Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General
Concerning the implantation or insertion of microchips or other devices in employees by employers
Presentado por el comité Judiciary de la Cámara
Temas:Jobs & workersTechnology & privacy
La misma legislación: HSB 10
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado12 de enero de 2021
- Hecho: Subcomité12 de enero de 2021
- Hecho: Comité de la Cámara27 de enero de 2021
- Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara8 de febrero de 2021
- Hecho: Comité del Senado31 de marzo de 2021
- Se detuvo: Lo aprueba el SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2022 terminó el 24 de mayo de 2022, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA Employers cannot force their workers to have a microchip or any other device implanted in their bodies. Companies are also banned from offering special perks or rewards to employees who choose to get an implant unless those same perks are given to everyone. Workers can still choose to get an implant on their own, as long as their employer isn't requiring it or offering extra benefits for doing so. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill prohibits an employer from requiring that an employee have a microchip or other device implanted or inserted in the employee’s body. The bill also prohibits an employer from providing any incentive or privilege to an employee for agreeing to have a microchip or other device implanted or inserted in the employee’s body that is not equally available to employees who do not so agree. The bill provides that an employee may voluntarily agree to have a microchip or other device implanted or inserted in the employee’s body if not required or offered an incentive or privilege to do so by an employer.
Senate subcommittee
Named February 10, 2021. On March 23, 2021 it recommended amendment and passage.
- Sen. Dennis Guth REmail
- Sen. William A. Dotzler Jr. DEmail
- Sen. J. Taylor
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Cabildeo
10 a favor · 1 en contra · 2 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Tried before
Study bill
89th General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None became law, though one got through a chamber.
- HF 2361 Concerning the implantation or insertion of microchips or other devices in employees by em…88th General Assembly · Passed House · same titlePassed a chamber
Matched by wording or an identical title.