Proyectos de ley › 88.ª Asamblea General
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado11 de febrero de 2020
- Hecho: Subcomité11 de febrero de 2020
- Hecho: Comité del Senado19 de febrero de 2020
- Se saltó: Lo aprueba el SenadoSigue como SF 2338
- Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Ahora es SF 2338 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a SF 2338 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA People suing healthcare providers for injuries or death would no longer be able to ask a jury to increase the $250,000 limit on money for things like pain and suffering. The law would also limit evidence about medical bills to only show the amounts that were actually paid or are truly owed. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to civil actions, including the total amount of noneconomic damages recoverable in a civil action for personal injury or death against a health care provider and evidence offered to prove past medical expenses. _____ a substantial or permanent loss or impairment of a bodily function, substantial disfigurement, or death, which warrants a finding that imposition of such a limitation would deprive the plaintiff of just compensation for the injuries sustained. Current law also provides that the limitation on damages shall not apply as to a defendant if the defendant’s actions constituted actual malice. The bill eliminates the exception to the limitation of $250,000 that would allow the jury to determine if the imposition of such a limitation would deprive the plaintiff of just compensation for the injuries sustained. Under the bill, “noneconomic damages” means damages arising from pain, suffering, inconvenience, physical impairment, mental anguish, emotional pain and suffering, loss of chance, loss of consortium, or any other nonpecuniary damages. The bill also provides that evidence offered to prove past medical expenses shall be limited to evidence of the amounts that were actually paid to satisfy bills that have been satisfied and evidence of the amounts necessary to satisfy the bills that have not yet been satisfied. The bill does not impose an affirmative duty to seek a reduction in billed charges to which the party is not contractually entitled.
Cambiado después por las enmiendas H-8204, H-8173; vea Enmiendas.
Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse2
Senate subcommittee
Named February 11, 2020. On February 17, 2020 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Crea§622.4
Modifica§147.136A
Cabildeo
35 a favor · 9 en contra · 6 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Study bill
88th General Assembly