Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General

SF 2319Murió al terminar la sesión · 17 de febrero de 2022

Prohibiting the use of automated or remote systems for traffic law enforcement, including prohibiting the sharing of related information and requiring the removal of existing systems, and including effective date provisions

Presentado por el comité Judiciary del Senado

Temas:TaxesTransportation

La misma legislación: SSB 3012

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado12 de enero de 2022
  2. Hecho: Subcomité12 de enero de 2022
  3. Hecho: Comité del Senado16 de febrero de 2022
  4. Se detuvo: Lo aprueba el SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  5. Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2022 terminó el 24 de mayo de 2022, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA Iowa would stop state and local governments from using cameras or other remote devices to automatically catch people breaking traffic laws. This rule prevents agencies from sharing information to collect fines from these automated systems. Any local laws that allowed these devices would no longer be valid. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill prohibits the state or a local authority from placing or causing to be placed on or adjacent to a highway, or maintaining or employing the use of, any automated or remote system for traffic law enforcement (ATE system). The bill prohibits the department of transportation and the department of public safety from providing information used to impose or collect a civil penalty that results from a violation captured by an ATE system through an existing interstate compact agreement unless the agreement specifically allows or requires that information to be shared or provided for that specific purpose. The bill defines “automated or remote system for traffic law enforcement” to mean a camera or other optical device designed to work in conjunction with an official traffic control signal or speed measuring device to identify motor vehicles operating in violation of traffic laws, the use of which results in the issuance of citations sent through the mail or by electronic means. The bill requires that prior to July 1, 2022, a local authority using an ATE system must discontinue using the system and remove the system equipment. On and after July 1, 2022, all local ordinances authorizing the use of ATE systems are void. However, the bill provides that any citation issued or mailed pursuant to such an ordinance prior to July 1, 2022, is not invalidated by the bill and must be processed according to the provisions of law under which the citation was authorized. This provision of the bill takes effect upon enactment.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)2

Senate subcommittee

Named March 10, 2022. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Nota fiscal

Less revenue: up to $65,000 Compare con otros proyectos

Resumen con IA Senate File 2319 prohibits state and local authorities from using automated or remote systems for traffic enforcement on or near highways and requires the removal of all existing devices by July 1, 2022. This bill is estimated to reduce annual revenue to the Department of Administrative Services by $65,000 in fiscal year 2023. Additionally, the bill is estimated to decrease revenue to local authorities by at least $14.6 million per fiscal year. (en inglés)3

Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)

Description

Senate File 2319 prohibits the use of automated or remote systems for traffic enforcement (ATE) by State and local authorities on or adjacent to a highway. Under the Bill, information used to impose or collect a civil penalty that results from a violation that was captured using an ATE is not to be shared between the Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Department of Public Safety (DPS). This Bill requires the removal of all existing ATE devices by July 1, 2022. Citations issued before July 1, 2022, remain enforceable under the Bill. The Bill is effective upon enactment.

Background

As of February 2022, there are eight cities in Iowa that operate ATE devices, including Fort Dodge, Council Bluffs, Waterloo, Muscatine, Sioux City, Davenport, Cedar Rapids, and Des Moines. This does not include the city of Windsor Heights. Windsor Heights ceased operating ATE devices April 21, 2020. The data for ATE devices in Fort Dodge, Council Bluffs, and Waterloo is currently not available, and therefore these cities are not included this analysis. In January 2014, the DOT adopted an administrative rule that regulated the use of ATE devices on the primary road system. In April 2018, the Iowa Supreme Court ruled that the DOT did not have the authority to regulate ATE devices.

Polk County declined to renew its vendor contract for ATE devices and ceased issuing violations from its two mobile units in December 2017; Ottumwa ceased operating ATE devices in October 2018.

Under Iowa Code section 8A.504, the Department of Administrative Services (DAS) operates the Iowa Offset Program which can withhold certain State payments on behalf of local authorities to individuals and companies that do not pay their ATE violations. The DAS charges $7 per violation collected to offset the costs of administering the Program. Fees are deposited into the DAS general operating budget.

The cities of Council Bluffs, Davenport, Des Moines, Fort Dodge, Muscatine, and Windsor Heights participated in the Program in FY 2018. Cedar Rapids has a signed agreement with the Iowa Offset Program; however, as of February 2019, the city is not submitting any unpaid violations for collection. Waterloo began participation in the Iowa Offset Program in September 2018 (FY 2019).

Assumptions

  • All existing ATE devices will cease operation on or before July 1, 2022. Table 1 provides data on the number of ATE devices, base cost per violation, vendor’s share, and share of local authorities’ revenues.
  • All citations issued prior to July 1, 2022, will remain valid.
  • Automated traffic enforcement device-issued citations will not be submitted for offset after June 30, 2023.
  • Assumes citations at FY 2021 level would have occurred if the Bill had not been passed.

Fiscal Impact

Senate File 2319 is estimated to reduce annual revenue to DAS by $65,000 in FY 2023. While cities have discretion on submitting unpaid citations to the Iowa Offset Program, given the stated assumptions the revenue decrease would occur in FY 2023.

The Bill is estimated to decrease revenue to local authorities by at least an estimated $14.6 million per fiscal year. This estimate does not include the decrease in local revenue to Fort Dodge, Council Bluffs, and Waterloo. Table 1 includes information obtained by the Legislative Services Agency (LSA) for the last full fiscal year. Table 2 shows each city’s use of ATE revenue and which cities participate in the Iowa Offset Program.Local Number of Number of Number of Base Fine Vendor Local Authority Authority Operating ATEs Violations Issued Violations Collected Per Violation* Revenue Revenue** Cedar Rapids 27 171,919 105,108 75$ 2,336,035$ 8,094,784$ Davenport 18 47,013 23,152 65 506,457 1,017,176 Des Moines 9 102,138 71,687 65 1,738,092 2,921,510 Sioux City 8 15,246 20,956 100 629,515 2,028,155 Muscatine 9 10,675 9,368 75 253,152 565,265 Totals 71 346,991 230,271 5,463,251$ 14,626,890$ * Lowest violation amount. Actual violation amounts may increase depending on miles over the legal speed limit. ** Collected revenue may include fine moneys collected through the Iowa Offset Program for violations issued in prior years. *** Fort Dodge, Council Bluffs, and Waterloo are not included in revenue totals. Source: Local authorities Table 1 Estimated Violations and Revenues from ATE Devices*** (As of February 2022)Authority Uses Offset Program Cedar Rapids Police Department Operating Fund Yes

Davenport General Fund No

Des Moines Des Moines Public Safety Radio System Yes

Muscatine Police Department No

Sioux City Public Safety Projects No

Windsor Heights General Fund No

Table 2

Local Uses of ATE Revenues

Sources

  • Iowa Department of Transportation
  • Local authorities
  • LSA calculations
  • Department of Administrative Services

Cómo leer una nota fiscal4

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§321.492C

Cómo funciona el Código5

Cabildeo

3 a favor · 7 en contra · 8 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None became law, though one got through a chamber.

  • SF 343 Prohibiting the use of automated or remote systems for traffic law enforcement, including …
    88th General Assembly · Passed Senate · similar
    Passed a chamber
  • HSB 125 HSB 125
    88th General Assembly · Approved by committee · similar
    Cleared committee

Similar bills this General Assembly

  • HF 249 Prohibiting the use of automated or remote systems for traffic law enforcement, including …
    89th General Assembly · In committee
    Very similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.