Bills › 89th General Assembly
Relating to the dissemination of certain specified materials, including the prohibition of certain specified materials in schools and school libraries, civil actions to determine obscenity, and providing penalties
Sponsored by the Senate Judiciary Committee
Topics:Courts & civil lawK–12 educationProfessional licensingBooks & libraries
Same legislation: SF 2198
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 3, 2022
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 9, 2022
- Done: Senate committeeFebruary 21, 2022
- Stopped: Passes the SenateDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: House committee
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2022 session adjourned on May 24, 2022, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary School administrators and teachers are prohibited from providing obscene material or hard-core pornography to students in school libraries or through classroom lessons. If these rules are broken, the staff members could face criminal charges or lose their teaching licenses. Parents can also sue their child's school in court if these laws are violated.1
Read the official explanation
This bill relates to the dissemination of certain specified materials, including the prohibition of certain specified materials in schools and school libraries and civil actions to determine obscenity. The bill requires a school to designate at least one administrator to ensure that no obscene material or hard-core pornography is present and available to students in a library operated by the school that the administrator supervises or directs. The bill prohibits an administrator from knowingly providing obscene material to a student in a library operated by the school that the administrator supervises or directs. The bill provides that an administrator who violates this provision is guilty of a serious misdemeanor. Additionally, the bill prohibits an administrator from knowingly providing hard-core pornography to a student in a library operated by the school that the administrator supervises or directs. The bill provides that an administrator who violates this provision is guilty of an aggravated misdemeanor. The bill also prohibits a teacher from knowingly requiring a student to read or view obscene material as part of the teacher’s instructional program or curriculum. The bill provides that a teacher who violates this provision is guilty of a serious misdemeanor. The bill prohibits a teacher from knowingly requiring a student to read or view hard-core pornography as part of the teacher’s instructional program or curriculum. The bill provides that a teacher who violates this provision is guilty of an aggravated misdemeanor. A serious misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than one year and a fine of at least $430 but not more than $2,560. An aggravated misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than two years and a fine of at least $855 but not more than $8,540. The bill requires the board of educational examiners to adopt rules that require the board to disqualify an applicant for a license or to revoke a person’s license for a violation of these provisions. The bill authorizes a parent or guardian of a student alleging a violation of the bill’s provisions to bring a civil action for injunctive relief against the school that employs an administrator or teacher in violation of the bill. The bill requires a court to award reasonable attorney fees to a parent or guardian who prevails in this civil action. The bill provides that if a parent or guardian is the prevailing party in the civil action, the court shall assess a civil penalty against the school that employs the administrator or teacher, not to exceed $500 per day for each day a violation occurs during the pendency of the civil action, unless certain limited exceptions apply. The bill requires revenue from the civil penalty to be remitted to the treasurer of state for deposit in the general fund of the state. The bill provides that if a parent or guardian is the prevailing party in the civil action, the clerk of court shall send a copy of the court’s order and a copy of the law by certified mail to the attorney general and to the county attorney of the county in which the school that employs the administrator or teacher who violated the bill’s provisions is located. The bill provides that a parent or guardian who was the prevailing party in the civil action may bring a civil action for damages against the school that employs the administrator or teacher if the administrator or teacher violates the injunction. The bill requires the clerk of court to send a copy of the court’s order issued pursuant to the proceedings related to the violation of the injunction, and a copy of the law, by certified mail to the board of educational examiners. The bill also provides that if the parent or guardian is the prevailing party in these proceedings, the court shall award the parent or guardian actual damages for injuries resulting from the administrator’s or teacher’s initial violation of the bill’s provisions and a civil penalty not less than $1,000 per day for each day the administrator’s or teacher’s violation of the injunction continues. The bill waives immunity for charter schools and school districts in any cause of action brought against those entities under the bill. The bill requires the board of educational examiners to suspend the license of an administrator or a teacher upon the board’s finding by a preponderance of the evidence that the administrator or teacher violated an injunction. The bill authorizes a county attorney or the attorney general to institute criminal or civil actions to enforce the provisions of the bill. The bill provides that a county attorney’s or the attorney general’s receipt of a copy of a court’s injunctive order provided by the clerk of court, along with subsequent information that a violation of the bill’s provisions is continuing to occur, shall constitute probable cause that a violation of the bill’s criminal provisions has occurred.4 (rental or sale of hard-core pornography) provides that a person who knowingly rents, sells, or offers for rental or sale hard-core pornography is guilty of an aggravated misdemeanor.4 by a person who has been previously convicted of violating this Code section are class “D” felonies.4, the person has a prior conviction or a deferred judgment for violating the bill’s provisions related to providing hard-core pornography to a student in a library or related to requiring a student to read or view hard-core pornography as part of an instructional program.4. Current law authorizes a county attorney to institute a civil proceeding to enjoin the dissemination or exhibition of obscene material to minors when the county attorney has reasonable cause to believe that any person is engaged or plans to engage in the dissemination or exhibition of obscene material within the county attorney’s county to minors. The bill establishes that the attorney general may institute such civil proceedings as well. Current law provides that Code chapter 728 does not prohibit the use of appropriate material for educational purposes in any accredited school, public library, or educational program in which the minor is participating, and does not prohibit the attendance of minors at an exhibition or display of art works or the use of any materials in any public library. The bill provides that, for purposes of this provision, appropriate material does not include obscene material or hard-core pornography. The bill contains definitions for “administrator”, “hard-core pornography”, “school”, “student”, and “teacher”.
Fiscal note
AI summary This bill requires the Board of Educational Examiners to disqualify or revoke the licenses of educators who provide obscene material or hard-core pornography to students. While the bill does not have a fiscal impact to the state, it may impact schools through increased litigation and could lead county attorney offices to hire more staff. The correctional impact of creating these new criminal offenses cannot be determined at this time.3
Read the fiscal note
Description
Senate File 2364 requires the Board of Educational Examiners (BOEE) to disqualify an applicant for a license or revoke the license of a person for providing obscene material or hard-core pornography to students from a school library or requiring a student to read or view such material. “Obscene materials” is defined in Iowa Code section 728.1, and a definition of “hard-core pornography” is established in the Bill. The BOEE is required to suspend the license of an administrator or teacher upon the Board’s finding by a preponderance of evidence that the administrator or teacher violated an injunction as detailed in the Bill. Public school districts, accredited nonpublic schools, and charter schools will be required to designate one administrator to ensure that no obscene material or hard-core pornography is present and available to students in a school library under the administrator’s supervision. An administrator who knowingly provides obscene material to a student in a library operated by the school under the administrator’s supervision will be guilty of a serious misdemeanor. An administrator who knowingly provides hard-core pornography to a student in a library under the administrator’s supervision will be guilty of an aggravated misdemeanor. A teacher who knowingly requires a student to read or view obscene material as part of an instructional program or curriculum will be guilty of a serious misdemeanor. A teacher who knowingly requires a student to read or view hard-core pornography as part of an instructional program or curriculum will be guilty of an aggravated misdemeanor.
Civil action for injunctive relief, as detailed in the Bill, is provided for parents or guardians, including the awarding of penalties and fees if the parent or guardian is found to be the prevailing party. The clerk of court will send a copy of the court’s order issued pertaining to a violation, of the Bill to the Attorney General and county attorney.
A parent or guardian who is the prevailing party in civil action for injunctive relief may bring a civil action for damages against the school that employs the administrator or teacher if the administrator or teacher violates an injunction issued related to the Bill. Potential damages to be awarded are detailed in the Bill.
A county attorney or the Attorney General may initiate criminal or civil actions to enforce the provisions of the Bill.
“Appropriate material” for educational purposes in any accredited school, public library, or educational program is defined as not including obscene material or hard-core pornography.
Background
Under current law, violations of Iowa Code section 728.2 involving the dissemination or exhibition of obscene materials to a minor is considered a serious misdemeanor. An aggravated misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for up to two years and a fine of at least $855 but not more than $8,540. A serious misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for up to one year and a fine of at least $430 but not more than $2,560.
Assumptions
- The following will not change over the projection period: charge, conviction, and sentencing patterns and trends; prisoner length of stay (LOS); revocation rates; plea bargaining; and other criminal justice system policies and practices.
- A lag effect of six months is assumed from the effective date of this Bill to the date of first entry of affected offenders into the correctional system.
- Marginal costs for county jails cannot be estimated due to a lack of data. For purposes of this analysis, the marginal cost for county jails is assumed to be $50 per day.
Correctional Impact
Senate File 2364 creates a new criminal offense specific to school administrators and teachers, and the correctional impact cannot be determined at this time. Table 1 below shows estimates for sentencing to State prisons, parole, probation, or community-based corrections (CBC) residential facilities; LOS under those supervisions; and supervision marginal costs per day for all convictions of aggravated misdemeanors for sex offenses and serious misdemeanors. Refer to the Legislative Services Agency (LSA) memo addressed to the General Assembly, Cost Estimates Used for Correctional Impact Statements, dated January 18, 2022, for information related to the correctional system.
Table 1 — Sentencing Estimates and Length of Stay (LOS)
Minority Impact
Senate File 2364 is estimated to have an unknown minority impact. Of the 10 convictions for dissemination and exhibition of obscene materials to minors under Iowa Code section 728.2 in FY 2021, 88.1% were White and 1.3% were African American, while the Iowa population is 85.3% White and 3.9% African American. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Minority Impact Statement, dated January 18, 2022, for information related to minorities in the criminal justice system.Conviction
Offense Class
Percent
Ordered
to State
Prison
FY 21 Avg
LOS in
Prison in
Months
(All Releases) FY 21
Marginal
Cost Per
Day
Prison
Percent
Ordered
to
Probation
Avg LOS
on
Probation
in Months FY 21 Avg
Cost Per
Day
Probation
Percent
Sentenced
to CBC
Residential
Facility
FY 21
Marginal
Cost Per
Day CBC
Percent
Ordered
to
County
Jail
Marginal
Cost Per
Day Jail
Avg LOS
on
Parole in
Months
FY 21
Marginal
Cost Per
Day
Parole
Aggravated
Misdemeanor
(Sex Offense) 80.1% 14.5 $23.33 58.5% 25.0 $7.01 1.1% $17.78 74.6% $50.00 26.9 $7.01
Serious
Misdemeanor 1.8% 6.5 $23.33 56.0% 14.5 $7.01 0.9% $17.78 69.0% $50.00 18.1 $7.01
Fiscal Impact
Senate File 2364 does not have a fiscal impact to the State. However, there may be a fiscal impact to schools related to increased future exposure to litigation. In addition, county attorney offices may hire additional staff to handle complaints as outlined in the Bill.
Sources
- Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning Division, Department of Human Rights
- Iowa County Attorneys Association
- Legislative Services Agency
- Obscene Material, Schools · February 28, 2022
Iowa Code it changes
Creates§728.2A
Lobbying
5 for · 23 against · 6 undecided · Who →
Family tree
89th General Assembly
Similar bills
- HF 361 Relating to the dissemination of certain specified materials, including the prohibition of…90th General Assembly · In committeeSimilar
Matched by wording or an identical title.