Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General

SF 580Murió al terminar la sesión · 17 de marzo de 2021

Prohibiting the state or a political subdivision of the state from entering into contracts with, or providing tax incentives or specified benefits to, certain companies that censor online content, and including effective date and applicability provisions

Presentado por el comité Ways and Means (successor To Sf 402) del Senado

Temas:Civil rightsTaxesTechnology & privacyTax credits & incentives

La misma legislación: SF 402, HSB 235, SF 571

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado18 de febrero de 2021
  2. Hecho: Subcomité22 de febrero de 2021
  3. Hecho: Comité del Senado8 de marzo de 2021
  4. Hecho: Lo aprueba el Senado17 de marzo de 202130–17
  5. Se detuvo: Comité de la CámaraMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2022 terminó el 24 de mayo de 2022, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA Large online companies are prohibited from censoring certain content or restricting how Iowa citizens interact with it. If a court finds that a company has violated these rules, the state cannot enter into contracts with them or provide them with tax incentives. Users of these websites also gain the right to opt out of certain algorithms used to promote posts or hide content. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill prohibits the state or political subdivisions of the state from entering into contracts with, or providing tax incentives or other specified benefits to, certain companies that censor online content. The bill requires that, before public funds are used for economic development, the public body dispensing the public funds shall consider whether a court has found that the person to whom the funds will be dispersed has violated a provision of new Code chapter 554E, and whether the person is involved in litigation in which it has been alleged that the person violated Code chapter 554E. 17 to provide that, for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2021, if a political subdivision has been found to have violated new Code chapter 554E during the 12-month period prior to the date taxes are certified, the amount of the political subdivision’s budget certified under Code chapter and the amount of taxes certified back to the county auditor by the department of management shall be reduced as described in the bill. Current law requires a county board of supervisors and a city council to post a public hearing notice on the board’s or council’s social media account. The bill provides that posting of the public hearing notice is authorized but not required. The bill establishes new Code chapter 554E. The bill adds several defined terms to the Code chapter, including definitions for “company”, “content generated by bots”, “excessively violent content”, “expressive merchandise”, “governmental entity”, “intellectual property”, “internet site”, “massive online marketplace”, “massive online video sharing website”, “massive social networking website”, “monopolistic entity”, “obscene material”, “pornography”, “pre-installed application store”, and “social networking website”. The bill prohibits a company from intentionally affecting the ability of a citizen of this state to view, comment, or otherwise interact with certain content on the company’s internet site by restricting such content. The bill prohibits a company from intentionally affecting the ability of a citizen of this state to interact with certain content on the company’s internet site, restricting the ability of a citizen of this state to download a social networking website on a pre-installed application store, or restricting the ability of a citizen of this state to purchase any protected publication or expressive merchandise on a massive online marketplace as prescribed in the bill. The bill provides, however, that a company may restrict the ability of a citizen of this state to interact with a United States citizen’s content on the company’s internet site in certain enumerated cases. The bill requires a company to provide its subscribers, members, and users who are citizens of this state with the ability to opt out of post promoting algorithms and shadow banning algorithms on the company’s massive online marketplace, massive online video sharing website, or massive social networking website. The bill defines “post promoting algorithm” and “shadow banning algorithm”. The bill provides that a court’s finding that a company has violated the prohibition on censorship shall be conclusive proof of the company’s breach of any agreement between the company and a governmental entity, and the governmental entity shall cancel the agreement effective as of the date described in the bill. The bill provides that, upon a court’s finding that a company has violated this prohibition on censorship, the company shall be prohibited from entering into any future agreement with a governmental entity and shall be prohibited from receiving any future payment from a governmental entity.7. Additionally, the bill establishes that this 20-year prohibition shall be reinstated for each subsequent finding by a court that a company violated the prohibition on censorship.335B; sales tax exemptions or refunds; or property tax rebates, refunds, reimbursements, or grants for property taxes paid, that were previously claimed by the company shall be recaptured as provided in the bill. The bill provides that the prohibition on entering into any agreement with a governmental entity and the requirement that unearned amounts be returned to governmental entities shall not be stayed during appeal proceedings. The bill requires a governmental entity to take certain enumerated steps with respect to companies it may have agreements with within days of the effective date of the bill.3. The bill requires the office of the attorney general to develop a form describing these enforcement rights within seven days of the effective date of the bill. The bill provides that if a governmental entity intentionally violates Code chapter 554E, certain financial penalties will apply. The bill requires the attorney general to enforce the provisions of Code chapter 554E. The bill requires the attorney general to appeal a district court’s decision if a company prevails in the district court in an action under Code chapter 554E. Additionally, the bill requires the attorney general to file an application for further review with the supreme court if, after the first appeal, the supreme court transfers the case to the court of appeals and the company prevails in the action before the court of appeals. The bill provides that, within days of the effective date of the bill, the attorney general shall make available on its internet site a system to allow a citizen of this state to report potential violations of Code chapter 554E by a company or by a governmental entity. The bill requires this system to include several features. The bill establishes certain investigative responsibilities of the attorney general with respect to reports submitted through this system. The bill requires the attorney general to file suit in a court of competent jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of the Code chapter, and the bill establishes when the attorney general shall file suit. The bill provides the attorney general with certain enumerated powers. Additionally, the bill requires the attorney general to notify the department of management regarding the outcome of cases arising under the Code chapter.6 shall be kept confidential and are not subject to Code chapter 22. The bill authorizes companies that have been found to have violated a provision of Code chapter 554E to petition the court for a stay of the provisions of the Code chapter. The bill prescribes when this petition may be filed, how many petitions may be filed, bonding requirements, statements that the attorney general must file, when a court may grant the stay, and what occurs in the event a company violates the provisions of this Code chapter again after a stay has been granted. The bill establishes that governmental entities impacted by an action under Code chapter 554E may intervene in an action under the Code chapter. Additionally, the bill establishes that a citizen of this state who has reported a company’s violation of the bill to the attorney general may intervene in any action related to that company under the Code chapter.3, subsection 2, and if the company’s potential violation of the Code chapter occurred at least days following the effective date of the bill.3.2, subsection 3, which would relieve a political subdivision from complying with a state mandate if funding for the cost of the state mandate is not provided or specified. Therefore, political subdivisions are required to comply with any state mandate included in the bill. The bill authorizes the attorney general to adopt rules to administer and interpret Code chapter 554E. The bill requires the attorney general to create a transitional reporting system within days following the effective date of the bill that will operate until days following the effective date of the bill. The bill requires the transitional reporting system to include, at a minimum, a mechanism for the electronic submission of reports of potential violations of chapter 554E and the electronic evidence associated with the potential violations. The bill takes effect upon enactment and applies to agreements between a company and a governmental entity in effect or entered into on or after the effective date of the bill.

Cambiado después por la enmienda S-3078; vea Enmiendas.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)2

Nota fiscal

Resumen con IA This bill prohibits the state and local governments from providing economic incentives or contracts to certain technology companies found by a court to have violated censorship laws. If a company is found in violation, the state and local governments can reclaim previously awarded tax credits, exemptions, and other benefits. The fiscal impact of these changes cannot be fully estimated, though the note illustrates potential revenue increases for the state's General Fund and local jurisdictions if a single affected taxpayer were to lose their incentives. (en inglés)3

Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)

Description

Senate File 580 prohibits the State or political subdivisions from entering into contracts with, or providing tax incentives or any other economic benefits to, certain technology companies that affect the ability of Iowans to view, comment, or otherwise interact with certain content on a company’s Internet site, as decided by a court. The Bill requires that, before public funds are used for economic development, the public body must consider whether a court has found that the person to whom the funds will be dispersed has violated a provision of the newly established Iowa Code chapter 554E, and whether the person is involved in litigation in which it has been alleged that the person violated Iowa Code chapter 554E.

If a political subdivision enters into a contract or provides incentives to a company found in violation of the Bill, the amount of taxes from the previous fiscal year certified back to the county auditor from the Department of Management will be reduced by 10.0%, and another 5.0% in a subsequent year.

Any governmental entity will be prohibited from entering into a contract or providing economic incentives to a company found in violation of the Bill for a period of 20 years from the date of a court’s finding. Tax incentives and economic benefits affected by the Bill include tax credits, assistance under Iowa Code section 15.335B, sales tax exemptions or refunds, property tax rebates or grants, and any other benefits previously claimed by a company going back to January 1, 2001. Any previously awarded benefits will be reclaimed by the State or local government jurisdiction.

The Bill requires the Attorney General to provide enforcement guidance to political subdivisions in any contractual obligations going forward, and requires the Attorney General to enforce provisions in the Bill, including appealing a district court’s decision if a company prevails in district court in an action under Iowa Code chapter 554E and filing an application for further review with the Supreme Court if a company prevails in the Court of Appeals. The Attorney General must also, within 60 days of the effective date of the Bill, provide an Internet site available to the public so individuals can report any instances of potential censorship, which the Attorney General must investigate within 30 days of receipt. The Attorney General must adopt rules to administer the Bill. The Bill also authorizes governmental entities and individuals to intervene in a legal action that involves them.

The Bill includes a State mandate and makes inapplicable Iowa Code section 25B.2(3), which would relieve a political subdivision from complying with a State mandate if funding for the cost of the State mandate is not provided.

The Bill takes effect upon enactment.

Background

The Iowa Economic Development Authority (IEDA) administers State tax credits, with a statutory cap of $155.0 million in FY 2021. The IEDA has the authority through Iowa Code section 15.333 to award Investment Tax Credits. Businesses may claim a tax credit on corporate, income, and insurance premium taxes equal to a percentage of the new investments directly related to new jobs created or retained by a project. Eligible investments include the cost of machinery and equipment purchased for use in the operation of the business, the purchase price of real property and any buildings and structures located on the property, the cost of improvements made to the property, and base rent paid by a business to a third-party developer. Since 2007, the IEDA has awarded $45.7 million in Investment Tax Credits to four technology firms for four projects totaling $2.8 billion in investments that involve 203 new and retained jobs. Most of these credits are from IEDA’s High Quality Jobs Program (HQJP), which provides tax benefits to eligible companies that create high-paying jobs and make capital investments. The HQJP has a statutory cap of $105.0 million per year to use in tax credits. In FY 2020, IEDA awarded $26.0 million in HQJP tax credits to 24 projects. Tax credits can be claimed for five years in most cases.

The IEDA is also authorized to provide sales and use tax exemptions to eligible businesses, including contractors and subcontractors on a project after construction is completed, as part of the HQJP. In FY 2019, $28.3 million was claimed in State sales and use taxes, $24.6 million due to the HQJP. Since 2007, the IEDA has awarded $84.1 million in sales and use tax exemptions to three technology corporations for eight projects totaling $4.9 billion in investments that involve 391 new and retained jobs. Sales and use tax exemptions to eligible businesses can also affect the Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) in jurisdictions with local sales and use taxes.

Local governments also have the authority to award eligible businesses property tax credits and economic incentives in conjunction with IEDA’s tax credit programs, including the HQJP. Since 2007, four technology companies have received full or partial property tax exemptions in conjunction with IEDA’s tax credit programs for six projects totaling $2.7 billion. Tax-increment financing (TIF) and infrastructure improvements have also been awarded by local governments to technology corporations for five projects. Iowa Code section 427.1 allows property tax exemptions for web search portal businesses and data center businesses. In 2020, there was $766.92 million in assessed value derived from these exemptions.

Assessed property evaluations within a school district affect the amount of State General Fund dollars sent to each school district. The State, by operation of the State School Foundation Aid Formula, funds school districts up to 87.0% of total funding after a uniform levy of $5.40 is assessed on all property within a district. Beyond 87.0%, an additional levy is assessed on all property within a district to reach 100.0% of per pupil funding for a school district. Per Iowa Code section 24.17, local governments and school districts must certify their budgets not later than March 31 and April 15, respectively, each fiscal year, with a copy sent to the county auditor and the State Appeal Board within the Department of Management. By June 15 of each fiscal year, the Department of Management certifies taxes available to the county auditor for the local government or school district.

Assumptions

  • There are no potential legal decisions over the next two years that would cause the State to recoup any previously awarded benefits until FY 2024 at the earliest.
  • The Legislative Services Agency (LSA) cannot assume the result of theoretical legal proceedings. For purposes of this fiscal note, however, the LSA will illustrate the fiscal impact if one taxpayer that has signed contracts with the State of Iowa and local government jurisdictions, and has been operational in the State since 2019, is found in court to have violated provisions of the Bill prohibiting online censorship.
  • The Bill would lead to the revocation of tax credits provided under Iowa Code section 15.335B and the 100.0% recapture of any such tax credits that have already been claimed by a taxpayer, including tax credits awarded through the HQJP, including both Investment Tax Credits and Sales and Use Tax Refunds, beginning in FY 2024.
  • The Bill provides for the 100.0% recapture of tax credits, tax exemptions, and other tax benefits claimed in prior years. The estimated impacts associated with the recapture of these prior-year claims are provided separately in this estimate. For purposes of this estimate, these are assumed to occur in FY 2024 and, in the case of property taxes, FY 2025.
  • Prospective Investment Tax Credit and sales tax impacts would occur beginning FY 2024, and prospective property tax impacts would begin with assessment year (AY) 2024 and would affect property tax revenues beginning with FY 2026.
  • The estimated timing of fiscal impacts resulting from the revocation of unclaimed tax credits that have already been allocated or awarded reflects the projected timing of awarded claims under current law, according to Iowa Department of Revenue (IDR).
  • Estimates of the currently exempt sales made nonexempt by the proposal are based on an Iowa IDR analysis of sales reported as exempt by taxpayers assumed to be affected by the proposal. It is assumed that the share of currently exempt sales tax authorized by Iowa Code section 423.3(92), (93), and (95) and made nonexempt by the proposal is proportionate among all affected taxpayers.
  • Estimates of property tax impacts are based on the value of commercial property receiving web/data exemptions under Iowa Code section 427.1(35), (36), and (37) is from the IDR abstracts of assessment. The value of commercial property receiving web/data exemptions was $766.92 million in AY 2020. This fiscal note assumes that 20.0% of the value will be affected by the Bill.
  • Estimated property tax impacts assume a levy rate of $37.21430 per $1,000 of taxable valuation and a commercial rollback rate of 90.0%.
  • Property tax recapture would create the need for credits to the General Fund for past years’ per pupil payment, or a reduction in future year School Aid Formula payments.
  • Growth in estimated impacts arising from the elimination of sales tax exemptions and property tax exemptions and rebates reflects 2.0% annual inflation.
  • Changes to corporate income tax and sales and use tax liability as a result of the proposal are estimated to lead to General Fund revenue increases. Changes to sales and use tax liability also affect LOST assessed at 1.0%. Changes to property tax liability are assumed to decrease expenditures from the General Fund by operation of the State School Foundation Aid Formula; otherwise such changes will lead to revenue increases for affected local jurisdictions.
  • Local government jurisdictions do not violate the section of the Bill that would result in any removal of appropriations or tax revenues.
  • The Attorney General would need to establish a new division to handle and investigate complaints, then litigate against multiple large technology companies at the same time.
  • The Attorney General would hire additional positions to meet the requirements of the Bill beginning in FY 2022.
  • The Attorney General may need to hire 3.0 full-time equivalent (FTE) investigators. If an experienced investigator is hired, the cost would be up to approximately $117,000 per FTE position. However, the entry-level cost of an Investigator 4 position would be approximately $72,000. For estimation purposes, a midpoint is used for the estimated cost.
  • The Attorney General may need to hire 3.0 FTE attorneys. If an experienced attorney is hired, the cost would be up to approximately $156,036 per FTE position. However, the cost of an entry-level Assistant Attorney General 3 position is $115,417. For estimation purposes, a midpoint is used for the estimated cost.

Fiscal Impact

Tax Impact to State and Local Governments If one taxpayer is adversely affected through a legal decision, the Bill is estimated to increase General Fund revenue by $21.0 million beginning in FY 2024 before dropping to a $4.7 million increase in FY 2025, and remaining relatively stable through FY 2030. The Bill increases revenue to local jurisdictions by $12.4 million beginning in FY 2024 before dropping to a $4.7 million positive impact in FY 2025 and increasing slightly through FY 2030. Table 1 below outlines the estimated fiscal impact to the General Fund and local government jurisdictions from the Bill.

Office of the Attorney General

The Attorney General estimates it would need to hire three investigators and three attorneys to fulfill the requirements of this Bill. The annual cost increase to the Attorney General would be approximately $690,000 beginning in FY 2022 (Table 2).

Table 2 — Attorney General FTE Costs There may be additional and ongoing costs for the setup and maintenance of the complaint process, but an estimate cannot be made at this time.Fiscal

Year

Revocation

of Tax

Credits

Allocated

or Awarded

Recapture

of Tax

Credits

Previously

Claimed

Change in

State

School

Foundation

Aid

Recapture of

State School

Foundation Aid

Associated with

Property Tax

Incentives for

Prior Years

Elimination

of Sales and Use

Tax

Exemptions

Recapture of

Past Sales

and Use Tax

Exemptions

Total

General

Fund

Impact

Property

Tax

Recapture

of Property

Tax

Incentives

for Prior

Years

Local

Options

Sales Tax

(LOST)

Recapture

of Past

Local

Option

Sales Tax

(LOST)

Total Impact

on Local

Jurisdictions

FY 2022 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FY 2023 - - - - - - - - - - - - FY 2024 1.7 10.0 - 2.2 1.4 5.7 21.0 - 11.2 0.2 0.9 12.4 FY 2025 2.4 - - 0.9 1.5 - 4.7 - 4.5 0.2 - 4.7 FY 2026 2.0 - 0.9 - 1.5 - 4.4 4.6 - 0.2 - 4.8 FY 2027 3.4 - 0.9 - 1.5 - 5.8 4.7 - 0.3 - 4.9 FY 2028 1.9 - 0.9 - 1.5 - 4.3 4.8 - 0.3 - 5.0 FY 2029 1.2 - 0.9 - 1.6 - 3.7 4.9 - 0.3 - 5.1 FY 2030 1.7 - 1.0 - 1.6 - 4.3 5.0 - 0.3 - 5.2 Estimated General Fund Fiscal Increases ($ Millions) Estimated Local Jurisdiction Fiscal Increases ($ Millions) Table 1: Estimated Tax Impact of Senate File 580Salary and

Benefits

Est. FTE

Positions

Required Total Cost

Investigator 4 94,000$ 3.0 282,000$ Asst. Atty General 3 136,000 3.0 408,000 690,000$

Sources

  • Iowa Economic Development Authority
  • Iowa Department of Revenue
  • Iowa Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General
  • LSA analysis

Cómo leer una nota fiscal4

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§554E.1§554E.2§554E.3§554E.4§554E.5§554E.6§554E.7§554E.8§554E.9

Modifica§15A.1§24.17§331.433A§384.15A

Cómo funciona el Código5

Cabildeo

0 a favor · 22 en contra · 19 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Similar bills

  • HF 451 Prohibiting the state or a political subdivision of the state from entering into contracts…
    91st General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage
    Very similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.