Proyectos de ley › 88.ª Asamblea General
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado6 de febrero de 2019
- Hecho: Subcomité4 de febrero de 2019
- Hecho: Comité del Senado14 de febrero de 2019
- Hecho: Lo aprueba el Senado11 de marzo de 201935–11
- Se saltó: Comité de la CámaraSe saltó
- Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara14 de marzo de 201952–44
- Hecho: A gobernador(a)26 de marzo de 2019
- Hecho: Firmado como ley27 de marzo de 2019
SF 274 se hizo ley → La misma legislación se aprobó como SF 274, así que esta versión se dejó de lado. Ir a SF 274 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
La explicación oficial está en inglés; todavía no hay resumen en palabras sencillas.
This bill relates to public forums, freedom of expression, and freedom of association at community colleges and regents universities. DEFINITIONS. _____ areas of campus”, “public institution of higher education”, “student”, and “student organization” for purposes of the new Code chapter established by the bill. POLICY ADOPTION. The bill requires the boards governing the public postsecondary institutions to adopt a policy that includes statements describing the functions and roles of institutions with regard to knowledge; protected speech; the freedom to discuss within the bounds of the established principles of the first amendment to the United States Constitution; freedom to assemble and engage in spontaneous expressive activities subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions; and public areas of campuses as traditional public forums.
Lea la explicación completa
PROTECTED ACTIVITIES. Protected activities include noncommercial expressive activities including oral or written means to communicate ideas, including all forms of peaceful assembly, protests, speeches including by invited speakers, distribution of literature, and circulating petitions. A member of the campus community who wishes to engage in noncommercial expressive activity on campus shall be permitted to do so freely subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions. However, nothing in the provision shall be interpreted as preventing the institutions from prohibiting, limiting, or restricting unprotected expression. A public postsecondary institution shall not deny a student organization any benefit or privilege available to any other student organization. However, nothing in the bill shall be interpreted as limiting the right of student expression in a counter demonstration held on campus so long as the conduct at the counter demonstration is not unlawful and does not materially and substantially prohibit the free expression rights of others or disrupt the functioning of the institution. PUBLIC FORUMS ON CAMPUS —— FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION. _____ forums. The institutions may maintain and enforce clear, published, reasonable content-neutral and viewpoint-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions that are narrowly tailored in furtherance of a significant institutional interest, shall allow members of the campus community to engage in spontaneous expressive activity and to distribute literature, shall provide for ample alternative means of expression, and shall not designate any area of campus a free-speech zone or otherwise create policies restricting expressive activities to a particular outdoor area of campus. Such provisions shall not be construed to grant individuals the right to disrupt the expressive activity of a person or student organization if the institution has reserved space in an outdoor area of campus for the person’s or organization’s activity. REMEDIES, STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, AND IMMUNITY PROVISIONS. An aggrieved member of the campus community may bring an action against the institution responsible for a violation of the Code chapter and seek appropriate relief, and may assert such violation as a defense or counterclaim. Such person has one year after the day the cause of action accrues to bring a claim for violation of the Code chapter. However, nothing in the bill shall be interpreted to limit any other available remedies to a member of the campus community. STATE MANDATE —— INAPPLICABILITY PROVISION.3.2, subsection 3, which would relieve a political subdivision from complying with a state mandate if funding for the cost of the state mandate is not provided or specified. Therefore, political subdivisions are required to comply with any state mandate included in the bill. EFFECTIVE DATE. The bill takes effect upon enactment.
Cambiado después por la enmienda S-3015; vea Enmiendas.
Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse1
Senate subcommittee
Named February 4, 2019. On February 7, 2019 it recommended amendment and passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Nota fiscal
Resumen con IA Senate File 274 requires community colleges and state universities to adopt new policies regarding free speech and public forums on their campuses. The fiscal impact of increased litigation costs for these institutions and potential security costs for large events cannot be estimated. (en inglés)2
Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)
Description
Senate File 274 requires the Board of Regents and the boards of directors of the community colleges to adopt policies regarding free speech on campuses. The Bill requires that the policies include specific provisions regarding the proper function and role of the institutions of higher education, the freedoms to be afforded students, and the use of public areas of campus for public forums.
The Bill identifies protected activities for members of a campus community and specifies certain responsibilities of the institutions. The Bill deems the outdoor areas of the institutions’ campuses to be public forums. The Bill excludes areas outside of campus health care facilities from being considered or designated public forums.
The Bill provides remedies for members of a campus community who are aggrieved by a violation of the legislation and specifies that the legislation does not make any administrator, officer, employee, or agent of an institution personally liable for acts taken pursuant to the individual’s official duties.
The Bill may include a State mandate as defined in Iowa Code section 25B.3. The Bill takes effect upon enactment.
Fiscal Impact
Senate File 274 may have a fiscal impact related to increased future exposure to litigation for the community colleges and State universities; however, the number of future complaints related to campus free speech provisions required in the Bill is unknown. In addition, the legal and settlement costs incurred by the State or by the institutions because of future litigation cannot be estimated. There may also be a fiscal impact related to the need for increased security for large events. The number of such events or the security costs cannot be estimated.
Sources
- Board of Regents
- Iowa Association of Community College Trustees
- Final Fiscal Note – College Campus Free Speech · 14 de mayo de 2019
- College Campus Free Speech · 11 de marzo de 2019
- College Campus Free Speech · 18 de febrero de 2019
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Cabildeo
10 a favor · 9 en contra · 15 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Similar bills
- HF 568 Relating to speech and expression at school districts and providing for remedies89th General Assembly · In committeeSimilar
Matched by wording or an identical title.