Relating to the assessment of fees when a person requests examination and copying of public records

Sponsored by the House State Government Committee

Topics:State government

Same legislation: SF 218, HF 637, SF 480, SF 2322

Write your legislators about itWhat changed before it passed

Official bill page Lobbyist declarations One-pager to print

Where it is now

Done: IntroducedFebruary 2, 2021
Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 23, 2021
Done: House committeeFebruary 25, 2021
Done: Passes the HouseMarch 24, 202293–0
Skipped: Senate committeeSkipped
Done: Passes the SenateFebruary 23, 202248–0
Done: To the GovernorMay 2, 2022
Done: Signed into lawMay 2, 2022

SF 2322 became law → The same legislation passed as SF 2322, so this version was set aside. Go to SF 2322 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary People asking for public records should be charged little or no money, and any extra costs must be reasonable and explained to them. If a request costs more than $500, the government must prove the price is fair. Officials can charge up to $15 per hour to help people copy records, and they can only use legal services to hide private information.¹

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to fees associated with public records requests. The bill provides that the lawful custodian of a public record shall make every effort to provide a public record requested at little or no cost. In the event additional expenses are necessary, such expenses shall be reasonable and communicated to the requester upon receipt of the request. Any estimated expense in excess of $500 creates a rebuttable presumption that such expenses are not reasonable.5 and a prevailing party in such an action may be awarded reasonable attorney fees. The bill provides that the fees charged for supervising the examination and copying of public records by the lawful custodian shall not exceed $15 per hour. Costs for legal services shall only be utilized for the redaction or review of legally protected confidential information.

Full bill text · What changed before it passed²

Fiscal note

AI summary This bill requires public record custodians to provide records for only the cost of copying if the request takes less than 30 minutes and limits legal fees to the redaction of confidential information. It is not possible to estimate the overall fiscal impact on state agencies or local governments at this time. The impact may vary depending on the size of the entity and the volume of future record requests.³

Read the fiscal note

Description

Senate File 2322 relates to the assessment of fees associated with public record requests under Iowa Code chapter 22. The Bill provides that the lawful custodian of public records must make every reasonable effort to provide a requested public record at no cost other than copying costs for a record that takes less than 30 minutes to produce. If expenses are necessary, such expenses must be reasonable. A requester may contest the reasonableness of the custodian’s expenses as provided for in Iowa Code chapter 22. The Bill also provides that costs for legal services should only be utilized for the redaction or review of legally protected confidential information.

Background

Under Iowa Code chapter 22, all expenses for the examination and copying of public records are paid by the person desiring to examine or copy the record. Government bodies may include charges directly attributable to supervising the examination of public records, providing copies of public records, and cannot include charges for ordinary expenses or costs such as employment benefits, depreciation, maintenance, electricity, or insurance associated with the administration of the office.

Assumptions

There may be an increase in the quantity of public record requests and the scope of public record requests due to lower fees assessed to obtain records.
There may be unrecovered costs of public record requests for governmental entities.
Costs may vary for governmental entities based on size and average volume of existing public records requests, as well as the variability of requests throughout a fiscal year.
Costs may vary for governmental entities based on the extent to which fees are already absorbed by the entity and the fee rate charged to the requester.
Not all State agencies and local government entities receiving public record requests may incur increased costs as a result of this Bill.

Fiscal Impact

The estimated fiscal impact of SF 2322 may vary across State agencies. In a sample survey of agencies of various sizes that responded to a request for information to the Legislative Services Agency, the majority stated that there would be no fiscal impact or that any fiscal impact is likely to be minimal. However, due to the variability across agencies and the inability to predict the volume of future open record requests, it is not possible to estimate the overall fiscal impact to State agencies at this time. In the instance of increased public record requests, it is possible that agencies may request additional full-time equivalent (FTE) positions. The fiscal impact of SF 2322 on local governments also cannot be estimated at this time. Additional costs that may be absorbed by a local government are expected to vary based on the size of the entity, the current hourly rate charged for services, and the volume and scope of the requests received in a given year. Not all local government entities may experience a fiscal impact as a result of this Bill.