Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General
Relating to delayed deposit services by limiting the annual percentage rate for fees, requiring a delayed deposit repayment option in certain circumstances, and making penalties applicable
Temas:Business & economy
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado2 de febrero de 2021
- Hecho: Subcomité3 de febrero de 2021
- Se detuvo: Comité del SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2022 terminó el 24 de mayo de 2022, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA Companies that provide delayed deposit services would have to limit the interest rates they charge customers. If a person has multiple checks due or takes out many loans quickly, they can ask for a written plan to pay the money back in at least four equal installments. During this repayment period, the company cannot charge extra fees or start legal collections, but they can take action if a scheduled payment is missed. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill modifies provisions applicable to delayed deposit services. The bill limits the annual percentage rate applicable to a delayed deposit services transaction to percent, as computed pursuant to the federal Truth in Lending Act. The bill requires a licensee holding multiple checks from one maker at any one time to enter into an extended repayment plan agreement if the maker of the multiple checks requests to enter into such agreement prior to the date upon which the checks are to be negotiable. The licensee may not initiate debt collection, civil court proceedings, or arbitration to collect on the unpaid checks during the term of the extended repayment plan agreement. A licensee need only enter into one extended repayment plan agreement with a maker of multiple checks in a 12-month period. A licensee cannot charge a fee, interest charge, or other charge as a result of entering into an extended repayment plan agreement. During the duration of the agreement, the obligations that the maker owes on the unpaid checks are not delinquent and the licensee cannot charge penalties for a delinquent obligation. The bill allows a maker obtaining more than four delayed deposit service loans from one licensee in a two-month period to enter into an extended repayment plan agreement with the licensee if the maker requests to enter into such an agreement prior to the date upon which the last check accepted by the licensee is to be negotiable. The licensee may not initiate debt collection, civil court proceedings, or arbitration to collect on any unpaid checks during the term of the extended repayment plan agreement. A licensee need only enter into one extended repayment plan agreement with a maker in a 12-month period. A licensee cannot charge a fee, interest charge, or other charge as a result of entering into an extended repayment plan agreement. During the duration of the agreement, the obligations that the maker owes on any unpaid checks are not delinquent and the licensee cannot charge penalties for a delinquent obligation. The bill requires the extended repayment plan agreement to be in writing, signed by the maker and the licensee, and contain the schedule for payment of the total unpaid check obligations. The schedule must allow the maker to pay the checks in at least four substantially equal installments. The bill requires the licensee to return any postdated checks that the maker has given to the licensee for the original transactions. The licensee may then either require the maker to provide a new check for the balance on the unpaid checks or provide multiple checks for each scheduled payment under the agreement.9(2), and may initiate debt collection, civil court proceedings, or arbitration to collect on the unpaid checks. A violation of the bill may result in an administrative fine of not more than $5,000 for each violation and the cost of investigation.
Senate subcommittee
Named February 3, 2021. It hasn’t reported yet.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Crea§533D.9A
Modifica§533D.9
Cabildeo
1 a favor · 0 en contra · 1 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Tried before
89th General Assembly
Picked up later
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.
- HF 440 Relating to delayed deposit services by limiting the annual percentage rate for fees and r…88th General Assembly · In committee · nearly identicalCleared committee
Similar bills this General Assembly
- HF 2039 Relating to delayed deposit services by limiting the annual percentage rate for fees and r…91st General Assembly · In committeeNearly identical
Matched by wording or an identical title.