Bills › 89th General Assembly
Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit plans, and utilization review organizations, and including applicability provisions
Topics:Health careInsurance
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 4, 2021
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 10, 2021
- Done: House committeeFebruary 18, 2021
- Skipped: Passes the HouseContinued as HF 656
- Next: Senate committee
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Became HF 656 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to HF 656 What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Health insurance companies and plans cannot suddenly stop covering a specific prescription drug or make it more expensive if a person is medically stable on that medicine. This rule applies to people who have already been using the drug for at least six months and have had it approved by their insurance. If an insurance company denies a request to keep covering a drug, they must follow a fast process to review that decision.1
Read the official explanation
This bill relates to the continuity of care for a covered person and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit plans, and utilization review organizations. The bill defines “nonmedical switching” as a health benefit plan’s restrictive changes to the health benefit plan’s formulary after the current plan year has begun or during the open enrollment period for the upcoming plan year, causing a covered person who is medically stable on the covered person’s current prescribed drug as determined by the prescribing health care professional, to switch to a less costly alternate prescription drug. The bill provides that during a covered person’s eligibility under a health benefit plan, inclusive of any open enrollment period, a health plan carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization shall not limit or exclude coverage of a prescription drug for the covered person if the covered person is medically stable on the drug as determined by the prescribing health care professional, the drug was previously approved by the health carrier for coverage for the person, and the covered person’s prescribing health care professional has prescribed the drug for the person’s medical condition within the previous six months. The bill includes, as prohibited limitations or exclusions, reducing the maximum coverage of prescription drug benefits, increasing cost sharing for a covered drug, moving a drug to a more restrictive tier, and removing a drug from a formulary. A prescription drug may, however, be removed from a formulary if the United States food and drug administration issues a statement regarding the clinical safety of the drug, or the manufacturer of the drug notifies the United States food and drug administration of a manufacturing discontinuance or potential discontinuance of the drug as required by section 506c of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The bill provides that a drug product with the same generic name and demonstrated bioavailability, or an interchangeable biological product, is considered equivalent to the prescription drug prescribed by the covered person’s health care professional. The bill requires a covered person and prescribing health care professional to have access to a process to request a coverage exemption determination. The bill defines “coverage exemption determination” as a determination made by a health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization whether to cover a prescription drug that is otherwise excluded from coverage. A coverage exemption determination request must be approved or denied by the health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization within five calendar days, or within hours if exigent circumstances exist. If a determination is not received within the applicable time period the coverage exemption is deemed granted. The bill requires a coverage exemption to be expeditiously granted for a health benefit plan that is discontinued for the next plan year if a covered person enrolls in a comparable plan offered by the same health carrier, and in comparison to the discontinued health benefit plan, the new health benefit plan limits or reduces the maximum coverage for a prescription drug, increases cost sharing for the prescription drug, moves the prescription drug to a more restrictive tier, or excludes the prescription drug from the formulary. If a coverage exemption is granted, the bill requires an authorization of coverage that is no more restrictive than that offered in the discontinued health benefit plan, or than that offered prior to implementation of restrictive changes to the health benefit plan’s formulary after the current plan year began. If a determination is made to deny a request for a coverage exemption, the reason for denial and the procedure to appeal the denial must be provided to the requestor. Any determination to deny a coverage exemption may be appealed to the health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization. A determination to uphold or reverse denial of a coverage exemption must be made within five calendar days of receipt of an appeal, or within hours if exigent circumstances exist. If a determination is not made within the applicable time period, the denial is deemed reversed and the coverage exemption is deemed approved. If a determination to deny a coverage exemption is upheld on appeal, the reason for upholding the denial and the procedure to request external review of the denial pursuant to Code chapter 514J must be provided to the individual who filed the appeal. Any denial of a request for a coverage exemption that is upheld on appeal is considered a final adverse determination for purposes of Code chapter 514J and is eligible for a request for external review by a covered person or the covered person’s authorized representative pursuant to Code chapter 514J. The bill shall not be construed to prevent a health care professional from prescribing another drug covered by the health carrier that the health care professional deems medically necessary for the covered person. The bill shall not be construed to prevent a health carrier from adding a drug to its formulary, or from removing a drug from its formulary if the drug manufacturer removes the drug for sale in the United States. The bill allows the commissioner to take any necessary enforcement action under the commissioner’s authority to enforce compliance with the bill. The bill is applicable to health benefit plans that are delivered, issued for delivery, continued, or renewed in this state on or after January 1, 2022.
House subcommittee
Named February 10, 2021. On February 11, 2021 it recommended amendment and passage. Vote Total: 3-0.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Fiscal note
AI summary This bill prohibits health plans from switching a person's prescribed drug to a less costly alternative for nonmedical reasons and establishes a process for requesting coverage exemptions. The bill is expected to increase pharmacy costs for the State of Iowa Insurance Plan, with an estimated increase ranging from a minimum of $970,000 to a maximum of $5.8 million. While the bill's provisions for nonmedical switching in approved cases are estimated to reduce expenses for the state, the total fiscal impact cannot be determined.3
Read the fiscal note
Description
House File 2199 relates to the continuity of care for a person covered by a health benefit plan and does the following:
- Prohibits nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit plans, and utilization review organizations.
- Allows a prescription drug to be removed from a formulary if the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issues a statement regarding the clinical safety of the drug or the manufacturer notifies the FDA of a manufacturing discontinuance or potential discontinuance of the drug as required by Section 506c of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
- Provides that a drug product with the same generic name and demonstrated bioavailability, or an interchangeable biological product, is considered equivalent to the prescription drug prescribed by the covered person’s health care professional.
- Requires a covered person and prescribing health care professional to have access to a process to request a coverage exemption determination.
- Defines “coverage exemption determination” as a determination made by a health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization whether to cover a prescription drug that is otherwise excluded from coverage.
- Requires a coverage exemption determination request to be approved or denied by the health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization within five calendar days or within 72 hours under extenuating circumstances.
- Requires a coverage exemption to be expeditiously granted for a health benefit plan that is discontinued for the next plan year if a covered person enrolls in a comparable plan offered by the same health carrier and, in comparison to the discontinued health benefit plan, the new health benefit plan limits or reduces the maximum coverage for a prescription drug; increases cost-sharing for the prescription drug; moves the prescription drug to a more restrictive tier; or excludes the prescription drug from the formulary.
- If a coverage exemption is granted, requires an authorization of coverage that is no more restrictive than that offered in a discontinued health benefit plan or than that offered prior to implementation of restrictive changes to the health benefit plan’s formulary after the current plan year began.
- Requires a reason for denial and a procedure to appeal the denial to be provided to the requestor in the event that a determination is made to deny a request for a coverage exemption.
- Allows the Insurance Commissioner to take any necessary enforcement action under the Commissioner’s authority to enforce compliance with this Bill.
The Bill applies to health benefit plans that are delivered, issued for delivery, continued, or renewed in the State of Iowa on or after January 1, 2023.
Background
Nonmedical switching is the practice of switching a covered individual’s prescribed drug to a less costly alternative while the individual has been determined to be medically stable while on the drug, without medical reasons given by the individual’s prescribing health care professional. House File 2199 is estimated to impact approximately 25.8% of the population (822,000). This includes individual coverage, fully insured small and large employer groups, self-insured public employees, and the State of Iowa Plan.
Of the individuals not covered by the mandate, approximately 45.2% are covered by government-sponsored health insurance, 23.0% are covered by employer coverage that is governed by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), and the remaining 6.0% are uninsured.
Source: Iowa Insurance Division.
Assumptions
The Bill is expected to increase pharmacy costs for the State of Iowa Insurance Plan by 1.0% to 6.0%.
Fiscal Impact
House File 2199 is estimated to increase the annual cost to the State of Iowa Insurance Plan and will increase expenses from State funds used to pay State employees’ health insurance costs. The estimated increase in pharmacy costs for the State of Iowa Plan range from a minimum impact of $970,000, which is associated with a 1.0% increase in pharmacy costs, to a maximum of $5.8 million, which is associated with a 6.0% increase in pharmacy costs. The Bill’s provisions for nonmedical switching in approved cases is estimated to reduce expenses for the State, which will offset increases in expenses due to changes related to pharmacy costs. However, the fiscal impact cannot be determined.
Sources
- Iowa Insurance Division
- Wellmark
- Prescription Drug Formularies, Preserving Patient Stability · February 16, 2022
- Prescription Drug Formularies, Preserving Patient Stability · February 9, 2022
- Prescription Drug Formularies, Preserving Patient Stability · March 3, 2021
Family tree
Tried before
89th General Assembly
Picked up later
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.
- HF 2089 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…88th General Assembly · Approved by committee · same titleCleared committee
- SF 292 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…88th General Assembly · Renumbered as SF 489 · same titleCleared committee
- HF 2423 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…88th General Assembly · Approved by committee · nearly identicalCleared committee
- HF 204 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…88th General Assembly · In committee · nearly identicalCleared committee
Similar bills this General Assembly
- SF 178 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…89th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passageNearly identical
- SF 2016 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…89th General Assembly · In committeeNearly identical
- HF 96 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…90th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 626Very similar
Matched by wording or an identical title.