Bills › 89th General Assembly
Limiting civil liability for persons involved in agricultural tourism
Sponsored by the Senate Agriculture Committee
Topics:AgricultureCourts & civil law
Same legislation: SSB 1153
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 3, 2021
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 3, 2021
- Done: Senate committeeFebruary 11, 2021
- Done: Passes the SenateFebruary 23, 202130–18
- Done: House committeeApril 2, 2021
- Done: Passes the HouseApril 27, 202153–40
- Done: To the GovernorMay 19, 2021
- Done: Signed into lawMay 19, 2021
Signed into law What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Farm owners and workers would have less legal responsibility if a visitor gets hurt due to common farming risks, ignoring instructions, or entering off-limits areas. To use this protection, farms must post a clear warning sign where visitors enter and include the notice in any signed contracts. This law does not protect farmers if they act intentionally, break the law, or are extremely reckless.1
Read the official explanation
1).4). The bill provides that a farming activity includes both the production or maintenance of a farm commodity (farm animals and crops) on the agricultural tourism farm and the on-farm processing of a farm commodity produced or maintained on that farm.4). As a condition of being able to plead an affirmative defense to liability, a notice must be posted in a conspicuous location where the agricultural tourist is first allowed to enter the premises.6).7). The bill provides that other statutes that shield liability for an act or omission may be asserted in addition to the shield created in the bill. , fairs, rodeos, and expositions).
Changed since by amendment H-1337; see Amendments.
House subcommittee
Named March 2, 2021. Meeting: Monday, March 8 · 1:15 PM · House Lounge.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Iowa Code it changes
Creates§461C.10§673.6§673A.1§673A.2§673A.3§673A.4§673A.5§673A.6§673A.7
Lobbying
2 for · 4 against · 18 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Study bill
89th General Assembly