Relating to an offense involving trespass to agricultural production facilities, providing penalties, and including effective date provisions. Effective 3-14-19

Sponsored by the Senate Agriculture Committee

Topics:Agriculture

Same legislation: SSB 1227, HSB 236, HF 649

Write your legislators about itWhat changed before it passed

Official bill page Lobbyist declarations One-pager to print

Where it is now

Done: IntroducedMarch 6, 2019
Skipped: SubcommitteeSkipped
Done: Senate committeeMarch 6, 2019
Done: Passes the SenateMarch 12, 201941–8
Skipped: House committeeSkipped
Done: Passes the HouseMarch 12, 201965–32
Done: To the GovernorMarch 13, 2019
Done: Signed into lawMarch 14, 2019

Signed into law What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill amends Code chapter 717A, which provides that a person who disrupts agricultural production at an agricultural production facility (facility) is subject to criminal prosecution. A facility is a location where agricultural animals or crops are maintained, and includes related real or personal property. The bill creates the criminal offense of agricultural production facility trespass which involves the use of deception to obtain access to a facility, which is not open to the public, with the intent to cause physical or economic harm or other injury to the facility’s operations, property, or persons.

Read the full explanation

The offense also involves obtaining employment with the agricultural production facility by deception with the intent to cause physical or economic harm or other injury to the facility’s operations, property, or persons. A person who commits agricultural production facility trespass is guilty of a serious misdemeanor for a first offense and an aggravated misdemeanor for a second or subsequent offense. The bill also expressly provides for the application of the conspiracy statute. A person convicted of conspiracy under the bill’s provisions is guilty of a misdemeanor of the same class as the underlying offense. A serious misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than one year and a fine of at least $315 but not more than $1,875. An aggravated misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than two years and a fine of at least $625 but not more than $6,250. The bill takes effect upon enactment.

Changed since by amendment H-1005; see Amendments.

Full bill text · What changed before it passed¹

Fiscal note

Can’t be estimated Compare with other bills

AI summary Senate File 519 creates a new crime for trespassing at agricultural production facilities using deception to cause harm. Because this is a new offense, the resulting cost to the state justice system cannot be estimated.²

Read the fiscal note

Description

Senate File 519 creates the criminal offense of agricultural production facility trespass when a person involves the use of deception to obtain access to an agricultural production facility not open to the public with the intent to cause physical or economic harm or to injure the facility’s operations, property, or persons. A person who commits agricultural production facility trespass is guilty of a serious misdemeanor for a first offense and an aggravated misdemeanor for a second or subsequent offense. The Act also expressly provides for the application of the conspiracy statute under Iowa Code section 706.1. The Act is effective upon enactment.

Background

The enactment of HF 589 (FY 2012 Agricultural Production Facility Fraud Act) made it a crime for persons to obtain access to an agricultural production facility using false pretenses. Several groups challenged the law in court and on January 9, 2019, Senior Federal Judge James Gritzner ruled the law was unconstitutional, saying it violates the First Amendment’s free speech protections.

A serious misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than one year and a fine of at least $315 but not more than $1,875. An aggravated misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than two years and a fine of at least $625 but not more than $6,250. In 2018, there were no convictions related to agricultural production facilities or conspiracy. Over the past 10 years, there were four convictions related to agricultural production facilities and 66 for conspiracy.

Assumptions

Other assumptions for the Act include:

Charge, conviction, and sentencing patterns and trends will not change over the projection period.
Prisoner length of stay, revocation rates, plea bargaining, and other criminal justice system policies and practices will not change over the projection period.
A lag effect of six months is assumed from the effective date of this Act to the date of first entry of affected offenders into the correctional system. Senate File 519 was signed by the Governor on March 12, 2019, and took effect upon enactment.

Correctional Impact

The correctional impact of SF 519 cannot be determined. The Act establishes a new criminal offense and the number of convictions cannot be estimated.

Table 1 below shows estimates for sentencing to State prison, probation, or Community-Based Corrections (CBC) residential facilities; length of stay (LOS) under those supervisions; and supervision marginal costs per day for all convictions of serious misdemeanors and aggravated misdemeanors in crimes involving persons. Refer to the Legislative Services Agency (LSA) memo addressed to the General Assembly, Cost Estimates Used for Correctional Impact Statements, dated January 8, 2019, for information related to the correctional system. Table 1 — Sentencing Estimates and LOS

Minority Impact

The minority impact of SF 519 is unknown. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Minority Impact Statement, dated January 7, 2019, for information related to minorities in the criminal justice system.

Fiscal Impact

Senate File 519 establishes a new criminal offense, and the resulting cost to the Justice System cannot be estimated. Table 2 shows estimates for the average State cost per offense class type. The estimates include operating costs incurred by the Judicial Branch, the State Public Defender, and the Department of Corrections for one conviction. The cost would be incurred across multiple fiscal years for prison and parole supervision.