Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General

SF 2093Murió al terminar la sesión · 16 de febrero de 2022

Relating to accommodations in housing provided to persons with a disability-related need for assistance animals and service animals, and providing penalties

Temas:State governmentHousing & property

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado24 de enero de 2022
  2. Hecho: Subcomité2 de febrero de 2022
  3. Hecho: Comité del Senado16 de febrero de 2022
  4. Se detuvo: Lo aprueba el SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  5. Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2022 terminó el 24 de mayo de 2022, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA People who rent homes or apartments would have more protections and rules regarding service and assistance animals. Housing providers must make reasonable changes to their rules to allow these animals, but they can deny a request if the animal is dangerous or causes too much trouble. It is also a crime to lie about having a service animal, and certain paperwork must be provided to prove the animal is needed. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to reasonable housing accommodations for persons with assistance animals or service animals. The bill replaces the term “landlord” with “housing provider” in Code chapter 216. The bill provides that a housing provider make accommodations in its rules, policies, practices, and services for a person with an assistance or service animal that needs reasonable accommodations to afford the person equal opportunity to use and enjoy the dwelling. Under current law, a housing provider is only required to waive lease restrictions and additional pet payments for a person with an assistance or service animal. The bill provides that a housing provider may deny an accommodation request when granting the request would impose undue financial and administrative burden on the housing provider, would fundamentally change the nature of the housing provider’s operations, the specific animal in question poses a threat to health or safety of others that cannot be reduced or eliminated or would cause substantial physical damage to the property, or an accommodation is not otherwise reasonable. The bill provides that a person who misrepresents an animal as an assistance or service animal or provides the housing provider with false information regarding a claimed assistance or service animal commits a simple misdemeanor. A simple misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than days and a fine of at least $105 but not more than $855. The bill provides that a written finding that an assistance animal or service animal is a reasonable accommodation in housing from an approved licensee must include express confirmation that the licensee has met with the person within the past six months, the pair has a bona fide provider-patient relationship, the licensee has a physical Iowa location, and the licensee has not received compensation for making the finding. A housing provider may deny a request for a service animal or assistance animal accommodation for the type and number of animals requested by the person if the person failed to provide documentation or has a disability that is not readily apparent or known to the housing provider.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)2

Senate subcommittee

Named February 2, 2022. Meeting: Monday, February 14 · 12:30 PM · Room 217 Conference Room.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Nota fiscal

Can’t be estimated Compare con otros proyectos

Resumen con IA This bill requires housing providers to make accommodations for people with assistance or service animals and creates a simple misdemeanor for people who intentionally misrepresent an animal as a service animal. The fiscal impact of the new misdemeanor cannot be estimated, though one conviction could result in a fine between $105 and $855 and a cost to the state between $40 and $370. Additionally, the Iowa Civil Rights Commission could lose up to $530,000 in federal funding, which would require the state's General Fund to cover the loss. (en inglés)3

Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)

Description

Senate File 2093 relates to reasonable housing accommodations for persons with assistance or service animals. The Bill provides that a housing provider make accommodations in its rules, policies, practices, and services for a person with an assistance or service animal who needs reasonable accommodations to afford the person equal opportunity to use and enjoy the dwelling. The Bill also provides reasons that a housing provider may deny a request for an accommodation relating to an assistance or service animal.

Senate File 2093 provides that a person who knowingly and intentionally mispresents an animal as an assistance animal or service animal, or provides to a housing provider material information regarding a claimed assistance or service animal that is false, commits a simple misdemeanor. A simple misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for up to 30 days and a fine of between $105 and $855.

Background

Under current law, a housing provider who knowingly denies or interferes with the right of a person with a disability under Iowa Code section 216.8B commits a simple misdemeanor. The Iowa Civil Rights Commission (ICRC) has a workshare agreement with the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that is contingent on Iowa Code chapter 216 (the Iowa Civil Rights Act) being substantially similar to the federal Fair Housing Act.

Assumptions

  • The ICRC would no longer be eligible to receive federal HUD funding for cases involving assistance and service animals under Iowa Code sections 216.8B and 216.8C.
  • Patterns and trends related to complaints received by the ICRC will not change.
  • The following will not change over the projection period: charge, conviction, and sentencing patterns and trends, prisoner length of stay, revocation rates, plea bargaining, and other criminal justice system policies and practices.
  • A lag effect of six months is assumed from the effective date of this Bill to the date of first entry of affected offenders into the correctional system.
  • Marginal costs for county jails cannot be estimated due to a lack of data. For purposes of this analysis, the marginal cost for county jails is assumed to be $50 per day.

Correctional Impact

Senate File 2093 establishes a new offense. As a result, the correctional impact cannot be estimated due to a lack of existing data. A conviction for a simple misdemeanor does not result in a prison sentence, but does carry the possibility of confinement for up to 30 days. Marginal county jail costs are estimated to be $50 per day, but there is insufficient information to determine any costs related to length of stay.

Refer to the Legislative Services Agency (LSA) memo addressed to the General Assembly, Cost Estimates Used for Correctional Impact Statements, dated January 18, 2022, for information related to the correctional system.

Minority Impact

The minority impact of SF 2093 is unknown. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Minority Impact Statement, dated January 18, 2022, for information related to minorities in the criminal justice system.

Fiscal Impact

The fiscal impact of SF 2093 related to the creation of a simple misdemeanor cannot be estimated due to a lack of existing data. The estimated cost for one simple misdemeanor conviction ranges from $40 to $370. The estimated fine revenue from one simple misdemeanor conviction ranges from $105 to $855.

According to the ICRC, SF 2093 may result in the HUD providing funding for fewer disability-related housing cases or the HUD ending its workshare agreement with the ICRC. This would decrease federal funding for the ICRC by up to $530,000, which amounts to approximately 22.0% of the ICRC’s total annual budget. The ICRC anticipates that its total workload would not change and that it would seek to recover lost federal funds from the State General Fund.

Sources

  • Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning Division, Department of Human Rights
  • Iowa Civil Rights Commission

Cómo leer una nota fiscal4

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Modifica§216.8A§216.8B§216.8C

Cómo funciona el Código5

Cabildeo

12 a favor · 3 en contra · 6 indecisos · Quiénes →

Similar bills

  • HF 2486 Relating to accommodations in housing provided to persons with a disability-related need f…
    89th General Assembly · Approved by committee
    Nearly identical

Matched by wording or an identical title.