Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General

HF 842Murió al terminar la sesión · 25 de marzo de 2021

Relating to the assessment of fees when a public defender or designee requests copies of certain documents

Presentado por el comité Ways and Means (successor To Hf 57) de la Cámara

Temas:Courts & civil lawCrime & corrections

La misma legislación: SF 51, HF 57, HF 545, SF 560, SF 593

Escriba a sus legisladores sobre esto

También incluye SF 51 y HF 57 y HF 545 y SF 560 y SF 593.

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado12 de enero de 2021
  2. Hecho: Subcomité14 de enero de 2021
  3. Hecho: Comité de la Cámara15 de febrero de 2021
  4. Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara25 de marzo de 2021
  5. Hecho: Comité del Senado6 de abril de 2021
  6. Se detuvo: Lo aprueba el SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2022 terminó el 24 de mayo de 2022, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA Public defenders or their assistants can request copies of certain legal documents for a fee of no more than $10 per request. If the documents are already available online or through a cloud system, there is no charge at all. When multiple documents are requested at once, it counts as just one single request. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to the assessment of fees when a public defender or designee requests copies of certain documents. The bill provides that a written request for a discovery document by a public defender or public defender’s designee shall be provided at no more than $10 per document request unless otherwise ordered by the court. A request for multiple discovery documents made at the same time is considered to be a single request. Digital discovery documents shall be provided in a format that is generally accessible to the public. However, no fee will be charged if the discovery document requested is available on a cloud-based system or if the discovery document is available for downloading by an individual from an existing system such as a state, county, or city internet site.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)2

Senate subcommittee

Named January 19, 2022. On April 6, 2022 it recommended passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Nota fiscal

Savings: up to $84,000 Compare con otros proyectos

Resumen con IA This bill limits the fee a public defender pays for document requests to no more than $10 per request. It is estimated to save $84,000 per year for the Indigent Defense Fund beginning in fiscal year 2022. The overall impact on local agencies like law enforcement and county attorneys cannot be determined and will vary on a case-by-case basis. (en inglés)3

Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)

Description

Senate File 593 relates to the assessment of fees when a public defender or designee requests copies of certain documents. The Bill provides that a written request for a discovery document by a public defender or public defender’s designee shall be provided at no more than $10 per document request unless otherwise ordered by the court. A request for multiple discovery documents made at the same time is considered to be a single request. Digital Discovery documents are to be provided in a format that is generally accessible to the public. However, no fee will be charged if the discovery document requested is available on a cloud-based system or if the discovery document is available for downloading by an individual from an existing system such as a State, county, or city Internet site.

Background

Currently, State agencies and local governments may charge a fee to the State Public Defender for discovery documents. The fees vary by the local or State agency providing the document and the document being provided. The fees are paid from the Indigent Defense Fund.

Assumptions

  • The Bill will not change existing discovery practices and procedures other than to impose an upper limit on the amount that can be charged for the production of documents to an indigent defendant or person during a criminal case or other proceeding in which the indigent person is entitled to representation at State expense.
  • Entities will charge the maximum amount allowed by the Bill, $10 per request.
  • The Bill does not require clerks’ offices to provide paper copies of electronic documents that are already available electronically.
  • The average annual number of claims to the Indigent Defense Fund for discovery requests over the last four years was 2,964 claims. The average annual total paid for these claims was $114,000. It is assumed that the number of claims to the Indigent Defense Fund for discovery requests will remain consistent in future fiscal years.

Fiscal Impact

Senate File 593 is estimated to result in a cost savings of $84,000 per year to the Indigent Defense Fund beginning in FY 2022. Table 1 provides the annual estimated costs to the Indigent Defense Fund under this Bill and current law.

Table 1 — Indigent Defense Fund — Annual Discovery Request Fee Costs Additionally, SF 593 is estimated to have an impact on several local agencies applicable under the Bill, including but not limited to local law enforcement and county attorneys. Due to theAnnual Cases Current Law SF 593 SF 593

Cost Savings

2,964 114,000$ 30,000$ 84,000$ varying nature of fees charged by local agencies for discovery materials, the overall local impact of the $10 fee cap cannot be determined and will vary on a case-by-case basis.

Sources

  • Office of the State Public Defender
  • Judicial Branch
  • LSA analysis

El cálculo no cambió

  1. $84,000 22 de febrero de 2021
  2. $84,000 22 de marzo de 2021
  3. $84,000 21 de abril de 2021
4

Cómo leer una nota fiscal5

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§815.16

Cómo funciona el Código6

Cabildeo

2 a favor · 3 en contra · 16 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None became law, though one got through a chamber.

  • HF 753 Relating to the assessment of fees when a public defender or designee requests copies of c…
    88th General Assembly · Passed House · same title
    Passed a chamber
  • HF 4 Relating to the assessment of fees when a public defender or designee requests copies of c…
    88th General Assembly · Withdrawn · same title
    Didn’t advance
  • HF 529 Relating to the assessment of fees when a public defender or designee requests copies of c…
    88th General Assembly · Withdrawn · same title
    Didn’t advance
  • SF 52 Relating to the assessment of fees when a public defender or designee requests copies of c…
    88th General Assembly · In committee · same title
    Cleared committee

Matched by wording or an identical title.