Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General
Relating to pharmacy benefits managers, pharmacies, and prescription drug benefits, and including applicability provisions
Presentado por el comité Commerce de la Cámara
Temas:Business & economyHealth carePrescription drug prices
La misma legislación: HSB 228
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado18 de febrero de 2021
- Hecho: Subcomité18 de febrero de 2021
- Hecho: Comité de la Cámara1 de marzo de 2021
- Se detuvo: Lo aprueba la CámaraMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Comité del Senado
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2022 terminó el 24 de mayo de 2022, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA Pharmacy benefits managers must allow Iowa pharmacies to join their networks if the pharmacies agree to the same rules. This law stops these managers from charging pharmacies extra fees and prevents them from paying pharmacies less than they pay their own affiliates for the same drugs. It also protects patients by ensuring they can see lower-cost drug options and that their payments count toward their insurance deductibles. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to pharmacy benefits managers, pharmacies, and prescription drug benefits. The bill requires a pharmacy benefits manager (PBM) to allow a pharmacy located in the state to participate in a pharmacy network (network) provided that the pharmacy accepts the same terms and conditions as the PBM imposes on the pharmacies in the network. “Pharmacy benefits manager” is defined in the bill as a person who, pursuant to a contract or other relationship with a health carrier, either directly or through an intermediary, manages a prescription drug benefit provided by the health carrier. “Pharmacy network”, “pharmacy”, “prescription drug benefit”, and “health carrier” are also defined in the bill. The bill prohibits a PBM from assessing, charging, or collecting any form of remuneration that passes from a pharmacy in the network to the PBM including but not limited to claim processing fees, performance-based fees, network participation fees, or accreditation fees. The bill prohibits a covered person from being required to make a cost-sharing payment at the point-of-sale for a prescription drug (drug) in an amount that exceeds the maximum allowable cost (MAC) for that drug. The bill defines the “maximum allowable cost” as the maximum amount that a pharmacy will be reimbursed by a PBM or a health carrier for a generic drug, brand-name drug, biologic product, or other drug and that may include the average or national average acquisition cost; the average manufacturer price; the average wholesale price; the brand or generic effective rate; discount indexing; federal upper limits; wholesale acquisition cost; or any other term used by a PBM or health carrier to establish reimbursement rates for a pharmacy. “Covered person” is defined in the bill. A PBM cannot prohibit a pharmacy from disclosing the availability of a lower-cost drug option to a covered person, or from selling a lower-cost drug option to a covered person. The bill requires that any amount paid by a covered person for a drug in the circumstances detailed in the bill must be applied to any deductible imposed by the covered person’s health benefit plan in accordance with the plan’s coverage documents. Under the bill, a covered person cannot be prohibited from filling a drug order at any pharmacy located in the state if the pharmacy accepts the same terms and conditions as the PBM imposes on at least one of the pharmacy networks that the PBM has established in the state. A PBM cannot impose different cost-sharing or additional fees on a covered person based on the pharmacy at which a covered person fills their prescription. The bill allows a pharmacy to decline to dispense a drug to a covered person if, as a result of the maximum allowable cost list (MACL) to which the pharmacy is subject, the pharmacy will be reimbursed less than the pharmacy’s acquisition cost. “Pharmacy acquisition cost” is defined in the bill. “Maximum allowable cost list” is defined in the bill as a list of prescription drugs that includes the MAC for each drug and that is used, directly or indirectly, by a PBM. “Pharmacy acquisition cost” is also defined in the bill. The bill requires that prior to placement of a particular drug on a MACL, a PBM must ensure that the drug is listed as therapeutically and pharmaceutically equivalent in the most recent edition of the “Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations”, published by the United States food and drug administration; the drug cannot be obsolete or temporarily unavailable; and the drug must be available for purchase by all pharmacies in the state from a national or regional wholesale distributor (distributor) that is licensed in the state. “Wholesale distributor” is defined in the bill. The bill requires a PBM to provide each pharmacy in a network reasonable access to the MACL to which the pharmacy is subject, and to update each MACL within seven calendar days from the date of an increase of percent or more in the pharmacy acquisition cost of a drug by one or more distributors doing business in the state. The PBM must also update a MACL within seven calendar days from the date of a change in the methodology, or a change in a value of a variable applied in the methodology, on which the MACL is based. The PBM is also required to provide a process for each pharmacy in a network to receive prompt notice of all changes to a MACL. The bill prohibits a PBM from reimbursing a pharmacy located in the state in an amount less than the amount that the PBM reimburses a PBM affiliate for dispensing the same drug as the pharmacy. “Pharmacy benefits manager affiliate” is defined in the bill. The bill provides that after the date of receipt of a clean claim submitted by a pharmacy, a PBM cannot retroactively reduce payment on the claim, either directly or indirectly, except if the claim is found not to be a clean claim during the course of a routine audit. “Clean claim” is defined in the bill. The bill requires a PBM to provide a process for pharmacies to appeal a MAC, or a reimbursement made under a MACL. The requirements for the appeal process are detailed in the bill. The commissioner of insurance (commissioner) is required to take any enforcement action under the commissioner’s authority to enforce compliance with the bill.7, and may suspend or revoke a PBM’s certificate of registration as a third-party administrator (administrator) upon a finding that the PBM violated any requirements of the bill, or any applicable requirements pertaining to administrators under Code chapter 510. A PBM is subject to the commissioner’s authority to conduct an examination pursuant to Code chapter 507 and a proceeding pursuant to Code chapter 507B. A PBM is also subject to the commissioner’s authority to conduct an examination, audit, or inspection pursuant to Code chapter 510. If the commissioner conducts an examination, a proceeding, an audit, or an inspection, all information received from the PBM, and all documents related to the examination, proceeding, audit, or inspection are confidential records pursuant to Code chapter 22.4. The bill requires the commissioner to adopt rules to administer the bill. If a provision of the bill or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the bill that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.9.10 (enforcement). The bill applies to PBMs that manage a health carrier’s prescription drug benefit in the state on or after the effective date of the bill.
House subcommittee
Named February 18, 2021 (as HSB 228). Meeting: Monday, March 1 · 12:00 PM · House Lounge.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Nota fiscal
Cost: up to $76,000 Compare con otros proyectos
Resumen con IA This bill changes how pharmacy benefits managers interact with pharmacies and regulates prescription drug costs and reimbursements. The total increased cost to the State General Fund and other state funds used for State of Iowa Plan health insurance is estimated to be $10.2 million annually. Additionally, the Commerce Revolving Fund is estimated to cost approximately $76,000 annually to add one full-time position for enforcement. (en inglés)3
Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)
Description
House File 729 relates to pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs), pharmacies, and prescription drug benefits and applies to PBMs that manage a health carrier’s prescription drug benefit in the State. The Bill does the following:
- Requires pharmacy benefits managers to allow pharmacies located in the State to participate in a pharmacy network, provided that the pharmacy accepts the same terms and conditions as those the PBM imposes on the pharmacies in the network.
- Prohibits a PBM from assessing, charging, or collecting any form of renumeration that passes from a pharmacy in the network to the PBM, including but not limited to claim processing fees, performance-based fees, network participation fees, or accreditation fees.
- Prohibits a covered person from being required to make a cost-sharing payment at the point-of-sale for a prescription drug in an amount that exceeds the maximum allowable cost for that drug.
- Allows for covered persons to fill drug orders at any pharmacy located in the State if the pharmacy accepts the same terms and conditions as the PBM on at least one of the pharmacy networks that the PBM has established in the State.
- Prohibits PBMs from imposing different cost-sharing or additional fees on a covered person based on the pharmacy at which a covered person fills their prescription.
- Allows a pharmacy to decline to dispense a drug to a covered person if, as a result of the maximum allowable cost list (MACL) to which the pharmacy is subject, the pharmacy will be reimbursed less than the pharmacy’s acquisition cost.
- Requires that prior to placement of a particular drug on an MACL, a PBM must ensure that the drug is listed as therapeutically and pharmaceutically equivalent in the most recent edition of the Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, as published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
- Requires a PBM to provide each pharmacy in a network reasonable access to the MACL to which the pharmacy is subject, and to update each MACL within seven calendar days from the date of an increase of 10.0% or more in the pharmacy acquisition cost of a drug by one or more distributors doing business in the State. The PBM must also update an MACL within seven calendar days from the date of a change in the methodology, or a change in a value of a variable applied in the methodology on which the MACL is based. The PBM is also required to provide a prompt process for notifying each pharmacy in a network of all changes to an MACL.
- Prohibits a PBM for reimbursing a pharmacy located in the State for an amount less than the amount that the PBM reimburses a PBM affiliate for dispensing the same drug as the pharmacy.
- Provides that after the date of receipt of a “clean claim” submitted by the pharmacy, a PBM cannot retroactively reduce payment on the claim. However, payment can be reduced if the claim is found not to be a “clean claim” during the course of a routine audit.
- Requires a PBM to provide a process for pharmacies to appeal a maximum allowable cost (MAC) or a reimbursement made under an MACL.
- Requires the Insurance Commissioner to take any enforcement action under the Commissioner’s authority to enforce compliance.
- Requires the Insurance Commissioner to adopt rules to administer the Bill.
Background
Currently, as a cost-saving measure, Wellmark supplies specialty drugs that are obtained via mail order through restricted outlets.
Assumptions
- The MAC provisions would increase the amount reimbursed per unit for filling prescriptions. This language is estimated to increase costs for the State of Iowa Plan group by 6.6%.
- The PBM affiliate provisions in the Bill are estimated to increase costs for the State of Iowa Plan group by 5.3%.
- The supply of specialty drugs through restricted outlets is not allowed under the Bill. The discontinuance of this cost-saving measure would raise the costs of specialty drugs by approximately 6.0%. For the State of Iowa Plan group, specialty drugs account for 30.0% of drug expenses. Drug-related claims for the State of Iowa Plan group, specifically, are estimated to increase by 1.8%.
- Additional enforcement actions as carried out by the Insurance Division will require the Division to add 1.0 full-time equivalent (FTE) position for an Insurance Complaint Analyst.
Fiscal Impact
The total increased cost to the State General Fund and other State funds that are used to pay for the provision of health insurance to State of Iowa employees is estimated to be $10.2 million annually. This is due in part to the increase in drug expenses after cost-saving measures are eliminated, and also due to the increased reimbursement amount per unit for filling prescriptions.
The total cost to the Commerce Revolving Fund is approximately $76,000 annually for an Insurance Complaint Analyst FTE position, for the purpose of enforcing compliance with the provisions in the Bill.
Source
- Wellmark
- Pharmacy Benefits Manager, Reimbursement · 15 de marzo de 2021 · $76,000
- Pharmacy Benefits Manager, Reimbursement · 10 de marzo de 2021
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Crea§510B.11§510B.12§510B.8A§510B.8B§510B.8C§510B.8D
Modifica§505.26§507B.4§510B.1§510B.10§510B.2§510B.4§510B.5§510B.6§510B.7§510B.8§510B.9
Deroga§510B.3
Cabildeo
7 a favor · 7 en contra · 22 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Study bill
89th General Assembly
Similar bills
- HF 2384 Relating to pharmacy benefits managers, pharmacies, and prescription drug benefits, and in…89th General Assembly · Signed by GovernorSimilar
Matched by wording or an identical title.