Bills › 88th General Assembly

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 22, 2020
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 13, 2020
  3. Done: Senate committeeFebruary 19, 2020
  4. Skipped: Passes the SenateContinued as SF 2383
  5. Next: House committee
  6. Next: Passes the House
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Became SF 2383 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 2383 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary Health insurance companies and benefit plans would be prohibited from suddenly changing coverage to force people onto cheaper, different prescription drugs if those people are already stable on their current medication. If a doctor confirms a patient is medically stable on a drug that was previously covered, the insurance provider cannot increase costs or remove that drug from the plan's list. Patients and doctors can request an exemption to keep their specific medication, and insurance companies must respond to these requests very quickly.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to the continuity of care for a covered person and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit plans, and utilization review organizations. The bill defines “nonmedical switching” as a health benefit plan’s restrictive changes to the health benefit plan’s formulary after the current plan year has begun or during the open enrollment period for the upcoming plan year, causing a covered person who is medically stable on the covered person’s current prescribed drug as determined by the prescribing health care professional, to switch to a less costly alternate prescription drug. _____ condition within the previous six months. The bill includes, as prohibited limitations or exclusions, reducing the maximum coverage of prescription drug benefits, increasing cost sharing for a covered drug, moving a drug to a more restrictive tier, and removing a drug from a formulary. A prescription drug may, however, be removed from a formulary if the United States food and drug administration issues a statement regarding the clinical safety of the drug, or the manufacturer of the drug notifies the United States food and drug administration of a manufacturing discontinuance or potential discontinuance of the drug as required by section 506c of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The bill provides that a drug product with the same generic name and demonstrated bioavailability, or an interchangeable biological product, is considered equivalent to the prescription drug prescribed by the covered person’s health care professional. The bill requires a covered person and prescribing health care professional to have access to a process to request a coverage exemption determination. The bill defines “coverage exemption determination” as a determination made by a health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization whether to cover a prescription drug that is otherwise excluded from coverage. A coverage exemption determination request must be approved or denied by the health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization within hours, or within hours if exigent circumstances exist. If a determination is not received within the applicable time period the coverage exemption is deemed granted. _____ increases cost sharing for the prescription drug, moves the prescription drug to a more restrictive tier, or excludes the prescription drug from the formulary. If a coverage exemption is granted, the bill requires an authorization of coverage that is no more restrictive than that offered in a discontinued health benefit plan, or than that offered prior to implementation of restrictive changes to the health benefit plan’s formulary after the current plan year began. If a determination is made to deny a request for a coverage exemption, the reason for denial and the procedure to appeal the denial must be provided to the requestor. Any determination to deny a coverage exemption may be appealed to the health carrier, health benefit plan, or utilization review organization. A determination to uphold or reverse denial of a coverage exemption must be made within hours of receipt of an appeal, or within hours if exigent circumstances exist. If a determination is not made within the applicable time period, the denial is deemed reversed and the coverage exemption is deemed approved. If a determination to deny a coverage exemption is upheld on appeal, the reason for upholding the denial and the procedure to request external review of the denial pursuant to Code chapter 514J must be provided to the individual who filed the appeal. Any denial of a request for a coverage exemption that is upheld on appeal is considered a final adverse determination for purposes of Code chapter 514J and is eligible for a request for external review by a covered person or the covered person’s authorized representative pursuant to Code chapter 514J. The bill shall not be construed to prevent a health care professional from prescribing another drug covered by the health carrier that the health care professional deems medically necessary for the covered person. _____ from adding a drug to its formulary or removing a drug from its formulary if the drug manufacturer removes the drug for sale in the United States. The bill allows the commissioner to take any necessary enforcement action under the commissioner’s authority to enforce compliance with the bill. The bill is applicable to health benefit plans that are delivered, issued for delivery, continued, or renewed in this state on or after January 1, 2021.

Full bill text2

Senate subcommittee

Named February 13, 2020. Meeting: Tuesday, February 18 · 2:00 PM · RM 315.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§514F.8

How the Code works3

Lobbying

24 for · 8 against · 32 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Similar bills

  • HF 372 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    89th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 656
    Nearly identical
  • SF 178 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    89th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage
    Nearly identical
  • SF 2016 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    89th General Assembly · In committee
    Nearly identical
  • HF 204 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    88th General Assembly · In committee
    Nearly identical
  • HF 96 Relating to continuity of care and nonmedical switching by health carriers, health benefit…
    90th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 626
    Very similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.