Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General
Relating to public safety nuisances concerning licensed premises where alcoholic beverages, wine, or beer is sold or consumed
Presentado por el comité Public Safety de la Cámara
Temas:Alcohol, cannabis & gamingFirearmsPublic safety & emergencies
La misma legislación: HSB 633
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado1 de febrero de 2022
- Hecho: Subcomité1 de febrero de 2022
- Hecho: Comité de la Cámara9 de febrero de 2022
- Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara28 de febrero de 202274–19
- Hecho: Comité del Senado16 de marzo de 2022
- Hecho: Lo aprueba el Senado6 de abril de 202247–0
- Hecho: A gobernador(a)1 de junio de 2022
- Hecho: Firmado como ley9 de junio de 2022
Firmado como ley ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA Local attorneys can sue to stop dangerous activities at businesses like bars if shootings, weapon use, or riots happen on the property at least three times in a year. A judge can then order the business to fix these problems to make the area safe again. These rules do not apply to restaurants that make most of their money from selling food. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill establishes the requirements for establishing and abating a public safety nuisance under Code chapter 123.56 provides that a public safety nuisance exists when it is established by clear and convincing evidence that an owner, manager, employee, contemporaneous patron, or guest of the licensed premises unlawfully discharges a firearm or uses an offensive weapon, assaults another person with a dangerous weapon, or engages in a riot on at least three separate days within any 12-month period, on the premises, on any property contiguous to the premises, or within 500 feet of the premises. The bill provides that if the county attorney or city attorney where the licensed premises is located believes a public safety nuisance exists, the county attorney or city attorney, or attorney acting at the direction of the county attorney or city attorney, may file a suit in equity in district court without bond seeking abatement of the public safety nuisance. The bill then describes evidence that may be considered in an action seeking abatement of the public safety nuisance. The bill provides that if the district court finds that a public safety nuisance exists, the court may enter judgment declaring the existence of the nuisance and order such remedial action as the court determines reasonable to abate the nuisance. The bill describes appropriate remedial action that may be taken by the district court. Finally, the bill excludes from the provisions of the bill a licensed premises that is also a food establishment where at least half of the establishment’s gross income is derived from food-related sales.
Cambiado después por la enmienda S-5071; vea Enmiendas.
Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse2
Senate subcommittee
Named March 2, 2022. On March 9, 2022 it recommended amendment and passage.
- Sen. Chris Cournoyer R
- Sen. Tony Bisignano DEmail
- Sen. Nate Boulton D
- Sen. Dan Dawson REmail
- Sen. R. Smith
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Crea§123.56
Cabildeo
8 a favor · 1 en contra · 15 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Study bill
89th General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.
- HF 2306 Relating to public safety nuisances concerning licensed premises where alcoholic beverages…88th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage · same titleCleared committee
- SSB 3127 SSB 312788th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage · very similarCleared committee
Matched by wording or an identical title.