Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General
Relating to prohibitions on noncompete covenants and including applicability provisions
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado16 de febrero de 2022
- Hecho: Subcomité23 de febrero de 2022
- Se detuvo: Comité del SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2022 terminó el 24 de mayo de 2022, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA New rules would stop employers from using certain noncompete agreements that prevent workers from taking new jobs. These rules protect employees who earn less than 150 percent of the state minimum wage, and they also limit restrictions on higher-paid workers unless the employer can prove a specific need. If an employer breaks these rules, they may have to pay fines or compensate the worker for lost wages and legal fees. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to noncompete covenants contained within employment contracts and provisions that are prohibited and void. The bill provides definitions for “covenant not to solicit”, “earnings”, and “noncompete covenant”. The bill provides that if a person makes less than 150 percent of the minimum wage, a noncompete covenant is unenforceable and violates the bill. The bill provides that a noncompete covenant with a non-low-wage employee is unenforceable and violates the bill unless the employer can show that the noncompete covenant is necessary due to a clear and inherent risk of unfair competition and the noncompete covenant was narrowly tailored to mitigate the risk. A prevailing employee is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees, court costs, lost wages, and at the discretion of the court, liquidated damages of up to triple the amount of lost wages for willful violations of the bill. An employer found to be in violation of the bill is subject to a $5,000 penalty per violation payable to the division of labor for deposit in the general fund. The bill applies to covenants not to compete entered into on or after the effective date of the bill.
Senate subcommittee
Named February 23, 2022. It hasn’t reported yet.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Cabildeo
1 a favor · 0 en contra · 7 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
89th General Assembly
Picked up later
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Similar bills
- SF 304 Relating to prohibitions on noncompete covenants and including applicability provisions90th General Assembly · In committeeVery similar
- SF 380 Relating to prohibitions on noncompete covenants involving nurses and including applicabil…91st General Assembly · In committeeSimilar
- SF 426 Relating to prohibitions on noncompete covenants involving nurses and including applicabil…90th General Assembly · In committeeSimilar
Matched by wording or an identical title.