Bills › 88th General Assembly
SSB 3101
Topics:Transportation
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedJanuary 15, 2020
- Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 30, 2020
- Done: Senate committeeFebruary 5, 2020
- Skipped: Passes the SenateContinued as SF 2180
- Next: House committee
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Became SF 2180 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 2180 What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
This bill requires any governmental entity which exercises jurisdiction over a highway to construct and maintain rumble strips on certain highways. The bill defines the term “rumble strips”. Under the bill, rumble strips are required in advance of all stop signs and traffic-control signals located on a highway where the highway enters or crosses a primary highway. However, rumble strips are not required on unpaved highways, on highways inside the limits of any incorporated city, or on highways with a speed limit of less than miles per hour.
Read the full explanation
3.2, subsection 3, which would relieve a political subdivision from complying with a state mandate if funding for the cost of the state mandate is not provided or specified. _____ political subdivisions are required to comply with any state mandate included in the bill.
Senate subcommittee
Named January 30, 2020. On February 5, 2020 it recommended passage.
- Sen. Tim L. Kapucian R
- Sen. Chris Cournoyer R
- Sen. Giddens
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Fiscal note
House File 2004 is estimated to cost the Primary Road Fund an additional $450,000 for the installation of rumble strips on primary highways. 0 million for rumble strip installation on county roads throughout the State.
- Rumble Strips, Highway Intersections · February 12, 2020
- Rumble Strips, Highway Intersections · February 11, 2020
Family tree
Study bill
88th General Assembly