Bills › 90th General Assembly

HF 626Signed by Governor · May 8, 2024

Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit plans, and utilization review organizations, and including applicability provisions

Sponsored by the House Commerce Committee

Topics:Health careInsurance

Same legislation: SF 86, HF 96

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 17, 2023
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 26, 2023
  3. Done: House committeeMarch 2, 2023
  4. Done: Passes the HouseMarch 9, 202396–0
  5. Done: Senate committeeJanuary 30, 2024
  6. Done: Passes the SenateApril 16, 202448–0
  7. Done: To the GovernorApril 23, 2024
  8. Done: Signed into lawMay 8, 2024

Signed into law What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary Health insurance companies cannot suddenly stop covering a prescription drug or make it more expensive if a person is medically stable on that medicine and a doctor has prescribed it recently. Patients and doctors can request an exemption if coverage is changed, and insurance companies must respond to these requests very quickly. If a request for coverage is denied, the person has the right to appeal that decision.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to the continuity of care for a covered person and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit plans, and utilization review organizations. The bill provides that during a covered person’s eligibility under a health benefit plan, a health plan carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization shall not limit or exclude coverage of a prescription drug for the covered person if the covered person is medically stable on the drug as determined by the prescribing health care professional, the drug was previously approved by the health carrier for coverage for the person, and the covered person’s prescribing health care professional has prescribed the drug for the person’s medical condition within the previous six months. The bill includes, as prohibited limitations or exclusions, reducing the maximum coverage of prescription drug benefits, increasing cost sharing for a covered drug, moving a drug to a more restrictive tier, and removing a drug from a formulary. A prescription drug may, however, be removed from a formulary if the United States food and drug administration issues a statement regarding the clinical safety of the drug, or the manufacturer of the drug notifies the United States food and drug administration of a manufacturing discontinuance or potential discontinuance of the drug as required by section 506c of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The bill shall not be construed to prohibit a substitution, a formulary change, or a preference by a health carrier for a prescribed drug product that has the same generic name and demonstrated bioavailability, or that is an interchangeable biological product. “Health benefit plan”, “health carrier”, and “utilization review organization” are defined in the bill. The bill requires a covered person and prescribing health care professional to have access to a process to request a coverage exemption determination. The bill defines “coverage exemption determination” as a determination made by a health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization whether to cover a prescription drug that is otherwise excluded from coverage. A coverage exemption determination request must be approved or denied by the health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization within five calendar days, or within hours if exigent circumstances exist. If a determination is not received within the applicable time period the coverage exemption is deemed granted. The bill requires a coverage exemption to be expeditiously granted for a health benefit plan that is discontinued for the next plan year if a covered person enrolls in a comparable plan offered by the same health carrier, and in comparison to the discontinued health benefit plan, the new health benefit plan limits or reduces the maximum coverage for a prescription drug, increases cost sharing for the prescription drug, moves the prescription drug to a more restrictive tier, or excludes the prescription drug from the formulary. If a coverage exemption is granted, the bill requires an authorization of coverage that is no more restrictive than that offered in the discontinued health benefit plan, or than that offered prior to implementation of restrictive changes to the health benefit plan’s formulary after the current plan year began. If a determination is made to deny a request for a coverage exemption, the reason for denial and the procedure to appeal the denial must be provided to the requestor. Any determination to deny a coverage exemption may be appealed to the health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization. A determination to uphold or reverse denial of a coverage exemption must be made within five calendar days of receipt of an appeal, or within hours if exigent circumstances exist. If a determination is not made within the applicable time period, the denial is deemed reversed and the coverage exemption is deemed approved. If a determination to deny a coverage exemption is upheld on appeal, the reason for upholding the denial and the procedure to request external review of the denial pursuant to Code chapter 514J must be provided to the individual who filed the appeal. Any denial of a request for a coverage exemption that is upheld on appeal is considered a final adverse determination for purposes of Code chapter 514J and is eligible for a request for external review by a covered person or the covered person’s authorized representative pursuant to Code chapter 514J. The bill shall not be construed to prevent a health care professional from prescribing another drug covered by the health carrier that the health care professional deems medically necessary for the covered person. The bill shall not be construed to prevent a health carrier from adding a drug to its formulary, or from removing a drug from its formulary if the drug manufacturer removes the drug for sale in the United States. The bill allows the commissioner to take any necessary enforcement action under the commissioner’s authority to enforce compliance with the bill. The bill is applicable to health benefit plans that are delivered, issued for delivery, continued, or renewed in this state on or after January 1, 2024.

Changed since by amendments S-5159, H-1068; see Amendments.

Full bill text · What changed before it passed2

Senate subcommittee

Named January 17, 2024. On January 29, 2024 it recommended passage. [].

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

6 written public comments to its subcommittee: January 29, 2024 (3), February 1, 2023 (1), January 26, 2023 (2) · on the Legislature’s site

Fiscal note

Cost: up to $1.7M Compare with other bills

AI summary This bill prohibits health insurance carriers from limiting or excluding coverage for certain prescription drugs for medically stable people who have been using them for at least six months. It is estimated to increase the annual cost to the State of Iowa Plan and the Board of Regents insurance plans by between $203,000 and $1,673,000 beginning in fiscal year 2025.3

Read the fiscal note

Description

House File 626 relates to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers (carriers), health benefit plans (plans), and utilization review organizations (utilization reviews) and does the following:

  • Defines terms.
  • Prohibits limiting or excluding the coverage of a prescription drug (prescription) for a medically stable (stable) covered person on such drug, if all of the following apply:
  • The prescription was previously approved by the carrier for the covered person.
  • The covered person’s prescribing health care professional (prescriber) has prescribed the drug for the covered person’s medical condition within the previous six months.
  • The covered person continues to be an enrollee of the plan.
  • Coverage as described in the previous bullet point and subpoints is required to continue through the last day of the covered person’s plan eligibility or through the last day of the plan year, whichever is earlier.
  • Clarifies that limitations and exclusions of coverage referred to in the Bill include the following:
  • Limiting or reducing the maximum coverage for a covered prescription.
  • Increasing cost sharing for a covered prescription.
  • Moving a prescription to a more restrictive tier if the carrier uses a formulary with tiers.
  • Removing a prescription from a formulary, with exceptions permitted for clinical safety concerns by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and for manufacturer discontinuance of the prescription.
  • Clarifies that the Bill does not prohibit a substitution, formulary change, or preference by a carrier for a prescription that has the same generic name and demonstrated bioavailability, or that is an interchangeable biological product.
  • Clarifies that the Bill is not to prohibit a health care professional from prescribing another prescription drug covered by the carrier that the health care professional deems medically necessary.
  • Permits the Commissioner of Insurance to enforce compliance with the Bill.
  • Establishes applicability of the Bill beginning January 1, 2025.

Background

“Nonmedical switching” refers to the practice of switching a stable patient’s medication for reasons unrelated to the patient’s health. The practice may also be referred to as “formulary-driven switching,” “therapeutic switching,” or simply “switching.”

“Bioavailability” refers to the proportion of a drug that enters the circulation when introduced into the body and is, therefore, able to have an active effect. Without bioavailability, the drug will not take effect.

“Interchangeable biological product” refers to a biosimilar product that meets additional FDA requirements. These additional requirements are outlined by the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act at the federal level. The requirements include showing that an interchangeable product is expected to produce the same clinical results as the reference product for any given patient. Additionally, for products administered to patients more than once, the risk in terms of safety and reduced efficacy of multiple switches between an interchangeable product and a reference product must be evaluated by the FDA. “Biosimilar” means a biological product that is highly similar to, and has no clinically meaningful differences from, an existing FDA-approved reference product. “No clinically meaningful difference” applies to product safety, purity, and potency (safety and effectiveness). Biosimilar drugs must pass tests by the FDA to receive this label.

House File 626 is estimated to impact approximately 25.2% of the population (807,000). This includes individual coverage, fully insured small and large employer groups, self-insured public employees, and the State of Iowa Plan.

Of the individuals not covered by the mandate, approximately 47.9% are covered by government-sponsored health insurance, 23.0% are covered by employer coverage that is governed by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), and the remaining 3.9% are uninsured. Additional details are presented in Figure 1. Figure 1 — Population Covered by Insurance Plans Regulated by Iowa Law

Assumptions

  • The number of health insurance members covered by the Board of Regents and the State of Iowa Plan will remain at current levels.Type of Coverage

Iowa

Population

Percent of

Population

Total Population 2022 3,200,517 100.0%

Included in Mandate

Individual Coverage 102,399 3.2% Fully Insured Small Employer Group 140,349 4.4% Fully Insured Large Employer Group 294,013 9.2% Self-Insured Public Employees 215,000 6.7% State of Iowa Plan 55,000 1.7% Total 806,761 25.2%

Not Included in Mandate

Employer (self-insured + other types not listed) 736,868 23.0% Uninsured 126,000 3.9% Other Public (Military, Tricare, Veterans Affairs) 21,600 0.7% Medicare 658,382 20.6% Medicaid + Children’s Health Insurance Plan 850,906 26.6% Total 2,393,756 74.8% Source: Iow a Insurance Division, Department of Insurance and Financial Services, and Wellmark

  • Formulary management provisions of the Bill will impact a carrier’s ability to manage care, causing prescription costs to increase from 0.1% to 0.7%, based on the Milliman Frozen Formularies Report.
  • According to the Department of Administrative Services (DAS), there will be no increase in administrative cost for the DAS to administer the State of Iowa Plan.
  • According to Wellmark, there will not be an increase in administrative costs charged to the State of Iowa Plan as a result of this Bill.

Fiscal Impact

House File 626 is estimated to increase the annual cost to the State of Iowa Insurance Plan and the Board of Regents Insurance Plans between $203,000 and $1.7 million, as shown in Figure 2, beginning in FY 2025.

Figure 2 — Annual Fiscal Impact Summary

Sources

  • Board of Regents
  • Department of Administrative Services
  • Iowa Insurance Division
  • Milliman Frozen Formularies Report
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
  • Wellmark
  • Legislative Services Agency

Reading a fiscal note4

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§514F.9

How the Code works5

Lobbying

24 for · 7 against · 16 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in 2 earlier General Assemblies. None got through a chamber.

  • HF 372 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    89th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 656 · same title
    Cleared committee
  • HF 656 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    89th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 2199 · same title
    Cleared committee
  • HF 2199 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    89th General Assembly · Approved by committee · very similar
    Cleared committee
  • SF 178 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    89th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage · very similar
    Cleared committee
  • SF 2016 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    89th General Assembly · In committee · very similar
    Cleared committee
  • HF 2089 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    88th General Assembly · Approved by committee · same title
    Cleared committee
  • HF 2423 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    88th General Assembly · Approved by committee · very similar
    Cleared committee
  • HF 204 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    88th General Assembly · In committee · very similar
    Cleared committee

Matched by wording or an identical title.