Bills › 90th General Assembly

HF 2453Died when the session ended · February 29, 2024

Relating to the penalty for public employees and public officials taking money from a public employer

Sponsored by the House Judiciary Committee

Topics:Crime & correctionsState government

Same legislation: SF 2134, HSB 635, SF 2336

Write your legislators about it

Also covers SF 2134 and HSB 635 and SF 2336.

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 29, 2024
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 30, 2024
  3. Done: House committeeFebruary 8, 2024
  4. Done: Passes the HouseFebruary 29, 202495–0
  5. Done: Senate committeeMarch 14, 2024
  6. Stopped: Passes the SenateDied when the General Assembly ended
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The 2024 session adjourned on April 19, 2024, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary If a public employee or official steals more than $7,500, judges can no longer automatically delay or skip their sentence. A court may only suspend a sentence in these cases if the person proves there are special reasons to do so. This rule applies to anyone working for the state, local governments, or school districts.1

Read the official explanation

This bill prohibits a sentencing court from deferring the judgment or deferring the sentence of a defendant if the defendant was a public employee or public official at the time of the offense and the amount of money taken by the public employee or public official in connection with the offense exceeded $7,500. The bill prohibits a sentencing court from suspending the sentence of a defendant if the defendant was a public employee or public official at the time of the offense and the amount of money taken by the public employee or public official in connection with the offense exceeded $7,500 unless the defendant establishes, by clear and convincing evidence, and the sentencing court finds and states specifically on the record, that mitigating circumstances exist warranting a departure from the otherwise mandatory minimum term of incarceration. 2).

Full bill text2

House subcommittee

Named January 30, 2024 (as HSB 635). On February 6, 2024 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 3-0.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Fiscal note

Minimal Compare with other bills

AI summary This bill changes sentencing rules for public employees or officials who unlawfully take more than $7,500 from a public employer by limiting certain sentencing options. The bill is estimated to have a minimal fiscal impact to the state. The correctional impact and minority impact cannot be estimated due to a lack of data.3

Read the fiscal note

Description

House File 2453 prohibits a sentencing court from deferring the judgment or sentence of a defendant if the defendant was a public employee or public official who unlawfully took more than $7,500 from a public employer. The Bill also prohibits a sentencing court from suspending the sentence of a defendant if the defendant was a public employee or public official who unlawfully took more than $7,500 from a public employer unless mitigating circumstances exist.

Background

Iowa Code chapter 907 defines the following terms:

  • “Deferred judgment” means a sentencing option whereby both the adjudication of guilt and the imposition of a sentence are deferred by the court and whereby the court assesses a civil penalty as provided in Iowa Code section 907.14 upon the entry of the deferred judgment. The court retains the power to pronounce judgment and impose sentence subject to the defendant’s compliance with conditions set by the court as a requirement of the deferred judgment.
  • “Deferred sentence” means a sentencing option whereby the court enters an adjudication of guilt but does not impose a sentence. The court retains the power to sentence the defendant to any sentence it originally could have imposed subject to the defendant’s compliance with conditions set by the court as a requirement of the deferred sentence.
  • “Suspended sentence” means a sentencing option whereby the court pronounces judgment and imposes a sentence and then suspends execution of the sentence subject to the defendant’s compliance with conditions set by the court as a requirement of the suspended sentence. Revocation of the suspended sentence results in the execution of sentence already pronounced.

Assumptions

  • The following will not change over the projection period: charge, conviction, and sentencing patterns and trends; prisoner length of stay (LOS); revocation rates; plea bargaining; and other criminal justice system policies and practices.
  • A delay of six months is assumed from the effective date of this Bill to the date of first entry of affected offenders into the correctional system.
  • Marginal costs for county jails cannot be estimated due to a lack of data. For purposes of this analysis, the marginal cost for county jails is assumed to be $50 per day.
  • The marginal cost per day in prison is $24.94.

Correctional Impact

House File 2453 modifies sentencing guidelines related to the theft of public funds, and the correctional impact cannot be estimated due to a lack of data. Refer to the Legislative Services Agency (LSA) memo addressed to the General Assembly, Cost Estimates Used for Correctional Impact Statements, dated January 16, 2024, for information related to the correctional system.

Minority Impact

House File 2453 modifies sentencing guidelines related to the theft of public funds, and the minority impact cannot be estimated due to a lack of data. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Minority Impact Statement, dated January 16, 2024, for information related to minorities in the criminal justice system.

Fiscal Impact

House File 2453 is estimated to have a minimal fiscal impact to the State.

Sources

  • Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning, Department of Management
  • Department of Corrections
  • Judicial Branch

Reading a fiscal note4

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§907.3

How the Code works5

Lobbying

6 for · 0 against · 11 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in 2 earlier General Assemblies. None got through a chamber.

  • SSB 1105 SSB 1105
    89th General Assembly · In committee · very similar
    Cleared committee
  • HSB 601 HSB 601
    89th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage · very similar
    Cleared committee
  • HF 2436 Relating to the penalty for public employees and public officials taking money from a publ…
    88th General Assembly · Approved by committee · very similar
    Cleared committee

Similar bills this General Assembly

  • SSB 1017 SSB 1017
    90th General Assembly · In committee
    Very similar
  • HF 2574 Relating to the penalty for public employees and public officials taking money from a publ…
    91st General Assembly · Approved by committee
    Very similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.