Proyectos de ley › 88.ª Asamblea General

SF 242Murió al terminar la sesión · 12 de febrero de 2019

Relating to wage discrimination under the Iowa civil rights Act of 1965 and in state contracting, making penalties applicable, and establishing an equal pay task force

Temas:Civil rightsJobs & workers

La misma legislación: HF 89, HF 146, SF 223

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado24 de enero de 2019
  2. Hecho: Subcomité12 de febrero de 2019
  3. Se detuvo: Comité del SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  4. Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
  5. Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2020 terminó el 14 de junio de 2020, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

La explicación oficial está en inglés; todavía no hay resumen en palabras sencillas.

This bill relates to wage discrimination under Code chapter 216, the Iowa civil rights Act of 1965, and state contracting, and establishes an equal pay task force. WAGE DISCRIMINATION IN STATE CONTRACTING. The bill requires a nonstate party to a contract for goods or services with the state to submit certain information regarding each of its employees in a report to the department of administrative services and the civil rights commission annually by January for purposes of ensuring compliance with Code chapters 19B and 216.

Lea la explicación completa

The required information is an employee’s total annual compensation, occupation, sex, race, length of employment, highest level of education attained, and years of experience relevant to the employee’s job. Names of employees shall not be included in the report. WAGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT.6A. Penalty and remedial provisions for discriminatory employment practices, including penalties specific to wage discrimination, are applicable under Code chapter 216 to violations of these requirements. The bill prohibits an employer from requiring that an employee refrain from disclosing, discussing, or sharing information about the amount of the employee’s wages, benefits, or other compensation or from inquiring, discussing, or sharing information about any other employee’s wages, benefits, or other compensation as a condition of employment. The bill prohibits an employer from requiring that an employee sign a waiver or other document that requires an employee to refrain from engaging in any of those activities as a condition of employment. The bill prohibits an employer from discriminating or retaliating against an employee for engaging in any of the activities. The bill prohibits an employer from seeking salary history information from a potential employee as a condition of a job interview or employment. This provision shall not be construed to prohibit a prospective employer from asking a prospective employee what salary level the prospective employee would require in order to accept a job. The bill prohibits an employer from releasing the salary history of any current or former employee to any prospective employer in response to a request as part of an interview or hiring process without written authorization from such current or former employee. The bill prohibits an employer from publishing, listing, or posting within the employer’s organization, with any employment agency, job-listing service, or internet site, or in any other public manner, an advertisement to recruit candidates for hire or independent contractors to fill a position within the employer’s organization without including the minimum rate of pay of the position. The rate of pay shall include overtime and allowances, if any, claimed as part of the minimum wage, including but not limited to tipped wages. The bill prohibits an employer from paying a newly hired employee at less than the rate of pay advertised for the employee’s position.6A if a pay differential is based on any other factor other than prohibited wage discrimination.6A if a pay differential is based on any other bona fide factor other than prohibited discrimination, including but not limited to a bona fide factor relating to education, training, or experience. However, this defense shall only apply if the employer demonstrates that the factor is not based on or derived from prohibited wage discrimination, is job related with respect to the position in question, and is consistent with a business necessity. The bill defines “business necessity” as an overriding legitimate business purpose such that the factor relied upon effectively fulfills the business purpose it is supposed to serve. This affirmative defense shall not apply if the employee demonstrates that an alternative business practice exists that would serve the same business purpose without producing the wage differential.6A are not applicable unless one or more of the defenses account for the entire pay differential that is the subject of the claim.6A. EQUAL PAY TASK FORCE. The bill creates an equal pay task force to study the extent of discriminatory wage disparities in the public and private sectors, the factors that cause such disparities, the consequences of such disparities, and actions likely to lead to the elimination and prevention of such disparities. The bill establishes the membership of the task force, including ex officio, nonvoting legislative members. The civil rights commission shall provide staffing services for the task force. The task force shall submit a report regarding its findings and its recommendations regarding potential actions for the elimination and prevention of discriminatory wage disparities to the governor and the general assembly no later than December 18, 2020.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)1

Senate subcommittee

Named February 13, 2019. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§19B.7A

Modifica§216.6A

Cómo funciona el Código2

Cabildeo

8 a favor · 2 en contra · 17 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Similar bills

  • HF 188 Relating to wage discrimination under the Iowa civil rights Act of 1965 and in state contr…
    89th General Assembly · In committee
    Nearly identical
  • SF 139 Relating to wage discrimination under the Iowa civil rights Act of 1965, making penalties …
    89th General Assembly · In committee
    Nearly identical
  • SF 396 Relating to wage discrimination under the Iowa civil rights Act of 1965, making penalties …
    90th General Assembly · In committee
    Nearly identical
  • SF 187 Relating to wage discrimination under the Iowa civil rights Act of 1965 and making penalti…
    91st General Assembly · In committee
    Very similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.