Bills › 89th General Assembly
Concerning the implantation or insertion of microchips or other devices in employees by employers
Sponsored by the House Judiciary Committee
Topics:Jobs & workersTechnology & privacy
Same legislation: HSB 10
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedJanuary 12, 2021
- Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 12, 2021
- Done: House committeeJanuary 27, 2021
- Done: Passes the HouseFebruary 8, 2021
- Done: Senate committeeMarch 31, 2021
- Stopped: Passes the SenateDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2022 session adjourned on May 24, 2022, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Employers cannot force their workers to have a microchip or any other device implanted in their bodies. Companies are also banned from offering special perks or rewards to employees who choose to get an implant unless those same perks are given to everyone. Workers can still choose to get an implant on their own, as long as their employer isn't requiring it or offering extra benefits for doing so.1
Read the official explanation
This bill prohibits an employer from requiring that an employee have a microchip or other device implanted or inserted in the employee’s body. The bill also prohibits an employer from providing any incentive or privilege to an employee for agreeing to have a microchip or other device implanted or inserted in the employee’s body that is not equally available to employees who do not so agree. The bill provides that an employee may voluntarily agree to have a microchip or other device implanted or inserted in the employee’s body if not required or offered an incentive or privilege to do so by an employer.
Senate subcommittee
Named February 10, 2021. On March 23, 2021 it recommended amendment and passage.
- Sen. Dennis Guth REmail
- Sen. William A. Dotzler Jr. DEmail
- Sen. J. Taylor
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Iowa Code it changes
Lobbying
10 for · 1 against · 2 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Tried before
Study bill
89th General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None became law, though one got through a chamber.
- HF 2361 Concerning the implantation or insertion of microchips or other devices in employees by em…88th General Assembly · Passed House · same titlePassed a chamber
Matched by wording or an identical title.