Bills › 89th General Assembly
Relating to qualified immunity, the peace officer, public safety, and emergency personnel bill of rights, uniform commercial code filings, and protected information of law enforcement officers and state or federal judicial officers and prosecutors, and including effective date provisions
Sponsored by the Senate State Government Committee
Topics:Courts & civil lawCrime & correctionsPublic safety & emergencies
Same legislation: SSB 1178
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 9, 2021
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 9, 2021
- Done: Senate committeeFebruary 24, 2021
- Done: Passes the SenateMarch 8, 202136–12
- Done: House committeeMarch 24, 2021
- Stopped: Passes the HouseDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2022 session adjourned on May 24, 2022, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Law enforcement officers are protected from being sued for damages if they did not violate a clearly established legal right while performing their duties. This bill also changes the rules for how complaints against officers are handled, giving them more rights to legal counsel and protecting their personal information from the public. Additionally, it allows certain officials to have their names hidden from public electronic documents and protects private conversations between emergency workers and their counselors.1
Read the official explanation
This bill relates to qualified immunity of law enforcement officers, the peace officer, public safety, and emergency personnel bill of rights, uniform commercial code filings, and protected information of law enforcement officers and state or federal judicial officers and prosecutors. The bill is organized into divisions. DIVISION I —— QUALIFIED IMMUNITY. Under the bill, the general assembly finds that qualified immunity is intended for all law enforcement officers except for law enforcement officers who are incompetent or knowingly violate the law and that as the United States supreme court has observed, qualified immunity balances the need to hold law enforcement officers accountable when law enforcement officers exercise their power irresponsibly and the need to shield law enforcement officers from harassment, distraction, and liability when law enforcement officers perform their duties reasonably. The bill defines “law enforcement officer” to mean any federal, state, tribal, or local official who is authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or incarceration of any person for any violation of law, and has statutory powers of arrest, apprehension, detention, or incarceration. “Law enforcement officers” include but are not limited to peace officers, employees of the department of public safety, employees of the department of corrections, and employees of a judicial district’s department of correctional services. The bill defines “action for damages” to mean any case brought in a court organized under the laws of this state in which the plaintiff seeks any amount of monetary compensation, including but not limited to claims alleging constitutional or statutory violations. The bill defines “constitution” to mean the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Iowa. The bill defines “other law” to mean any statutory or common law, whether federal or state. The bill provides that a law enforcement officer subject to any action for damages in the law enforcement officer’s individual capacity shall not be found liable if such law enforcement officer is entitled to qualified immunity. If a constitutional or statutory right was not clearly established at the time of the alleged deprivation by the law enforcement officer, or at that time, the state of the law was not sufficiently clear that a reasonable law enforcement officer would have understood that the conduct alleged constituted a violation of law, then the officer is entitled to qualified immunity. The plaintiff must plead facts showing that the law enforcement officer violated a right, and bears the burden of establishing that the alleged right was clearly established at the time the law enforcement officer’s conduct occurred. The bill provides liability protection for an agency or political subdivision who employed a law enforcement officer subject to an action governed under the new Code chapter shall not be liable if the law enforcement officer is found not liable under the provisions of the bill and the law enforcement officer was acting within the scope of employment with the agency or political subdivision. The bill provides that the applicability of the new Code chapter supersedes any other provision of Iowa law that provides less protection to law enforcement officers. DIVISION II —— PEACE OFFICER, PUBLIC SAFETY, AND EMERGENCY PERSONNEL BILL OF RIGHTS.1 (peace officer, public safety, and emergency personnel bill of rights) to mean a formal written allegation signed by the complainant or a signed written statement by an officer receiving an oral complaint stating the complainant’s allegation. The bill provides that an officer shall be immediately notified in writing of any preliminary results from a formal administrative investigation and any recommendations for the disposition of the complaint and discipline. Upon initiation of the formal administrative investigation, an officer shall be promptly served with written notice of the complaint, be informed of the officer’s right to counsel, and be provided with a copy of the peace officer bill of rights. The written notice shall include: names of all the complainants, alleged date of the occurrence, summary of the factual allegations, and the name and rank or title of the investigator in charge of the formal administrative investigation. The bill provides that the officer shall have a right to legal counsel at the expense of the officer during the interview, hearings, or other disciplinary or administrative proceedings related to the complaint. The officer’s legal counsel, union representative, or employee representative shall not be compelled to disclose during any judicial proceeding any information received from the officer under investigation or from an agent of the officer. An officer’s legal counsel, union representative, or employee representative shall not be subject to any investigation or punitive action for refusing to disclose any information. The bill provides that the officer and officer’s legal counsel may coordinate and communicate in confidence with the officer’s designated union representative or employee representative and those communications shall not be subject to discovery. The bill provides that if a formal administrative investigation results in removal, discharge, suspension, or other disciplinary action against the officer, the complete investigative reports shall be timely provided to the officer or officer’s legal counsel upon request at the completion of the investigation. The bill provides that an officer’s personal information shall be redacted from any record prior to the record’s release to the public. An officer’s photograph or unredacted personal information may be released to the officer’s legal counsel, union representative, or designated employee representative upon the officer’s request. The bill provides that an officer may bring a private cause of action, including but not limited to an action for money damages, against any person for filing a false complaint against the officer. The bill provides that an officer’s personal information, including certain personal information specified in the bill, shall be confidential and shall be redacted from any record prior to the record’s release to the public by an employing agency. The bill provides that the following information shall also be kept confidential: an officer’s statement, recordings, or transcripts of any interviews or disciplinary proceedings, and any complaints made against an officer. The bill provides that an agency shall provide training to any person who performs or supervises an investigation under the bill. The Iowa law enforcement academy shall adopt minimum training standards not inconsistent with the bill including training standards concerning interviewing an officer subject to a complaint. The bill provides that upon request, the employing agency shall provide to a requesting officer or the officer’s legal counsel a copy of the officer’s personnel file and training records regardless of whether the officer is subject to a formal administrative investigation at the time of the request. DIVISION III —— FRAUDULENT FILINGS —— UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE. The bill provides that a filing office may refuse to accept a financing statement that is determined to not have been created pursuant to the UCC, is intended for an improper purpose, names the same person as both the debtor and the secured party, describes collateral not within the scope of applicable law, or is filed for a purpose other than a transaction within the scope of the UCC. If the filing office becomes aware that a financial statement or other record was not created pursuant to the UCC or was intended for an improper purpose, the filing office shall review the record and relevant circumstance, and determine if the record was wrongfully filed. If the record is wrongfully filed, it shall be deemed void and ineffective and the filing office shall remove the record from the index and communicate that to the person who filed the record and to other persons, as appropriate. DIVISION IV —— PROTECTED INFORMATION. The bill provides that upon request by a law enforcement officer, state or federal judicial officer or prosecutor, the recorder or the recorder’s staff shall redact the requester’s name contained in electronic documents displayed for public access, unless the person is holding or seeking public office. A fee shall not be charged to redact the requester’s name. The bill provides that a peer support group counselor or individual present for a group crisis intervention who obtains information from a law enforcement officer, fire fighter, or civilian employee of a law enforcement agency or fire department shall not be allowed, in giving testimony, to disclose any confidential communication properly entrusted to the counselor or individual by the law enforcement officer, fire fighter, or civilian employee while receiving counseling. However, the law enforcement officer, fire fighter, or civilian employee may consent to the disclosure. Under current law, this evidentiary rule applies to communications between peer support group counselors and law enforcement officers or fire fighters.
Changed since by amendment S-3049; see Amendments.
House subcommittee
Named March 23, 2021. On March 24, 2021 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 2-1.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Iowa Code it changes
Creates§669A.1§669A.2§669A.3§669A.4§669A.5
Lobbying
3 for · 11 against · 18 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Study bill
89th General Assembly