Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General
SSB 1210
Temas:Courts & civil law
La misma legislación: HSB 217
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado17 de febrero de 2021
- Hecho: Subcomité18 de febrero de 2021
- Se detuvo: Comité del SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2022 terminó el 24 de mayo de 2022, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA Employers would only be responsible for an employee's mistakes if they agree the employee was working at the time, preventing extra lawsuits against the company for how they hired or trained that person. Drivers involved in accidents would have a $750,000 limit on the money they must pay for things like pain and suffering. Additionally, people suing for extra punishment money must provide clear evidence of wrongdoing before they can ask for more information about a defendant's wealth. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to tort liability, including employer liability for an employee’s torts, noneconomic damages available against an operator of a motor vehicle, and pleading and discovery requirements related to punitive damages. The bill provides that an employer’s liability who is a defendant in a civil action for damages caused by negligence of an employee acting within the scope and course of employment shall be based on respondent superior. _____ an employee, or other claim of direct negligence on the part of the employer for the employee’s harmful conduct, or other similar claims, if the employer stipulates that at the time of the event that caused the damages that the person whose negligence is the basis of the action is the employer’s employee and the employee was acting within the course and scope of employment with the employer. If an employer makes the stipulation with respect to an employee, and the employee’s negligence is found to have caused or contributed to causing the damages, the employer shall be adjudged vicariously liable for the resulting damages. Under current law, an employer is liable for an employee’s negligence and may be held responsible for direct negligence relating to hiring, training, supervising, trusting an employee, or other claims of direct negligence on part of the employee’s harmful conduct, subject to certain limitations contained in Code chapter 671 (negligent hiring —— limitations on liability. The bill limits the amount of noneconomic damages available against the operator of a motor vehicle. The bill defines “noneconomic damages” to mean damages arising from pain, suffering, inconvenience, physical impairment, mental anguish, emotional pain and suffering, loss of chance, loss of consortium, or any other nonpecuniary damages and “occurrence” to mean the event, incident, or happening, and the acts or omissions incident thereto, which proximately caused injuries or damages for which recovery is claimed. The bill provides that the total amount recoverable in any civil action for noneconomic damages for personal injury or death against the operator of a motor vehicle shall be limited to $750,000 for any occurrence regardless of the number of plaintiffs, derivative claims, theories of liability, or defendants in the civil action.136A (medical malpractice).1 shall not be included in any initial claim for relief. A claim for punitive or exemplary damages may be allowed by amendment to the pleadings only after the exchange of initial disclosures and after the plaintiff establishes prima facie proof of a triable issue. After the plaintiff establishes the existence of a triable issue of punitive or exemplary damages, the court may allow additional discovery on the issue of punitive or exemplary damages. Under current law and under the bill, the mere allegation or assertion of a claim for punitive damages cannot form the basis for discovery of the wealth or ability to respond in damages on behalf of the party from whom punitive damages are claimed until the claimant has established that sufficient admissable evidence exists to support a prima facie case establishing, by a preponderance of clear, convincing, and satisfactory evidence, that the conduct of the defendant from which the claim arose constituted willful and wanton disregard for the rights or safety of another.
Senate subcommittee
Named February 18, 2021. Meeting: Thursday, February 25 · 3:00 PM · 217 Conference Room.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Modifica§668A.1
Cabildeo
13 a favor · 4 en contra · 12 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
89th General Assembly
Similar bills
- HSB 259 HSB 25989th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 772Nearly identical
Matched by wording or an identical title.