Proyectos de ley › 88.ª Asamblea General
SSB 3167
Temas:Courts & civil law
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado12 de febrero de 2020
- Hecho: Subcomité12 de febrero de 2020
- Hecho: Comité del Senado18 de febrero de 2020
- Se saltó: Lo aprueba el SenadoSigue como SF 2337
- Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Ahora es SF 2337 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a SF 2337 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA People suing over health problems caused by asbestos or silica must now file a sworn form explaining the evidence for each claim. If a person cannot provide enough specific evidence against a company, the court can dismiss the case against that company. Additionally, if a person provides false information in their sworn statement, the court can award the defendant money for their legal fees. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to civil actions involving asbestos and silica. The bill requires a plaintiff in an asbestos action, including an action alleging a nonmalignant or a malignant condition, or a silica action involving silicosis, to file with the complaint or other initial pleading a sworn information form specifying the evidence that provides the basis for each claim against each defendant. The sworn information form must contain the information as detailed in the bill. Current law does not require a plaintiff in an asbestos action, including an action alleging a malignant condition, or a silica action involving silicosis, to file a sworn information form stating the basis for each claim against each defendant. The bill directs the court to dismiss an asbestos action or a silica action without prejudice on finding that a plaintiff has failed to make a prima facie case. The court is also required to dismiss an asbestos action or silica action without prejudice as to each defendant for whom a plaintiff lacks reliable defendant-specific evidence of sufficient exposure to asbestos or silica to create a reasonable inference that the plaintiff may be entitled to relief. The court may dismiss the action without prejudice as to all defendants if the plaintiff fails to comply with the requirements for the sworn statement. If a plaintiff’s representations supporting a claim against a defendant are materially false, the bill allows the defendant to move the court to strike the plaintiff’s pleading as to that defendant and to award the defendant attorney fees, costs, and any other relief the court determines is just and proper in the circumstances. _____ The provisions in the bill apply to asbestos actions, including actions alleging a nonmalignant or malignant condition, or silica actions involving silicosis filed on or after July 1, 2020.
Cambiado después por las enmiendas H-8134, S-5015; vea Enmiendas.
Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse2
Senate subcommittee
Named February 12, 2020. On February 17, 2020 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Modifica§686B.3
Cabildeo
13 a favor · 5 en contra · 8 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
88th General Assembly