Bills › 88th General Assembly
SSB 3127
Topics:Alcohol, cannabis & gamingCourts & civil lawPublic safety & emergencies
Same legislation: HF 2306
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 6, 2020
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 6, 2020
- Stopped: Senate committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: House committee
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2020 session adjourned on June 14, 2020, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Local officials can take legal action against businesses with liquor licenses if dangerous activities like shootings or riots happen on their property or nearby multiple times in a year. If a court decides the business is a public safety nuisance, a judge can order specific steps to fix the problem. These legal cases will be handled quickly by the courts to address the safety issues.1
Read the official explanation
_____ abating a public safety nuisance under Code chapter 123.56 provides that a public safety nuisance exists when it is established by clear and convincing evidence that an owner, manager, employee, contemporaneous patron, or guest of a premises licensed under Code chapter 123 unlawfully discharges a firearm or uses an offensive weapon, assaults another person with a dangerous weapon, or engages in a riot on at least three separate days within any 12-month period, on the premises or within 1,500 feet of the premises. The bill provides that if the county attorney or city attorney where the licensed premises is located believes a public safety nuisance exists, the county attorney or city attorney, or attorney acting at the direction of the county attorney or city attorney, may file a suit in equity in district court without bond seeking abatement of the public safety nuisance. The bill provides that a public safety nuisance action shall be given priority over other business pending before the district court and the trial shall begin within days after the filing of the action. The bill then describes evidence that may be considered in an action seeking abatement of the public safety nuisance. Finally, the bill provides that if the district court finds that a public safety nuisance exists, the court may enter judgment declaring the existence of the nuisance and order such remedial action as the court determines reasonable to abate the nuisance. The bill describes appropriate remedial action that may be taken by the district court. The bill also provides that the new Code section shall be the exclusive method for establishing and abating a public safety nuisance as described in the new Code section.
Senate subcommittee
Named February 6, 2020. On February 13, 2020 it recommended amendment and passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Family tree
Study bill
88th General Assembly
Picked up later
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Similar bills
- HSB 633 HSB 63389th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 2340Very similar
Matched by wording or an identical title.