Bills › 89th General Assembly

HSB 555Died when the session ended · February 3, 2022

HSB 555

Topics:Courts & civil lawTechnology & privacyCryptocurrency

Same legislation: SF 2049, HF 2302

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 18, 2022
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 19, 2022
  3. Done: House committeeFebruary 3, 2022
  4. Done: Passes the HouseMarch 2, 202299–0
  5. Done: Senate committeeMarch 16, 2022
  6. Stopped: Passes the SenateDied when the General Assembly ended
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The 2022 session adjourned on May 24, 2022, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary This law updates the definitions of electronic records and signatures to include blockchain technology. It also protects businesses from certain lawsuits if they use a cybersecurity program that follows recognized industry standards to protect personal information. These programs must be designed to prevent identity theft and must match the size and complexity of the company using them.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to cybersecurity programs and blockchain technology. The bill changes the definitions of “electronic record” and “electronic signature” in the uniform electronic transactions Act to include blockchain technology. The bill creates affirmative defenses for entities using cybersecurity programs and provides definitions. The bill provides that a covered entity seeking an affirmative defense must use a cybersecurity program for the protection of personal information or both personal information and restricted information and the cybersecurity program must reasonably conform to an industry-recognized cybersecurity framework. A cybersecurity program must protect the security and confidentiality of the information, protect against any anticipated threats to the information, and protect against unauthorized access to and acquisition of the information that is likely to result in a material risk of identity theft. _____ and scope of the covered entity’s activities, sensitivity of the information, and the cost and availability of tools and resources to improve information security. A covered entity that satisfies the above requirements is entitled to an affirmative defense to a tort claim that alleges that the failure to implement reasonable information security controls resulted in a data breach concerning personal information or restricted information. The bill provides industry-recognized cybersecurity frameworks that the covered entity should follow and reasonably comply to in order to qualify for the affirmative defense. The bill does not provide a private right to action, including a class action.

Changed since by amendment H-8049; see Amendments.

Full bill text2

House subcommittee

Named January 19, 2022. On February 3, 2022 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 3-0.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§554E.1§554E.2§554E.3§554E.4

Amends§554D.103

How the Code works3

Lobbying

5 for · 0 against · 40 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Similar bills

  • SSB 1095 SSB 1095
    90th General Assembly · Renumbered as SF 495
    Nearly identical

Matched by wording or an identical title.