with in order to qualify for the affirmative defense. The bill does not provide a private right of action, including a class action.

Changed since by amendments S-3155, H-1071; see Amendments.

Full bill text · What changed before it passed2

House subcommittee

Named February 9, 2023. On February 21, 2023 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 3-0.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§554E.5

Amends§554E.1§554E.2§554E.3§554E.4

How the Code works3

Lobbying

4 for · 2 against · 42 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.

  • HSB 555 HSB 555
    89th General Assembly · Approved by committee · nearly identical
    Cleared committee

Matched by wording or an identical title.