Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General
Relating to state and local finances and the duties and procedures of the department of revenue by providing for electronic filing, communications, and records, modifying transfer tax remittances, the assessment of property, the collection of debt, the refunds of certain fuel taxes, and the taxation of pass-through entities, reducing inheritance taxes for unknown heirs, establishing salaries, providing for a fee, making appropriations, and providing penalties, and including effective date, applicability, and retroactive applicability provisions
Presentado por el comité Ways and Means (companion To Sf 2371 By Committee on Ways and Means) de la Cámara
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado16 de febrero de 2022
- Hecho: Subcomité16 de febrero de 2022
- Hecho: Comité de la Cámara8 de marzo de 2022
- Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara17 de marzo de 202260–34
- Hecho: Comité del Senado17 de marzo de 2022
- Hecho: Lo aprueba el Senado22 de marzo de 202231–18
- Hecho: A gobernador(a)2 de mayo de 2022
- Hecho: Firmado como ley2 de mayo de 2022
Firmado como ley ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA This bill changes how the Department of Revenue handles taxes, records, and communications. It requires many businesses and banks to file their tax returns electronically and allows the department to send certain notices online instead of by mail. Additionally, the bill updates how property is taxed and how the state collects unpaid debts. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to state and local finances and the duties and procedures of the department of revenue by providing for electronic filing, communications, and records, modifying transfer tax remittances, the assessment of property, the collection of debt, and the taxation of pass-through entities, reducing inheritance taxes for unknown heirs, and establishing salaries. DIVISION I —— RECORD RETENTION. Currently, the director of the department of revenue (DOR) may destroy useless records of any taxpayer filed with or kept by the department. The bill specifies that the director of revenue (director) shall destroy useless records by the end of the calendar year following the year in which the records are determined to be useless. The bill permits a taxpayer or the DOR to request the director retain a useless record under certain circumstances. The bill also permits DOR to retain some records if personally identifiable information has been removed, or the records are related to a rule, statement of law or policy, or a final order, decision, or opinion. The bill allows DOR to make electronic copies of records or use other methods to make such copies. The division takes effect January 1, 2025. DIVISION II —— ELECTRONIC FILING —— FIDUCIARIES —— BUSINESS ENTITIES. The bill requires a fiduciary to file an electronic return under any of the following certain circumstances: the individual, estate, or trust has gross receipts of $250,000 or more; the fiduciary is required to provide or more schedules K-1 to the beneficiaries; or the fiduciary reports $25,000 or more of Iowa tax credits. The bill requires a partnership to file an electronic return under any of the following circumstances: the partnership has gross receipts of $250,000 or more; the partnership is required to provide or more schedules K-1 to the partners; or the partnership reports $25,000 or more of Iowa tax credits.36, the bill requires the pass-through entity to file the composite return of the pass-through entity in an electronic format for the same taxable year. A composite return generally is a return filed by a pass-through entity that reports the state income of all nonresident owners. The bill requires a corporation to file an electronic return if the corporation has gross receipts of $250,000 or more, or the corporation reports $25,000 or more of Iowa tax credits, or in the case of an S corporation, the corporation is required to issue or more schedules K-1 to the shareholders. The bill requires an affiliated group of corporations to file an electronic return regardless of the amount of gross receipts of the affiliated group or Iowa tax credits claimed. The bill requires a financial institution (bank) to file an electronic return under any of the following circumstances: the financial institution has gross receipts of $250,000 or more; the financial institution reports $25,000 or more of Iowa tax credits, or in the case of an S corporation, the financial institution is required to issue or more schedules K-1 to the shareholders. The division applies to tax years ending on or after December 31, 2022, for a partnership, pass-through entity, corporation, and financial institution, and applies to tax years ending on or after December 31, 2023, for a fiduciary, or for tax years ending on or after December of the calendar year in which the department implements a system for receiving the electronic returns required by the division. DIVISION III —— ELECTRONIC FILING —— CREDIT UNIONS. The bill requires a credit union to file a return in an electronic format specified by DOR. The division applies to tax years ending on or after December 31, 2024, or for tax years ending on or after December of the calendar year in which the department implements a system for receiving the electronic returns required by the division. DIVISION IV —— AUTHORITY TO CHARGE FEES. The bill specifies DOR may charge a fee for a copy of a return. The fee may be established by rule. The bill also specifies that this division shall not be construed to prohibit DOR from charging a fee for a copy of a return prior to the enactment of the division pursuant to another authority of DOR. DIVISION V —— AUTHORITY TO ACT ON BEHALF OF TAXPAYER. The bill strikes and replaces provisions relating to the authority to act on behalf of a business entity, and specifies that such a person must be designated to act on behalf of the business entity in tax matters. The bill specifies DOR may authorize a trustee to have authority to act on behalf of a taxpayer, if the trustee complies with certain conditions requested by DOR including but not limited to providing a certification of trust or providing a copy of the trust agreement. The bill specifies DOR may authorize a person named as an agent in a general or durable power of attorney document that is currently in force.256, of a very small estate to act on behalf of the taxpayer. The bill requires a person acting on behalf of a taxpayer to certify that the person possesses actual authority to act on behalf of the entity in tax matters. The bill allows DOR to require any documents or other evidence to demonstrate an individual has authority to act on behalf of the taxpayer before DOR. DIVISION VI —— ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION. Under the bill, DOR may permit a person to elect to receive a notice, correspondence, or other communication electronically.329 (taxation of credit unions). The bill allows DOR to send any notice, correspondence, or other communication by mail to a person who has elected to receive an electronic communication. DIVISION VII —— INCOME STATEMENTS TO BE PROVIDED TO THE DEPARTMENT.16(10)(a) relating to the penalties for willful violations of the following: failure to furnish an employee with an income statement; furnishing a false or fraudulent income statement to an employee; failure to file an income statement with DOR; filing a false or fraudulent income statement with DOR; failure to file an annual reporting of taxes withheld with DOR; and filing a false or fraudulent annual reporting of taxes withheld with DOR. Under the bill and in current law, each violation is punishable by a $500 civil penalty.27 in addition to the tax or additional tax due.16 (withholding income tax) in the case of illness, disability, absence, or if good cause is shown. DIVISION VIII —— REMITTANCES OF TRANSFER TAX. Currently, the county recorder remits the real estate transfer tax to the treasurer of state. The bill changes the remittances of the transfer tax by the county recorder and requires the remittances of the transfer tax by the county recorder be made to the department of revenue. DIVISION IX —— BOARD OF REVIEW ELIGIBILITY.32 relating to the removal of a member of a board of review by specifying that if a board member is removed under that Code section, the board member shall not be eligible for appointment to a board of review in this state for six years following the date of the removal. DIVISION X —— EQUALIZATION ADJUSTMENTS —— APPEALS.48 to provide that, in addition to the board of supervisors or the city council, a city or county attorney or other official of the county or assessing jurisdiction may provide written notice of intent to appeal an equalization to the department of revenue. The bill also requires the written notice of appeal to be provided within days of the notice provided by the department of revenue. Upon receiving a timely notice of intent to appeal, the bill requires the department to schedule a hearing on the proposed adjustment with the county or assessing jurisdiction and specifies the allowable formats for the hearing or written presentation of the appeal. The bill specifies that appeals of a proposed adjustment are not subject to Code chapter 17A. DIVISION XI —— BUSINESS PROPERTY TAX CREDIT AND ASSESSMENT LIMITATION. Code chapter 426C provides a business property tax credit for commercial, industrial, and railway property for property taxes due and payable in fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2014. The business property tax credit is funded from an annual standing appropriation of $125 million.2 for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2023, and provides that moneys remaining in the business property tax credit fund at the end of the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022, shall be transferred by the department of revenue for deposit in the general fund of the state. The bill also establishes a future repeal date for Code chapter 426C of July 1, 2024.21 imposes an assessment limitation (rollback) on commercial property, industrial property, and property valued by the department of revenue under Code chapter 434 (railway company property) of percent for assessment years beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The bill modifies the amount and methodology for calculating the assessment limitation for property units, as defined in the bill, within those classifications of property. Instead of a uniform percentage of value, for valuations established for the assessment year beginning January 1, 2022, and each assessment year thereafter, the portion of actual value at which each property unit of commercial property shall be assessed shall be the sum of the following: (1) an amount equal to the product of the assessment limitation percentage applicable to residential property multiplied by the actual value of the property that exceeds $0 but does not exceed $150,000; and (2) an amount equal to percent of the actual value of the property for that assessment year that exceeds $150,000. The bill establishes a similar provision for industrial property and provides that the assessed value of railway company property shall be determined in the same manner as commercial property. The bill also establishes an annual payment to local governments based on the modified assessment limitations imposed on that portion of the value of commercial and industrial properties that does not exceed $150,000. For each fiscal year beginning on or after July 1, 2023, there is appropriated from the general fund of the state to the department of revenue the sum of $125 million to be used for such payments. If an amount appropriated for a fiscal year is insufficient to make all payments, the director of revenue shall prorate the payments to the county treasurers. DIVISION XII —— WAGE ASSIGNMENT NOTICE.17B (administrative wage assignment cooperative agreement). Under the bill, the centralized debt collection facility (facility) within the department of revenue may proceed against an obligor if a days’ notice of intent has been sent to the obligor notifying the obligor the facility intends to begin a wage assignment action. The bill specifies the days’ notice period does not apply if the facility determines the collection of past due amounts would be in jeopardy. After the days’ notice period has run, the bill requires the facility to notify the obligor of the initiation of the wage assignment action within two working days of sending the notice to the obligor’s employer, and the facility may obtain multiple wage assignments, if the obligor has multiple employers. DIVISION XIII —— OUT-OF-STATE RECIPROCAL COLLECTIONS. The bill modifies provisions related to out-of-state reciprocal debt collections. Currently, the provisions are limited to the collection of out-of-state tax debt. The bill expands the types of debt the director is able to collect, and allows the director to enter into an agreement with a department in another state to collect the debts being collected by DOR. The bill allows the director to enter into agreements to collect the debts of another state through DOR. The bill requires the out-of-state debt being collected by DOR to be delinquent and not subject to litigation prior to accepting the collection on such debt. The bill establishes procedures to collect out-of-state debt including procedures for challenging the collection of such debt. The bill allows DOR to collect a fee from the amount of out-of-state debt collected. The bill specifies the DOR may release taxpayer information that otherwise would be confidential when working with an out-of-state department or agency, provided the out-of-state department or agency complies with Iowa confidentiality law. DIVISION XIV —— PASS-THROUGH ENTITY TAXATION. The bill changes the term “state partnership representative” to “state pass-through representative” numerous times. The bill modifies certain penalties for pass-through entities that fail to timely file an income return. The provision takes effect upon enactment and applies retroactively to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2022. The bill permits a pass-through entity filing a composite return that has a nonrefundable income tax credit carryforward amount attributable to the composite return following the close of the entity’s composite return for the tax year that began during the 2021 calendar year to allocate those income tax credit carryforward amounts to the pass-through entity’s partners, members, beneficiaries, or shareholders in the pass-through entity’s tax year that begins during the 2022 calendar year. DIVISION XV —— INHERITANCE TAX —— UNKNOWN HEIRS. Currently, if an heir entitled to an estate interest cannot be found, a tax of percent is paid to the state, until the heir is found, and at such time the correct amount of inheritance tax is recomputed and paid to the state.10. The inheritance tax is set to be repealed for decedents dying on or after January 1, 2025. The division applies retroactively to January 1, 2021. DIVISION XVI —— NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLICATION OF INTEREST RATES. The bill strikes a provision requiring the director to publish the rate of interest in a newspaper, and substitutes this requirement by allowing for the publication of interest rates on the internet site of DOR. DIVISION XVII —— PROPERTY ASSESSMENT APPEAL BOARD —— SALARIES. The general assembly periodically establishes salary ranges for certain appointed state officers and authorizes a person (generally the governor) to establish the salaries of those state officers. In 2013, the general assembly amended the most recent salary range legislation (2008 Iowa Acts, chapter 1191) to add members of the property assessment appeal board to salary range ($73,250 to $112,070). The bill removes members of the property assessment appeal board from the most recent salary range and provides that the salaries of such members shall be set by the governor and be commensurate with the salary of an administrative law judge. DIVISION XVIII —— DUE DATES —— HOLIDAYS.9A that establishes more uniformity for references to due dates and holidays of DOR and makes related conforming changes. DIVISION XIX —— AVIATION AND MARINE FUEL —— CALCULATIONS. The bill specifies the calculations to be used to calculate the amounts to be deposited into the aviation and marine fuel funds. DIVISION XX —— INHERITANCE TAX REPEAL —— SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED CODE CHANGES. The bill delays by two years the due date of the proposed bill DOR must submit to the general assembly for Code updates relating to the inheritance tax repeal. The bill is now required to be submitted to the general assembly by the 2024 regular session of the 90th general assembly.
Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse2
House subcommittee
Named February 16, 2022 (as HSB 724). On February 23, 2022 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 3-0.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Nota fiscal
Resumen con IA This bill makes various changes to the tax and administrative procedures of the Department of Revenue. It is projected to have a minor annual negative impact on General Fund revenue due to changes in inheritance tax for unknown heirs and a maximum annual State cost of $76,000 for increased Property Assessment Appeals Board salaries. The bill also changes the Business Property Tax Credit to an exemption, which would change how the state reimburses local governments for property tax reductions. (en inglés)3
Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)
Description
House File 2552 relates to tax and administrative procedures of the Department of Revenue (Department).
Background — Divisions with No Projected Fiscal Impact The following divisions of the Bill have been determined to have no identifiable fiscal impact:
- Division I — Retention of records determined to be useless.
- Divisions II and III — Electronic return filing requirements for a fiduciary, partnership, pass-through entity, corporation, S corporation, financial institution, or credit union.
- Division IV — Department authority to charge a fee for a copy of a return.
- Division V — Authority of others to act on behalf of a taxpayer.
- Division VI — Electronic communication between the Department and taxpayers.
- Division VII — Failure to furnish required income statements to the Department.
- Division VIII — Remittance of the real estate transfer tax to the Department instead of the Treasurer of State.
- Division IX — Property tax board of review eligibility.
- Division X — Appeals of equalization adjustments.
- Division XII — Wage assignment notice.
- Division XIV — Pass-through entity nonrefundable tax credits.
- Division XVI — Interest rate publication.
- Division XVIII — Due dates.
- Division XIX — Aviation and marine fuel tax refunds.
- Division XX — Delayed due date for report of proposed Iowa Code changes related to the 2021 repeal of the inheritance tax.
Background — Divisions with Minor Projected Fiscal Impacts The following divisions of the Bill have minor projected fiscal impacts:
- Division XIII — Out-of-state reciprocal collections. The Division expands the types of debt that the Department may attempt to collect through reciprocal agreements with other states. The expansion is expected to have a small positive impact on the amount of debt collected through these types of agreements.
- Division XV — Inheritance tax owed by unknown heirs. Under current law, if an heir entitled to an estate interest cannot be found, a tax of 5.0% is paid through the estate. If the heir is found at a later date, the correct amount of inheritance tax is recomputed and the tax amount is adjusted. The Bill reduces the inheritance tax on an unknown heir on the same percentage basis the inheritance tax is being reduced under the provisions of Division V of SF 619 (2021 Taxation and Other Provisions Act). The change is effective retroactively to January 1, 2021, and is projected to have a minor annual negative impact on General Fund revenue until the inheritance tax is repealed (deaths occurring on or after January 1, 2025).
- Division XVII — Property Assessment Appeals Board salary range increase. The Bill changes the salary range for the three State employee positions that form the Property Assessment Appeals Board. Under current law, the salary range is $73,250 to $112,070. The Bill establishes the range as “commensurate with the salary of an administrative law judge.” The current annual salary of an administrative law judge ranges from $93,974 to $133,786. Therefore, the change would allow the top salary to be $21,716 higher than what is allowed under current law. The potential maximum increase in salary for the three positions combined would be $65,148. Including the employer shares of Iowa Public Employees’ Retirement System (IPERS) retirement contributions and Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) tax, the annual additional State cost of the maximum pay increase for all three positions would be $76,000. The positions are paid through the General Fund appropriation to the Department of Revenue.
Background — Division XI — Change to the Business Property Tax Credit The Bill alters the existing Business Property Tax Credit (BPTC) by changing the credit to an exemption and altering how local governments are reimbursed by the State for the property tax reductions associated with the credit/exemption.
Under current law, real property classified as commercial, industrial, or railroad (C/I/RR) is eligible to receive a tax credit for an initial portion of property value. The BPTC process ensures that a specified amount of each business property’s value is taxed in the same manner as a residential property. Property value above the minimum is taxed at 90.0% of its taxable value. The property tax credit is financed by an annual $125.0 million appropriation from the State General Fund. To qualify for the BPTC, an initial application is required. Applications for subsequent years are not required. For calculation of the credit, adjacent parcels with the same or similar ownership and the same or similar use are considered a single property unit with a combined value.
For assessment year 2020 (FY 2022), the initial value to which the BPTC applied equaled $234,663, and a total of 79,822 property units benefited from the credit. Collectively, the total assessed value of all BPTC properties was $50.200 billion. For FY 2022, the statewide total assessed value of C/I/RR property is $56.200 billion, meaning that $6.000 billion (10.6%) of all C/I/RR property did not benefit from the FY 2022 BPTC.
The maximum amount of value that may benefit from the credit (the initial value) has experienced two trends over time:
- Due to Iowa’s two-year assessment cycle, the residential rollback tends to oscillate up and down slightly between odd-numbered and even-numbered assessment years. For the calculation of the current credit, this causes the difference between the C/I/RR rollback and the residential rollback to adjust, resulting in the $125.0 million tax credit appropriation covering more initial value in even-numbered years than in odd-numbered years.
- The revaluation of existing C/I/RR properties valued below the initial value, combined with newly constructed C/I/RR properties, causes the $125.0 million appropriation to cover less initial value in one year compared to the value covered two years earlier. In recent years, this trend has caused the initial value to drop about $16,000 every two years.
Assumptions
Current law — The Legislative Services Agency (LSA) utilized claim information from the 79,822 property units that received the BPTC for FY 2022 to project the initial value and tax credits awarded under existing law on a property-by-property basis using the following facts and assumptions:
- Beginning with FY 2024, property that until that fiscal year was classified as telecom property and assessed under Iowa Code chapter 433 will be reclassified and taxed as commercial property and will become eligible for the BPTC. The Fiscal Note for the Act that enacted this classification change (SF 2388 — 2018 Telecommunications Taxation Act) estimated that the total assessed value of telecom property that would be assessed as commercial property starting in FY 2024 was $304.7 million. This amount is 0.6% of the projected value of C/I/RR property eligible for the BPTC in FY 2024.
- For FY 2024, the $125.0 million in total BPTC claims translates to a tax rate of $2.28 per $1,000 of taxed value for existing C/I/RR BPTC property. For calculating the portion of the BPTC that will be utilized by former telecom property starting with FY 2024, the $304.7 million in assessed telecom value is assumed to benefit at the same rate as existing C/I/RR BPTC claimants. This results in an estimated $0.7 million in BPTC awarded to former telecom property in FY 2024.
- Over the past 10 years, the total assessed value of C/I/RR property has increased an average of 3.4% for even-numbered years and 4.9% for odd-numbered years. Assessment year 2015 (FY 2017) was not included in the average calculation due to changes in property classifications that year. The odd and even growth factors were applied respectively to each property within the database for fiscal years 2023 through 2030, including the aggregated former telecom property.
- For each property benefiting from the BPTC, the actual FY 2022 consolidated property tax rate is assumed to be constant for all future years. For former telecom property, the tax rate is assumed to be $35.13 per $1,000 of taxed value.
- For each year, the C/I/RR rollback, residential rollback, and initial value projections are provided in Table 1. Applying the projected calculation factors from Table 1 to the 79,822 individual properties plus the former telecom value produces a projected tax credit amount for each property for each fiscal year from FY 2024 through FY 2029.
Proposed Law — The LSA utilized the same 79,822 property dataset as current law to project the benefit for each property if the current tax credit was switched to a tax exemption calculation based on $150,000 of initial value. The same tax rate, assessed value growth, and additional telecom property assumptions as current law were used for the proposed law comparison. In addition, the projection was adjusted to account for the 10.6% ($6.000 billion) of existing C/I/RR property value that does not currently benefit from the BPTC. These additional C/I/RR properties will automatically be included in the proposed partial tax exemption and State General Fund reimbursement to local governments. Like the addition of telecom property under current law, the properties that are not currently benefiting from the BPTC are assumed to be similar in value and tax rate to those that are now benefiting from the BPTC. Combining the rollback differential shown in Table 1 with the projected assessed values for every property, including adjustments for former telecom property and property that is currently not part of the BPTC claim dataset, and utilizing the proposed $150,000 constant initial value asCurrent Law Assessment Fiscal Residential C/I/RR Rollback Initial
Year Year Rollback Rollback Differential Value
AY 2022 FY 2024 55.4323% 90.0000% 34.5677% 212,928$ AY 2023 FY 2025 53.8635% 90.0000% 36.1365% 194,280 AY 2024 FY 2026 55.1592% 90.0000% 34.8408% 201,808 AY 2025 FY 2027 53.5981% 90.0000% 36.4019% 185,099 AY 2026 FY 2028 54.8874% 90.0000% 35.1126% 192,169 AY 2027 FY 2029 53.3340% 90.0000% 36.6660% 177,183 Projected Business Property Tax Credit Calculation Factors Table 1 provided in the Bill produces a projected tax exemption benefit amount for each property for each fiscal year from FY 2024 through FY 2029.
Current Law Compared to Proposed Law — The current BPTC taxes a portion of a business property’s assessed value like it was residential value. This is accomplished by having the State General Fund pay a portion of the property taxes due on a BPTC property. The proposal accomplishes the same thing by exempting a portion of a business property’s value from property taxation, then reimbursing the local government property tax system for up to $125.0 million of the resulting tax reduction.
The biggest difference between current law and the Bill is the level of the initial value. Current law taxes more than $200,000 of a property’s assessed value at the lower residential rollback, while the proposal applies the reduction to a fixed $150,000. This difference means:
- Taxpayers with properties assessed at $150,000 or less will receive the same benefit under the Bill as they do under current law.
- Existing BPTC properties and former telecom properties with an assessed value above $150,000 will see a property tax increase under the Bill, and that increase, when compared to current law, is projected to remain until at least FY 2030.
- Owners of C/I/RR properties that are not currently receiving the benefit of the BPTC will see a property tax reduction under the Bill.
- The $125.0 million standing General Fund appropriation for local government reimbursement exceeds the projected level of claims for FY 2024 through FY 2029. Proration of local government reimbursement claims is projected to start with FY 2030.
Fiscal Impact
The Bill eliminates an existing $125.0 million standing General Fund appropriation that finances the BPTC and replaces it with a standing General Fund appropriation of up to $125.0 million to be used to reimburse local governments for the tax reduction associated with the property tax exemption that replaces the BPTC. Through FY 2029, the full $125.0 million would not be needed as the property tax increases for BPTC properties with assessed values in excess of $150,000 are projected to be larger than the property tax decreases realized by properties that will benefit from the new exemption but did not benefit from the BPTC. In addition, the Bill requires that the balance in the BPTC Fund revert to the State General Fund once the BPTC is eliminated. The balance is projected to be $2.3 million. The final column of Table 2 shows the Bill’s projected reduction in annual appropriations from the State General Fund.Eliminate New Local BPTC Net Change in
Fiscal Existing Government Fund General Fund
Year Tax Credit Reimbursement Reversion Appropriation Level FY 2024 -125.0$ 112.1$ -2.3$ -15.2$ FY 2025 -125.0 118.7 -6.3 FY 2026 -125.0 115.7 -9.3 FY 2027 -125.0 122.3 -2.7 FY 2028 -125.0 118.7 -6.3 FY 2029 -125.0 124.7 -0.3
In Millions
State General Fund Appropriation Projections
Table 2 Through FY 2029, the General Fund appropriation is not projected to be prorated as the reimbursement claims are expected to be less than $125.0 million. Proration of the reimbursement claims, projected to start with FY 2030, would result in a negative impact on local government revenue when compared to the existing BPTC process.
Sources
- Department of Management property value and rate files
- Legislative Services Agency analysis
- Department of Revenue
- Final Fiscal Note — Department of Revenue Omnibus · 23 de junio de 2022
- Department of Revenue Omnibus · 9 de marzo de 2022
- Department of Revenue Omnibus · 8 de marzo de 2022
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Modifica§2.48§331.512§331.559§357H.9§403.20§421.17§421.17A§421.17B§421.1A§421.24§421.59§421.60§421.7§421.9§422.14§422.15§422.16§422.16B§422.25A§422.25B§422.25C§422.36§422.37§422.62§422.68§423.50§426C.2§428A.8§428A.9§441.21§441.32§441.48§450.93§452A.61§452A.82§452A.84§453A.10§453A.14§533.329
Cita§422.13
Cabildeo
2 a favor · 5 en contra · 28 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Study bill
89th General Assembly