Bills › 89th General Assembly
Eliminating specific requirements relating to no smoking signs or symbols
Sponsored by the Senate Commerce Committee
Topics:Business & economy
Same legislation: SSB 3030
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedJanuary 13, 2022
- Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 18, 2022
- Done: Senate committeeFebruary 2, 2022
- Stopped: Passes the SenateDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: House committee
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2022 session adjourned on May 24, 2022, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary People who run businesses or locations where smoking is already banned would no longer be required to post specific "no smoking" signs or symbols. If a business owner chooses to make their entire area smoke-free on their own, they must then post a sign or symbol to let people know that smoking is not allowed.1
Read the official explanation
The inclusion of this explanation does not constitute agreement with the explanation’s substance by the members of the general assembly. This bill eliminates specific requirements relating to the posting of a “no smoking” sign or the international “no smoking” symbol by the owner, operator, manager, or other person having custody or control of a location where smoking is prohibited pursuant to Code chapter 142D (smokefree air Act). The bill provides that if an owner, operator, manager, or other person having custody or control of an area otherwise exempt from the smoking prohibitions under Code chapter 142D voluntarily declares the entire area as a nonsmoking place, smoking is then prohibited in an area declared a nonsmoking place if a “no smoking” sign or the international “no smoking” symbol is posted in order to provide adequate notice of the prohibition.
Senate subcommittee
Named January 18, 2022 (as SSB 3030). On February 2, 2022 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Iowa Code it changes
Lobbying
0 for · 0 against · 13 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Study bill
89th General Assembly