Proyectos de ley › 88.ª Asamblea General
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado30 de enero de 2020
- Hecho: Subcomité30 de enero de 2020
- Hecho: Comité del Senado26 de febrero de 2020
- Se saltó: Lo aprueba el SenadoSigue como SF 2394
- Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Ahora es SF 2394 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a SF 2394 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
La explicación oficial está en inglés; todavía no hay resumen en palabras sencillas.
This bill relates to the custody and control of courthouses and to physical facilities provided by a city or county to the district court. Currently, the county auditor has general custody and control of the courthouse, subject to the direction of the county board of supervisors. The bill strikes the “general custody and control” provision and makes the county auditor the person who has custody and control of a courthouse, subject to the direction of the county board of supervisors. The bill provides that if a law library is provided in the county courthouse, the board of supervisors shall supervise and control the law library in a manner that aids judicial operations.
Lea la explicación completa
1303 provides that a county or city shall provide for the district court of the county with physical facilities, which in the judgment of the governing body are suitable for the district court. Furthermore, the Code section provides that if the county board of supervisors decides not to keep space for the district court, subject to the approval of the supreme court, the county may enter into an agreement with a contiguous county in the same judicial district to share costs in providing physical facilities for a district court. The bill provides that the physical facilities remain the sole property of the county or city and shall be subject to the exclusive control of the county or city, and that the county or city shall provide physical security for, and shall control physical access to, such facilities in a manner that aids judicial operations. The bill provides that the county board of supervisors or the city council’s determination of the adequacy and reasonableness of the security and accessibility of the physical facilities shall be nonjusticiable, and that a court does not have jurisdiction to hear a matter involving the adequacy or reasonableness of the facilities. _____ need the approval of the supreme court to elect not to maintain court space and to enter into an agreement with a contiguous county to share court costs.
Senate subcommittee
Named January 30, 2020. On February 17, 2020 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Cabildeo
8 a favor · 2 en contra · 9 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Study bill
88th General Assembly