Authorizing county boards of supervisors to determine whether the county permits forest and fruit-tree reservation tax exemptions

Where it is now

1. ✓
   Done: IntroducedJanuary 22, 2024
2. ✓
   Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 8, 2024
3. ✓
   Done: House committeeMarch 19, 2024
4. –
   Skipped: Passes the HouseContinued as HF 2672
5. Next: Senate committee
6. Next: Passes the Senate
7. Next: To the Governor
8. Next: Signed into law

Became HF 2672 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to HF 2672 What’s a funnel?

Amendments · 3

0 adopted · 1 failed · 2 never voted on. Newest first.

• S-5207 · filed April 19, 2024 by Sen. Mike Klimesh (R)

  AI summary This amendment swaps the word management for the word revenue. Its wording →
  Never voted on
• S-5194 · filed April 18, 2024 by

  AI summary This amendment replaces the bill with a new version that establishes an annual fee for land receiving forest and fruit-tree reservation tax exemptions. The fee is charged per acre and varies based on whether the owner lives in the same county, a neighboring county, or a different location. Its wording →
  Never voted on
• H-8254Strike everything · filed March 27, 2024 by

  AI summary This amendment replaces the entire bill with a new version that focuses on inspection rules and creating a task force. It allows inspectors to use aerial photographs instead of on-site visits and permits the collection of fees from owners to cover inspection costs. It also requires the Department of Natural Resources to form a task force to study the program and submit recommendations to the general assembly by November 1, 2024. Its wording →
  Failed
  36–57
  March 28, 2024