Bills › 90th General Assembly

Relating to the inclusion of the value of child restraint systems in the partial loss calculation for specified insurance settlements of first-party automobile partial losses and including applicability provisions

Topics:Business & economy

Same legislation: HF 499

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 15, 2023
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 16, 2023
  3. Done: House committeeFebruary 23, 2023
  4. Skipped: Passes the HouseContinued as HF 499
  5. Next: Senate committee
  6. Next: Passes the Senate
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Became HF 499 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to HF 499 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary When an insurance company pays for partial damage to a car, they must now include the value of any child car seats or booster seats found inside. This rule applies to cars designed to carry nine people or fewer. It ensures that the cost of these safety seats is part of the insurance settlement.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to the inclusion of the value of child restraint systems in the partial loss calculation for insurance settlements of first-party automobile partial losses. The bill requires a person to include the value of any child restraint systems that are located in an automobile at the time the automobile is subject to a partial loss. “Automobile” is defined in the bill as a motor vehicle designed primarily for carrying nine passengers or less, excluding motorcycles and motorized bicycles. 213. The bill applies to first-party automobile partial losses for automobiles that are subject to a partial loss occurring on or after July 1, 2023.

Full bill text2

House subcommittee

Named February 16, 2023. On February 22, 2023 it recommended amendment and passage. Vote Total: 2-0.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§507B.4D

How the Code works3

Lobbying

2 for · 0 against · 9 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in 2 earlier General Assemblies. None got through a chamber.

  • HF 2145 Relating to the inclusion of the value of child restraint systems in the partial loss calc…
    89th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage · same title
    Cleared committee
  • HF 164 Relating to the inclusion of the value of child restraint systems in the partial loss calc…
    89th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage · nearly identical
    Cleared committee
  • HF 2055 Relating to the inclusion of the value of child restraint systems in the partial loss calc…
    88th General Assembly · Approved by committee · nearly identical
    Cleared committee

Similar bills this General Assembly

  • SF 215 Relating to the inclusion of the value of child restraint systems in the loss calculation …
    91st General Assembly · In committee
    Nearly identical

Matched by wording or an identical title.