Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General
Relating to the apportionment of district associate judges
Presentado por el comité Judiciary del Senado
Temas:Courts & civil law
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado12 de enero de 2022
- Hecho: Subcomité12 de enero de 2022
- Hecho: Comité del Senado8 de febrero de 2022
- Se detuvo: Lo aprueba el SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Se saltó: Comité de la CámaraSe saltó
- Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara23 de febrero de 202297–0
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2022 terminó el 24 de mayo de 2022, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA Instead of using county population to decide how many district associate judges are needed, this bill uses a formula based on how much work they actually do. If a judge leaves their job, the vacancy will only be filled if the new formula shows that the area still needs that many judges. Current judges will not be removed from their positions even if the new rules mean their area needs fewer people. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to the apportionment of district associate judges. The bill provides a new formula to be prescribed when appointing judges based upon a weighted workload. Under current law, district associate judges are apportioned based upon county population. The bill defines the term “vacancy” to mean the death, resignation, retirement, or removal of a district associate judge, or the failure of a district associate judge to be retained in office at the judicial election, or an increase in judgeships. The bill provides that in districts that currently have more district associate judges than the new formulas prescribed, vacancies shall not be filled and incumbents shall not be removed because of a reduction in number of authorized judgeships, while districts having fewer or the same shall fill vacancies as they occur. In judicial districts that contain more than one judicial election district, a vacancy in a judicial election district shall not be filled if the total number of district associate judges in all judicial election districts within the judicial district equals or exceeds the aggregate number of judgeships to which all of the judicial election districts of the judicial district are authorized.
Senate subcommittee
Named January 12, 2022 (as SSB 3020). On January 26, 2022 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Modifica§602.6301
Cabildeo
3 a favor · 0 en contra · 5 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Study bill
89th General Assembly