Proyectos de ley › 88.ª Asamblea General

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado15 de enero de 2020
  2. Hecho: Subcomité30 de enero de 2020
  3. Hecho: Comité del Senado5 de febrero de 2020
  4. Se saltó: Lo aprueba el SenadoSigue como SF 2180
  5. Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Ahora es SF 2180 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a SF 2180 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

La explicación oficial está en inglés; todavía no hay resumen en palabras sencillas.

This bill requires any governmental entity which exercises jurisdiction over a highway to construct and maintain rumble strips on certain highways. The bill defines the term “rumble strips”. Under the bill, rumble strips are required in advance of all stop signs and traffic-control signals located on a highway where the highway enters or crosses a primary highway. However, rumble strips are not required on unpaved highways, on highways inside the limits of any incorporated city, or on highways with a speed limit of less than miles per hour.

Lea la explicación completa

3.2, subsection 3, which would relieve a political subdivision from complying with a state mandate if funding for the cost of the state mandate is not provided or specified. _____ political subdivisions are required to comply with any state mandate included in the bill.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)1

Senate subcommittee

Named January 30, 2020. On February 5, 2020 it recommended passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Nota fiscal

House File 2004 is estimated to cost the Primary Road Fund an additional $450,000 for the installation of rumble strips on primary highways. 0 million for rumble strip installation on county roads throughout the State.

Cómo leer una nota fiscal2

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§321.260A

Cómo funciona el Código3

Cabildeo

0 a favor · 0 en contra · 10 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree