Bills › 88th General Assembly
Relating to qualifications to practice law in Iowa and regulation of persons admitted to practice law in a jurisdiction of the United States other than Iowa. Effective 7-1-19
Sponsored by the Senate Judiciary (companion To Hf 322 By Committee on Judiciary) Committee
Topics:Courts & civil law
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 8, 2019
- Skipped: SubcommitteeSkipped
- Done: Senate committeeFebruary 26, 2019
- Done: Passes the SenateApril 9, 201948–0
- Skipped: House committeeSkipped
- Done: Passes the HouseApril 18, 2019
- Done: To the GovernorApril 30, 2019
- Done: Signed into lawMay 1, 2019
Signed into law What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
This bill removes the requirement that an applicant for admission to practice law (be admitted to the bar) in Iowa be a resident of Iowa. The bill, in part, is a response to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. 274 (1985). That case held that a state residency requirement to be admitted to the bar violated the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution. The bill provides that people who are qualified to be admitted to practice law in Iowa at the discretion of the court include not only persons who have been admitted to the bars of any other state or the District of Columbia but also a territory of the United States.
Read the full explanation
Finally, the bill provides that an out-of-state attorney admitted to the bar of the District of Columbia or a territory of the United States may apply to appear pro hac vice in an Iowa case and removes the requirement that the local attorney be a resident of Iowa; however, it maintains the requirement that the local attorney be admitted to practice law in the state of Iowa.
Iowa Code it changes
Lobbying
1 for · 0 against · 7 undecided · Who →
Family tree
88th General Assembly