Bills › 89th General Assembly

HF 298Died when the session ended · February 23, 2021

Relating to the authority of a county to adopt set-back requirements

Topics:Cities & counties

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 28, 2021
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 9, 2021
  3. Stopped: House committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
  4. Next: Passes the House
  5. Next: Senate committee
  6. Next: Passes the Senate
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The 2022 session adjourned on May 24, 2022, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary County leaders would gain the power to set rules about how far buildings must be from public roads. These new rules would apply to all types of property, including farms and agricultural buildings. Currently, these rules are not allowed to affect farmhouses or barns used for farming.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to the authority of a county to adopt set-back requirements. Under current law, a county board of supervisors may by ordinance regulate certain physical characteristics of property located in the county but outside the corporate limits of a city. Such an ordinance does not apply to land, farm houses, farm barns, farm outbuildings, or other buildings or structures that are primarily adapted, by reason of nature and area, for use for agricultural purposes while so used. The bill authorizes a county board of supervisors to adopt an ordinance that establishes a building or structure set-back requirement of up to feet from a public right-of-way regardless of the use of any affected property.

Full bill text2

House subcommittee

Named February 9, 2021. On February 23, 2021 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 2-1.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§335.2§335.3

How the Code works3

Lobbying

3 for · 0 against · 3 undecided · Who →