Bills › 89th General Assembly

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 2, 2021
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 2, 2021
  3. Done: Senate committeeFebruary 11, 2021
  4. Skipped: Passes the SenateContinued as SF 367
  5. Next: House committee
  6. Next: Passes the House
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Became SF 367 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 367 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary This bill changes how the state collects fines, fees, and other court debts from people involved in the justice system. It sets a $260 penalty for certain sex offender registrations and adds a $30 fee for any dishonored checks used to pay court debt. The Department of Revenue will also receive a portion of collected court debts to cover the cost of processing them.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to certain financial obligations, including under the consumer credit code, and including under the criminal and juvenile justice system by modifying criminal and civil surcharges, fines, fees, costs, and court debt. _____ or on behalf of the state or a state agency for purposes of the consumer credit code under Code chapter 537.110 (registration fees and civil penalty for sex offenders) on or after June 25, 2020, a civil penalty of $260.110(2). The bill provides that the clerk of the district court shall collect a dishonored check fee of $30 submitted for the payment of any court debt. 1, fees, forfeited bail, and other debt paid to or collected by the clerk of the district court. “Restitution” means pecuniary damages, category “A” restitution, and category “B” restitution. The bill provides that the department of revenue shall receive percent of all court debt payments collected on cases assigned to the department of revenue for collection to reflect the cost of processing, with the remainder of the court debt to be collected by the clerk of the district court for distribution in accordance with applicable law. The department of revenue shall not receive payment from any court debt collected that is payable to a crime victim as pecuniary damages until after the clerk of the district court has received the entirety of the court debt payable to the crime victim as pecuniary damages.8107(3)(a)(2), Code 2021, and the department’s fee shall be applied to such a payment. The department of revenue fee added to the court debt shall be deducted from the amount of court debt owed to the clerk of the district court. _____ amount of court debt owed to zero, the department of revenue shall issue a refund to the person in the amount attributable to the processing fee added to the court debt.8107(3)(b)(2) is repealed on January 1, 2023. Current law allows the county attorney or the county attorney’s designee to collect a percentage of court debt collected after the court debt is deemed delinquent, but not for amounts collected for restitution involving pecuniary damages, the victim compensation fund, the crime services surcharge, the sex offender civil penalty, the agricultural theft surcharge, or amounts collected as a result of written off or setoff debt. The bill amends debts for which the county attorney is not entitled to include amounts collected for the human trafficking victim surcharge, domestic abuse assault, domestic abuse protective order contempt, sexual abuse, stalking, and a human trafficking surcharge.425 or the person owing the court debt cannot be found after diligent inquiry and the director of the department of revenue determines the department will not be able to locate the person owing the court debt.7. _____ pursuant to the bill.504 (setoff procedures).7 and obtained a ruling from the district court prior to the issue being raised in the appellate court.2B to domestic and sexual abuse crimes surcharge. The bill provisionally rescinds the Iowa administrative code rule concerning a fee for the collection of court debt.8107(3). The bill provides that the department of revenue shall receive percent of all court debt payments collected on cases assigned to the department of revenue for collection to reflect the cost of processing, which makes the rule unnecessary.8107(3) (relating to the collection of court debt by the department of revenue) take effect upon enactment.8107(3) applies retroactively to January 1, 2021.

Changed since by amendments H-1412, S-3035; see Amendments.

Full bill text · What changed before it passed2

Senate subcommittee

Named February 2, 2021. On February 11, 2021 it recommended amendment and passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Fiscal note

AI summary Senate File 367 makes technical corrections to the collection of fines and fees and requires the Iowa Department of Revenue to receive a 15.0% processing fee on certain court debt collections. The bill is estimated to have a fiscal impact of approximately $1.2 million annually beginning in fiscal year 2022. This amount represents a combined revenue reduction for the state's General Fund, cities, and counties, though the exact division of this impact is unknown.3

Read the fiscal note

Description

Senate File 367 relates to certain financial obligations under the consumer credit code and the criminal and juvenile justice system by modifying criminal and civil surcharges, fines, fees, costs, and court debt. The Bill makes several technical corrections related to the collection of fines and civil fees. Senate File 367 expands the debts of which the county attorney may not collect a percentage to include all current surcharges.

Senate File 367 amends the definition of court debt to mean all restitution as defined in Iowa Code section 910.1, fees, forfeited bail, and other debt paid to or collected by the clerk of the district court. The Bill requires the Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR) receive 15.0% of each court debt payment as a processing fee on cases assigned to the IDR for collection, with the remainder of the court debt to be collected by the clerk of the district court for distribution in accordance with applicable law. The IDR collection fee must not include the amount of court debt collected for restitution involving pecuniary damages, the Victim Compensation Fund, the crime services surcharge, the domestic and sexual abuse crimes surcharge, the agricultural surcharge, or the sex offender civil penalty.

Senate File 367 provides that payments made by a person between January 1, 2021, and January 1, 2022, which added the IDR processing fee to the debt owed, shall be calculated as if the payment had been made and the IDR fee shall be applied to such a payment. The IDR processing fee added to the debt shall be deducted from the amount of court debt owed. If a payment made by a person owing court debt during this specified time reduces the total amount owed to zero, the clerk of court shall issue a refund to the person in the amount of the processing fee. This provision is repealed on January 1, 2023.

Senate File 367 rescinds Iowa administrative rule 701—155.1(602) on January 1, 2022. Section 2 of the Bill, which makes a conforming change to Iowa Code section 602.8105, is effective upon enactment and also applies retroactively to July 15, 2020. Section 4 of the Bill, which relates to the collection of court debt by the IDR and the 15.0% processing fee collected by the Department, is effective on January 1, 2022.

Background

Prior to July 1, 2015, delinquent court debt was assigned to the Centralized Collection Unit (CCU) of the IDR at the time of delinquency. The CCU charged a 10.0% processing fee in addition to the delinquent debt. The CCU was removed from the collections process beginning in FY 2016, and debt was assigned to the private collector Linebarger, Goggan, Blair, and Sampson, L.L.P. (Linebarger), at the time of delinquency. In FY 2017, further changes to the court debt collection system were implemented. The collections timeline was modified to allow the county attorneys to begin collecting after 30 days from assessment or the due date of an installment payment. If a county attorney has filed a notice of full commitment to collect delinquent court debt and a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the clerk of the district Court, the debt is assigned to the county attorney. If not, the debt is assigned to the designated private debt collector.

During the 2020 Legislative Session, SF 457 (Criminal Fines and Surcharges) was enacted, which removed the private debt collector from the court debt collection process and replaced it with the CCU of the IDR beginning in January 2021. Currently, the IDR is permitted to collect a processing fee in addition to the delinquent debt in order to cover administrative costs. The fee is set by administrative rule at 15.0%. If enacted, this Bill will repeal the IDR administrative rule.

Assumptions

  • The IDR collections will be similar to the average Linebarger collections from the last three fiscal years. The average annual collection by Linebarger was approximately $9.7 million. In FY 2021, the IDR will collect half of the average annual Linebarger collection since IDR began collecting court debt halfway through the fiscal year.
  • Based on the FY 2020 court debt collections, 82.0% of all fines and fees collected by and owed to the State will have a processing fee applied and collected from those fees. Court debt is comprised of: 22.0% attorney fees, 17.0% court costs, 33.0% fines, 10.0% jury and witness fees, and 18.0% surcharges.
  • The 15.0% processing fee will cover all administrative costs incurred by the IDR while collecting court debt.

Fiscal Impact

Senate File 367 is estimated to have a fiscal impact of approximately $1.2 million annually beginning in FY 2022. It is estimated that the IDR will collect approximately $1.2 million in processing fees and as a result, the State General Fund and city and county budgets will experience a combined revenue reduction of the same amount. This processing fee will cover any IDR administrative costs. It is unknown at this time how the $1.2 million negative impact would be divided between the State, cities, and counties. Table 1 provides the annual State collection categories and the fees estimated to be collected from each category beginning in FY 2022.

Table 1 — IDR Estimated State Collections and Fees Beginning in FY 2022 The IDR began collecting court debt on January 1, 2021, and currently collects the processing fee in addition to the amount owed. If between the time the IDR began collecting and January 1, 2022, a person pays off their court debt, including the processing fee, the clerk of court is required to refund the additional processing fee. It is estimated that the IDR will collect $600,000 in processing fees in FY 2021, but it is unknown how much of this will be collected and qualify for refund on January 1, 2022. This may have a fiscal impact on the State General Fund and city and county budgets, but the impact is unknown at this time.Annual Estimated Collections* Est. Fees (15.0%) Attorney Fees 2,132,000$ 319,800$ Court Costs 1,647,000 247,050 Jury and Witness 969,000 145,350 Fines 3,198,000 479,700 Surcharges 1,744,000 N/A Total 9,690,000$ 1,191,900$ *Does not include victim restitution or other amounts not owed to the State.

Sources

  • Judicial Branch
  • Iowa Department of Revenue
  • LSA analysis

Reading a fiscal note4

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§537.1301§602.8105§602.8106§602.8107§692A.110§910.3§911.2B

How the Code works5

Lobbying

0 for · 1 against · 13 undecided · Who →

Family tree

89th General Assembly