Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General

HF 2199Murió al terminar la sesión · 1 de febrero de 2022

Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit plans, and utilization review organizations, and including applicability provisions

Presentado por el comité Human Resources (successor To Hf 372) de la Cámara

Temas:Health careInsurance

La misma legislación: HF 372, HF 656

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado4 de febrero de 2021
  2. Hecho: Subcomité10 de febrero de 2021
  3. Hecho: Comité de la Cámara18 de febrero de 2021
  4. Se detuvo: Lo aprueba la CámaraMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  5. Sigue: Comité del Senado
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2022 terminó el 24 de mayo de 2022, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA Health insurance companies and plans would be prohibited from suddenly changing coverage to force people onto cheaper, different prescription drugs if those people are already stable on their current medication. This rule applies to anyone whose doctor has prescribed a specific drug within the last six months and who has already had that drug covered by their plan. If a company denies a request to keep covering a drug, they must follow a fast process to review the decision and allow for appeals. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to the continuity of care for a covered person and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit plans, and utilization review organizations. The bill defines “nonmedical switching” as a health benefit plan’s restrictive changes to the health benefit plan’s formulary after the current plan year has begun or during the open enrollment period for the upcoming plan year, causing a covered person who is medically stable on the covered person’s current prescribed drug as determined by the prescribing health care professional, to switch to a less costly alternate prescription drug. “Health benefit plan”, “health carrier”, and “utilization review organization” are also defined in the bill. The bill provides that during a covered person’s eligibility under a health benefit plan, inclusive of any open enrollment period, a health plan carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization shall not limit or exclude coverage of a prescription drug for the covered person if the covered person is medically stable on the drug as determined by the prescribing health care professional, the drug was previously approved by the health carrier for coverage for the person, and the covered person’s prescribing health care professional has prescribed the drug for the person’s medical condition within the previous six months. The bill includes, as prohibited limitations or exclusions, reducing the maximum coverage of prescription drug benefits, increasing cost sharing for a covered drug, moving a drug to a more restrictive tier, and removing a drug from a formulary. A prescription drug may, however, be removed from a formulary if the United States food and drug administration issues a statement regarding the clinical safety of the drug, or the manufacturer of the drug notifies the United States food and drug administration of a manufacturing discontinuance or potential discontinuance of the drug as required by section 506c of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The bill provides that a drug product with the same generic name and demonstrated bioavailability, or an interchangeable biological product, is considered equivalent to the prescription drug prescribed by the covered person’s health care professional. The bill requires a covered person and prescribing health care professional to have access to a process to request a coverage exemption determination. The bill defines “coverage exemption determination” as a determination made by a health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization whether to cover a prescription drug that is otherwise excluded from coverage. A coverage exemption determination request must be approved or denied by the health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization within five calendar days, or within hours if exigent circumstances exist. If a determination is not received within the applicable time period the coverage exemption is deemed granted. The bill requires a coverage exemption to be expeditiously granted for a health benefit plan that is discontinued for the next plan year if a covered person enrolls in a comparable plan offered by the same health carrier, and in comparison to the discontinued health benefit plan, the new health benefit plan limits or reduces the maximum coverage for a prescription drug, increases cost sharing for the prescription drug, moves the prescription drug to a more restrictive tier, or excludes the prescription drug from the formulary. If a coverage exemption is granted, the bill requires an authorization of coverage that is no more restrictive than that offered in the discontinued health benefit plan, or than that offered prior to implementation of restrictive changes to the health benefit plan’s formulary after the current plan year began. If a determination is made to deny a request for a coverage exemption, the reason for denial and the procedure to appeal the denial must be provided to the requestor. Any determination to deny a coverage exemption may be appealed to the health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization. A determination to uphold or reverse denial of a coverage exemption must be made within five calendar days of receipt of an appeal, or within hours if exigent circumstances exist. If a determination is not made within the applicable time period, the denial is deemed reversed and the coverage exemption is deemed approved. If a determination to deny a coverage exemption is upheld on appeal, the reason for upholding the denial and the procedure to request external review of the denial pursuant to Code chapter 514J must be provided to the individual who filed the appeal. Any denial of a request for a coverage exemption that is upheld on appeal is considered a final adverse determination for purposes of Code chapter 514J and is eligible for a request for external review by a covered person or the covered person’s authorized representative pursuant to Code chapter 514J. The bill shall not be construed to prevent a health care professional from prescribing another drug covered by the health carrier that the health care professional deems medically necessary for the covered person. The bill shall not be construed to prevent a health carrier from adding a drug to its formulary, or from removing a drug from its formulary if the drug manufacturer removes the drug for sale in the United States. The bill allows the commissioner to take any necessary enforcement action under the commissioner’s authority to enforce compliance with the bill. The bill is applicable to health benefit plans that are delivered, issued for delivery, continued, or renewed in this state on or after January 1, 2023.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)2

Nota fiscal

Resumen con IA This bill prohibits health plans from switching a person's prescribed drug to a less costly alternative for nonmedical reasons and establishes a process for requesting coverage exemptions. The bill is expected to increase pharmacy costs for the State of Iowa Insurance Plan, with an estimated increase ranging from a minimum of $970,000 to a maximum of $5.8 million. While the bill's provisions for nonmedical switching in approved cases are estimated to reduce expenses for the state, the total fiscal impact cannot be determined. (en inglés)3

Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)

Description

House File 2199 relates to the continuity of care for a person covered by a health benefit plan and does the following:

  • Prohibits nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit plans, and utilization review organizations.
  • Allows a prescription drug to be removed from a formulary if the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issues a statement regarding the clinical safety of the drug or the manufacturer notifies the FDA of a manufacturing discontinuance or potential discontinuance of the drug as required by Section 506c of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
  • Provides that a drug product with the same generic name and demonstrated bioavailability, or an interchangeable biological product, is considered equivalent to the prescription drug prescribed by the covered person’s health care professional.
  • Requires a covered person and prescribing health care professional to have access to a process to request a coverage exemption determination.
  • Defines “coverage exemption determination” as a determination made by a health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization whether to cover a prescription drug that is otherwise excluded from coverage.
  • Requires a coverage exemption determination request to be approved or denied by the health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization within five calendar days or within 72 hours under extenuating circumstances.
  • Requires a coverage exemption to be expeditiously granted for a health benefit plan that is discontinued for the next plan year if a covered person enrolls in a comparable plan offered by the same health carrier and, in comparison to the discontinued health benefit plan, the new health benefit plan limits or reduces the maximum coverage for a prescription drug; increases cost-sharing for the prescription drug; moves the prescription drug to a more restrictive tier; or excludes the prescription drug from the formulary.
  • If a coverage exemption is granted, requires an authorization of coverage that is no more restrictive than that offered in a discontinued health benefit plan or than that offered prior to implementation of restrictive changes to the health benefit plan’s formulary after the current plan year began.
  • Requires a reason for denial and a procedure to appeal the denial to be provided to the requestor in the event that a determination is made to deny a request for a coverage exemption.
  • Allows the Insurance Commissioner to take any necessary enforcement action under the Commissioner’s authority to enforce compliance with this Bill.

The Bill applies to health benefit plans that are delivered, issued for delivery, continued, or renewed in the State of Iowa on or after January 1, 2023.

Background

Nonmedical switching is the practice of switching a covered individual’s prescribed drug to a less costly alternative while the individual has been determined to be medically stable while on the drug, without medical reasons given by the individual’s prescribing health care professional. House File 2199 is estimated to impact approximately 25.8% of the population (822,000). This includes individual coverage, fully insured small and large employer groups, self-insured public employees, and the State of Iowa Plan.

Of the individuals not covered by the mandate, approximately 45.2% are covered by government-sponsored health insurance, 23.0% are covered by employer coverage that is governed by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), and the remaining 6.0% are uninsured.

Source: Iowa Insurance Division.

Assumptions

The Bill is expected to increase pharmacy costs for the State of Iowa Insurance Plan by 1.0% to 6.0%.

Fiscal Impact

House File 2199 is estimated to increase the annual cost to the State of Iowa Insurance Plan and will increase expenses from State funds used to pay State employees’ health insurance costs. The estimated increase in pharmacy costs for the State of Iowa Plan range from a minimum impact of $970,000, which is associated with a 1.0% increase in pharmacy costs, to a maximum of $5.8 million, which is associated with a 6.0% increase in pharmacy costs. The Bill’s provisions for nonmedical switching in approved cases is estimated to reduce expenses for the State, which will offset increases in expenses due to changes related to pharmacy costs. However, the fiscal impact cannot be determined.

Sources

  • Iowa Insurance Division
  • Wellmark

Cómo leer una nota fiscal4

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§514F.8

Cómo funciona el Código5

Cabildeo

24 a favor · 11 en contra · 10 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.

  • HF 2089 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    88th General Assembly · Approved by committee · same title
    Cleared committee
  • SF 292 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    88th General Assembly · Renumbered as SF 489 · same title
    Cleared committee
  • HF 2423 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    88th General Assembly · Approved by committee · nearly identical
    Cleared committee
  • HF 204 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    88th General Assembly · In committee · nearly identical
    Cleared committee

Similar bills this General Assembly

  • SF 178 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    89th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage
    Nearly identical
  • SF 2016 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    89th General Assembly · In committee
    Nearly identical
  • HF 96 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    90th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 626
    Very similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.