Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General

HF 2338Murió al terminar la sesión · 23 de febrero de 2022

Relating to the apportionment of district associate judges

Presentado por el comité Judiciary (companion To Sf 2241 By Committee on Judiciary) de la Cámara

Temas:Courts & civil law

La misma legislación: SSB 3020, HSB 591, SF 2241

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado20 de enero de 2022
  2. Hecho: Subcomité20 de enero de 2022
  3. Hecho: Comité de la Cámara9 de febrero de 2022
  4. Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara23 de febrero de 202297–0
  5. Hecho: Comité del Senado17 de marzo de 2022
  6. Se detuvo: Lo aprueba el SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2022 terminó el 24 de mayo de 2022, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA Instead of using county population to decide how many district associate judges are needed, this law would use a formula based on how much work they have. If a judge leaves their job, the vacancy will only be filled if the area needs more judges under this new system. Current judges will not be removed even if the new formula says their area needs fewer people. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to the apportionment of district associate judges. The bill provides a new formula to be prescribed when appointing judges based upon a weighted workload. Under current law, district associate judges are apportioned based upon county population. The bill defines the term “vacancy” to mean the death, resignation, retirement, or removal of a district associate judge, or the failure of a district associate judge to be retained in office at the judicial election, or an increase in judgeships. The bill provides that in districts that currently have more district associate judges than the new formulas prescribed, vacancies shall not be filled and incumbents shall not be removed because of a reduction in number of authorized judgeships, while districts having fewer or the same shall fill vacancies as they occur. In judicial districts that contain more than one judicial election district, a vacancy in a judicial election district shall not be filled if the total number of district associate judges in all judicial election districts within the judicial district equals or exceeds the aggregate number of judgeships to which all of the judicial election districts of the judicial district are authorized.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)2

House subcommittee

Named January 20, 2022 (as HSB 591). On February 2, 2022 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 3-0.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Modifica§602.6301

Cómo funciona el Código3

Cabildeo

3 a favor · 0 en contra · 5 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree