Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General

SF 558Murió al terminar la sesión · 4 de marzo de 2021

Relating to interpreters and translators for limited-English-proficient, deaf, and hard-of-hearing persons in certain legal proceedings, making appropriations, and including effective date provisions

Presentado por el comité Judiciary (companion To Hf 707 By Committee on Appropriations) del Senado

Temas:State budgetCourts & civil law

La misma legislación: HSB 70, SSB 1108, HF 445, HF 707

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado27 de enero de 2021
  2. Hecho: Subcomité28 de enero de 2021
  3. Hecho: Comité del Senado1 de marzo de 2021
  4. Hecho: Lo aprueba el Senado13 de abril de 202145–0
  5. Se saltó: Comité de la CámaraSe saltó
  6. Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara9 de marzo de 2021
  7. Hecho: A gobernador(a)30 de abril de 2021
  8. Hecho: Firmado como ley30 de abril de 2021

HF 707 se hizo ley → La misma legislación se aprobó como HF 707, así que esta versión se dejó de lado. Ir a HF 707 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA This law changes how the state pays for interpreters and translators who help people communicate in court or during administrative hearings. It clarifies the definitions for these roles and allows officials to check if an interpreter is neutral and unbiased. The state court administrator will now handle the review and payment of these service fees instead of the indigent defense fund. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to interpreters for limited-English-proficient persons and sign language interpreters for deaf and hard-of-hearing persons. The bill amends Code chapter 622A, which in the bill provides for interpreters for limited-English-proficient persons in legal proceedings. The bill defines “interpreter” to mean a person who transfers the meaning of spoken or written words in one language into the equivalent meaning in another spoken language. The bill defines “limited English proficient” to mean the inability to adequately understand or effectively communicate in the English language because a person’s primary language is a language other than English. The bill also defines “translator” to mean a person who transfers the meaning of written or spoken words in one language into the equivalent meaning in the written words of another language.1302(3) when a limited-English-proficient person is entitled to an interpreter or translator and the interpreter services are not provided before an administrative agency. The bill provides that in civil cases, every court shall tax the costs of an interpreter or translator the same as other court costs.15 for the purpose of receiving fees, except that subpoenas are not required. The bill provides that an administrative agency shall pay an interpreter when a limited-English-proficient person is entitled to an interpreter and the interpreter services are provided before an administrative agency. The bill provides that the agency may require that the party to the proceeding pay the expense of the interpreter. The bill provides that an interpreter or translator in a legal proceeding shall take an oath consistent with rules the supreme court adopts under Code chapter 622A. The bill provides that in addition to a court or administrative agency being able to inquire into the qualifications and integrity of an interpreter, the court or administrative agency may also inquire into the neutrality of the interpreter, and may do the same with regard to translators. The bill amends the section of Code chapter 622A that provides the authorization for rulemaking to specify interpreters appearing in legal proceedings and adds translators to the provision. The bill provides that an electronic recording of the portion of proceedings where non-English testimony is given shall be made and maintained for one year after the entry of the final disposition or sentence, or if the final judgment is appealed, until one year after the final disposition of the appeal. The bill provides that communications between a limited-English-proficient person and a third party which are privileged under Code chapter 622 in which an interpreter or translator participates as an interpreter or translator shall be privileged with regard to the interpreter. The bill also amends Code chapter 622B, which provides for sign language interpreters for deaf and hard-of-hearing persons. The bill provides that in addition to a court or administrative agency being able to inquire into the qualifications and integrity of a sign language interpreter, the court or administrative agency may also inquire into the neutrality of the sign language interpreter.11 provides appropriations for indigent defense. The bill provides that costs and fees associated with interpreters are not payable from the indigent defense fund. The result of the bill, in part, is that the judicial branch, through the state court administrator, is to assume responsibility for the review and payment of interpreter and translator claims formerly paid from the indigent defense fund. The bill provides that moneys appropriated to the indigent defense fund for the payment of interpreters and translators during the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021, and ending June 30, 2022, shall be used by the state public defender for payment of costs and fees of interpreters and translators received prior to the effective date of the bill. Moneys appropriated to the indigent defense fund for the payment of interpreters and translators during the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021, and ending June 30, 2022, that have not yet been disbursed by the state public defender as of the effective date of the bill shall be transferred to the revolving fund under the purview of the judicial branch for jury and witness fees, mileage, costs related to summoning jurors, costs and fees for interpreters and translators, and reimbursement of attorney fees paid by the state public defender for that fiscal year. The bill takes effect November 1, 2021.

Cambiado después por la enmienda H-1152; vea Enmiendas.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse2

Senate subcommittee

Named March 9, 2021. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Nota fiscal

Cost: up to $500,000 Compare con otros proyectos

Resumen con IA This bill changes how the state pays for interpreters and translators in legal proceedings by moving those costs from the Indigent Defense Fund to the Jury and Witness Revolving Fund. It is estimated that the Jury and Witness Revolving Fund will see an increase in costs of approximately $500,000 beginning in fiscal year 2022. The Indigent Defense Fund is expected to see savings of approximately the same amount. (en inglés)3

Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)

Description

House File 707 relates to interpreters and translators for limited-English-proficient (LEP) persons and sign language interpreters for deaf and hard-of-hearing persons in legal proceedings. The Bill provides that the State Court Administrator is to receive, review, and pay fee claims for interpreters and translators from the Jury and Witness Revolving Fund established in Iowa Code section 602.1302(3).

The Bill also provides that costs and fees associated with interpreters and translators are not payable from the Indigent Defense Fund. The result of the Bill, in part, is that the Judicial Branch is to assume responsibility for the review and payment of interpreter and translator claims formerly paid by the Indigent Defense Fund.

Funding appropriated to the Indigent Defense Fund in FY 2021 is to be used by the State Public Defender for payment of costs and fees of interpreters and translators received prior to the effective date of this Bill. The Bill takes effect on July 1, 2021.

Background

Currently, four State agencies may pay oral language interpreters, depending on the case type and economic status of the person needing an interpreter:

  • State Public Defender — Pays interpreters who work on behalf of indigent parties who are LEP and who are represented by assigned counsel in criminal and juvenile cases.
  • Local Public Defender Field Offices — Pays interpreters who work on behalf of indigent parties represented by public defenders in criminal and juvenile cases.
  • Counties — Pays all sign language interpreters in court proceedings and oral language interpreters who assist LEP persons who are subjects of mental health commitment proceedings.
  • State Court Administrator — Pays interpreters appointed for LEP parties in all other cases.

Assumptions

  • Oral language interpreter fees for LEP indigent persons represented by public defenders or court-appointed counsel will be the same in FY 2022 as those expenses were in FY 2019, and similar to prior fiscal years. Table 1 shows the court interpreter fees paid by the State Public Defender from the Indigent Defense Fund for the last four fiscal years. Table 1 — Court Interpreter Fees Paid by the State Public Defender
  • Since the pandemic significantly reduced the number of court proceedings and demand for interpreters during March through June 2020, the FY 2020 interpreter expenses are not indicative of future costs.FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 414,096$ 447,989$ 499,876$ 292,196$
  • The Indigent Defense Fund currently pays out approximately $42,000 in interpreter fees per month.

Fiscal Impact

House File 707 is estimated to increase funding and costs to the Jury and Witness Revolving Fund by approximately $500,000 beginning in FY 2022. Currently, the State Public Defender pays these interpreter fees from the Indigent Defense Fund. The Bill will transfer those costs to the Revolving Fund. As a result, the Indigent Defense Fund will experience a savings of approximately the same amount.

Sources

  • Office of the State Public Defender
  • Judicial Branch

El cálculo no cambió

  1. $500,000 17 de febrero de 2021
  2. $500,000 3 de marzo de 2021
  3. $500,000 8 de marzo de 2021
  4. $500,000 11 de marzo de 2021
  5. $500,000 8 de junio de 2021 · final
4

Cómo leer una nota fiscal5

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§622A.9

Modifica§331.424§622A.1§622A.2§622A.3§622A.4§622A.5§622A.6§622A.7§622A.8§622B.1§622B.2§622B.3§622B.4§622B.5§622B.6§622B.7§622B.8§815.11

Cómo funciona el Código6

Cabildeo

2 a favor · 0 en contra · 6 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.

  • HF 2558 Relating to interpreters for limited-English-proficient, deaf, and hard-of-hearing persons…
    88th General Assembly · Approved by committee · very similar
    Cleared committee

Matched by wording or an identical title.