Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General
SSB 1018
Temas:State government
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado12 de enero de 2021
- Hecho: Subcomité14 de enero de 2021
- Hecho: Comité del Senado27 de enero de 2021
- Se saltó: Lo aprueba el SenadoSigue como SF 183
- Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Ahora es SF 183 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a SF 183 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
La explicación oficial está en inglés; todavía no hay resumen en palabras sencillas.
This bill concerns public construction and improvement contracts. DIVISION I —— PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION BIDDING REQUIREMENTS.4, relating to architectural and engineering services, is amended to prohibit fee-based selection of an architect, landscape architect, or engineer for a public improvement.34 is amended to prohibit the state board of regents from entering into a design-build contract to construct, repair, or improve buildings or grounds. This provision takes effect upon enactment. However, the provision does not apply if an architect entered into a design-build contract with the state board of regents prior to the effective date of the provision.
Lea la explicación completa
DIVISION II —— GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE CONTRACTS. _____ maximum price contract for purposes of public improvement contracts.1 defines, among other terms, “construction manager-at-risk”, “governmental entity”, “guaranteed maximum price contract” and “public improvement”. “Guaranteed maximum price contract” is defined to mean the agreed to fixed or guaranteed maximum price pursuant to a contract entered into by the construction manager-at-risk and the governmental entity. “Construction manager-at-risk” means a legal entity that assumes the risk for the construction, rehabilitation, alteration, or repair of a project and provides consultant services to the governmental entity in the development and design phases, working collaboratively with the design professionals involved. “Governmental entity” is defined to mean the state, political subdivisions of the state, and public school corporations, and is specifically defined to include the state board of regents. “Public improvement” is defined to mean the same as for purposes of Code chapter governing public construction bidding.2 authorizes a governmental entity to enter into a guaranteed maximum price contract for a public improvement, notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary.3 establishes the process for entering into a guaranteed maximum price contract. The new Code section provides procedures governing public disclosure of an intent to enter into a guaranteed maximum price contract, selection of an engineer, landscape architect, or architect, a request for qualifications process, a request for proposals and selection process, and selection of trade contractors and material packages. _____ construction.
Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse1
Senate subcommittee
Named January 14, 2021. On January 20, 2021 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Nota fiscal
Resumen con IA This bill changes how certain public improvement projects are contracted by prohibiting the Board of Regents from using design-build contracts and allowing governmental entities to use guaranteed maximum price contracts. The fiscal impact of prohibiting design-build contracts on Board of Regents building projects is unknown. The fiscal impact of allowing all public entities to enter into guaranteed maximum price contracts cannot be determined at this time. (en inglés)2
Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)
Description
Senate File 183 consists of two divisions that make the following changes:
Division I
- Prohibits the Iowa Board of Regents from entering into a design-build contract to construct, repair, or improve buildings or grounds. This prohibition does not apply to projects that are currently under contract. Provisions of Division I that amend Iowa Code section 262.34 are effective immediately.
- Prohibits governmental entities from utilizing the fee-based selection of an architect, landscape architect, or engineer for a public improvement.
Division II
- Adopts new definitions for “construction manager-at-risk,” “governmental entity,” “guaranteed maximum price contract,” and other terms.
- Authorizes a governmental entity to enter into a guaranteed maximum price contract for the construction of a public improvement.
- Adopts procedures and requirements for public entities that are pursuing a guaranteed maximum price contract. These procedures include public disclosures, a request for qualifications, a request for proposal, and the selection of bid winners.
- Prohibits all governmental entities from entering into a design-build contract for the construction of a public improvement.
- Prohibits governmental entities from entering into a guaranteed maximum price contract for public improvements relating to highway, bridge, or culvert construction.
Background
With the exception of the Board of Regents, all current public improvement projects are completed using a process that requires governmental entities to bid projects using a design-bid-build contract.
The Board of Regents currently uses both design-bid-build and design-build contracts. The Board has completed or initiated a total of 14 contracts using design-build to develop projects. As of February 2021, the Board had completed seven projects using design-build. These projects are listed in Table 1.
Table 1 — Board of Regents Projects Completed Under Design-Build The Board is also planning or currently working on seven projects that will use design-build. These projects are reflected in Table 2.
Table 2 — Ongoing Board of Regents Projects Under Design-Build
Assumptions
- Allowing public entities to enter into guaranteed maximum price contracts may allow additional flexibility when designing public improvement projects. The extent to which governmental entities may use these agreements and the impact of them is unknown.
- Prohibiting the use of design-build may impact expenses for future Board projects by an unknown amount. The extent to which the Board of Regents may use guaranteed maximum price contracts and the impact of them is unknown.
Fiscal Impact
Prohibiting the use of design-build will have an unknown impact on Board of Regents building projects. The fiscal impact of allowing all public entities to enter into guaranteed maximum price contracts cannot be determined at this time.Institution Project Completion Budget Iowa Hawkeye Tennis and Recreation Complex Dec. 2014 15,000,000$ Iowa Biomedical Research Support Facility Dec. 2015 33,868,000 Iowa Elizabeth Catlett Residence Hall Jun. 2017 95,000,000 Iowa Chilled Water Plant 2 (West) Jul. 2018 5,200,000 Iowa Hancher Footbridge Aug. 2018 3,200,000 Iowa State Gregory L. Geoffroy Hall Dec. 2016 49,500,000 Iowa State Poultry Farm Spring 2020 5,750,000 Iowa State Gerdin Business Building Fall 2020 28,000,000 Northern Iowa McElroy Hall Aug. 2001 2,000,000Institution Project
Scheduled
Completion Phase Budget
Iowa Oakdale Studio Dec. 2021 Construction 2,500,000$ Iowa Women's Soccer Fall 2021 Construction 3,900,000$ Iowa State Curtiss Farm-Feed Mill and Grain Science Summer 2021 Select DB 21,200,000 Iowa State Veterinary Diagnostic Lab Summer 2023 RPF for DB 75,000,000 Iowa State Industrial and Manufacturings Sys. Engin. tbd. Programming 40,000,000 Iowa State LeBaron Hall Summer 2024 Programming 55,000,000 Iowa State Utilities Power Plant Jun. 2023 Programming 14,000,000 Iowa State Veterinary Diagnostic Lab - Addition tbd. Programming 62,400,000
Sources
- Iowa Board of Regents
- Legislative Services Agency
- Final Fiscal Note — Guaranteed Maximum Price Contracts, Public Improvements · 27 de junio de 2022
- Guaranteed Maximum Price Contracts, Public Improvements · 8 de febrero de 2021
- Guaranteed Maximum Price Contracts, Public Improvements · 27 de enero de 2021
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Cabildeo
8 a favor · 13 en contra · 24 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Tried before
89th General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None became law, though one got through a chamber.
- SF 2364 Relating to a construction manager-at-risk commercial construction alternative delivery me…88th General Assembly · Passed Senate · very similarPassed a chamber
Matched by wording or an identical title.