Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General

HF 553Firmado por gobernador(a) · 3 de mayo de 2023

Relating to affirmative defenses for entities using cybersecurity programs

Presentado por el comité Economic Growth and Technology de la Cámara

Temas:Technology & privacy

La misma legislación: SSB 1095, HSB 154, SF 495

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado9 de febrero de 2023
  2. Hecho: Subcomité9 de febrero de 2023
  3. Hecho: Comité de la Cámara28 de febrero de 2023
  4. Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara15 de marzo de 202397–0
  5. Hecho: Comité del Senado30 de marzo de 2023
  6. Hecho: Lo aprueba el Senado19 de abril de 202350–0
  7. Hecho: A gobernador(a)3 de mayo de 2023
  8. Hecho: Firmado como ley3 de mayo de 2023

Firmado como ley ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA Companies that use specific, industry-standard cybersecurity programs to protect private information can defend themselves in court if they suffer a data breach. To qualify, these businesses must constantly check for threats, estimate potential losses, and tell people how to protect themselves if a breach happens. This protection applies to lawsuits claiming the company failed to use proper security controls, but it does not allow individuals to start new types of lawsuits or class actions. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill creates affirmative defenses for entities using cybersecurity programs. The bill provides that a covered entity seeking an affirmative defense must use a cybersecurity program for the protection of personal information and restricted information and the cybersecurity program must reasonably conform to an industry-recognized cybersecurity framework. A cybersecurity program must continually evaluate and mitigate reasonably anticipated threats, periodically evaluate the maximum probable loss attainable from a data breach, and communicate to affected parties the risk posed and actions the affected parties could take to reduce damages if a data breach has occurred. The scale and scope of a cybersecurity program is appropriate if the cost to operate the program is no less than the covered entity’s maximum probable loss value. A covered entity that satisfies these requirements and that reasonably conforms to an industry-recognized cybersecurity framework is entitled to an affirmative defense to a tort claim that alleges that the failure to implement reasonable information security controls resulted in a data breach concerning personal information or restricted information. The bill details industry-recognized cybersecurity frameworks that the covered entity may follow and reasonably comply with in order to qualify for the affirmative defense. The bill does not provide a private right of action, including a class action.

Cambiado después por las enmiendas S-3155, H-1071; vea Enmiendas.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse2

House subcommittee

Named February 9, 2023 (as HSB 154). On February 21, 2023 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 3-0.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§554G.1§554G.2§554G.3§554G.4

Cómo funciona el Código3

Cabildeo

4 a favor · 2 en contra · 42 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None became law, though one got through a chamber.

  • HF 2302 Relating to affirmative defenses for entities using cybersecurity programs
    89th General Assembly · Passed House · same title
    Passed a chamber
  • HSB 555 HSB 555
    89th General Assembly · Approved by committee · nearly identical
    Cleared committee

Matched by wording or an identical title.