Proyectos de ley › 89.ª Asamblea General
Relating to the choice of doctor to treat an injured employee under workers’ compensation laws and including applicability date provisions
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado21 de enero de 2021
- Se detuvo: SubcomitéMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: Comité del Senado
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2022 terminó el 24 de mayo de 2022, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA Under this law, employers usually get to pick the doctor who treats an injured worker. However, workers can choose a specific primary care doctor ahead of time if that doctor already has their medical records. Employers must tell their workers about this choice when they are hired and whenever an injury happens. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to the choice of a physician to treat an injured employee under the state’s workers’ compensation laws. The bill allows the employer to choose care unless the employee has predesignated a physician as provided in the bill. The bill gives an employee the right to predesignate a physician who is a primary care provider, who has previously provided treatment to the employee and has retained the employee’s medical records, to provide treatment for a work-related injury. The employer is required to provide written notice to employees of this right upon hire, and periodically during employment, and upon receiving notice of an injury from an employee who has not yet predesignated a physician of their right to do so, in a manner prescribed by the workers’ compensation commissioner. An employer or an employer’s insurer shall not coerce or otherwise attempt to influence an injured employee’s choice of a physician. If the employer fails to provide such notification, an injured employee has the right to choose any physician to provide treatment for the work-related injury and that treatment shall be considered authorized care. If the employer or employee is dissatisfied with the care chosen by the other party, the dissatisfied party is required to communicate the basis of dissatisfaction to the other party in writing and the parties may agree to alternate care reasonably suited to treat the injury. If the parties cannot agree to such alternate care, the dissatisfied party may make an application for alternate care to the commissioner. An application for alternate care is an original proceeding and is treated as a contested case. A party may request that the hearing be held in person, by telephone, or by audio-video conference. The commissioner is required to issue a decision within working days of receipt of an application made pursuant to a telephone hearing or audio-video conference hearing and within days of an in-person hearing. The bill provides that if the employee has chosen care, when it is medically indicated that no significant improvement from an injury is anticipated, the employee may obtain a medical opinion regarding the extent of the employee’s permanent disability from the employee’s physician. If the employer believes that the evaluation of permanent disability obtained by the employee is too high, the employer has the right to obtain another medical opinion from a physician of the employer’s choosing. The bill applies to injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2022.
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Cabildeo
3 a favor · 2 en contra · 10 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Tried before
89th General Assembly
Picked up later
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.
- HF 86 Relating to the choice of doctor to treat an injured employee under workers’ compensation …88th General Assembly · In committee · nearly identicalCleared committee
Similar bills this General Assembly
- SF 365 Relating to the choice of doctor to treat injured employees under workers’ compensation la…90th General Assembly · In committeeVery similar
- SF 456 Relating to the choice of doctor to treat injured employees under workers’ compensation la…91st General Assembly · In committeeVery similar
Matched by wording or an identical title.