Proyectos de ley › 88.ª Asamblea General

SF 2392Murió al terminar la sesión · 10 de marzo de 2020

Relating to the operation of state government, including the review of state boards, the regulation of professions and occupations, and investigations conducted by state boards, and including effective date provisions

Presentado por el comité State Government del Senado

Temas:State government

La misma legislación: SSB 3142

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado10 de febrero de 2020
  2. Hecho: Subcomité11 de febrero de 2020
  3. Hecho: Comité del Senado20 de febrero de 2020
  4. Hecho: Lo aprueba el Senado10 de marzo de 202030–18
  5. Se detuvo: Comité de la CámaraMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2020 terminó el 14 de junio de 2020, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA Lawmakers will follow new rules when deciding whether to regulate certain jobs or change how professionals are licensed. This includes checking if new regulations are truly necessary to protect the public and ensuring they are not more restrictive than they need to be. Additionally, the state will regularly review the performance and usefulness of various state boards to make sure they are working efficiently. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to the operation of state government, including the review and sunset of state boards and agencies and the regulation of professions. The bill is organized into divisions. DIVISION I —— REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS. The division relates to the regulation of professions. The bill requires a legislative committee reviewing legislation to impose regulations on a health profession that is not currently subject to regulation by the state to verify that: the unregulated practice of the profession will clearly harm or endanger the public, the public will benefit from assurances of professional ability, and the public cannot be effectively protected in a more cost-efficient manner. The legislative committee must then verify that the legislation is the least restrictive method of regulation to protect the public. After completing its review, the bill requires the committee to submit its findings to the president of the senate and speaker of the house of representatives, who shall make the findings available to each member of the general assembly. The bill requires a member of the general assembly introducing legislation to regulate an unregulated health profession to submit a report, prepared by the legislative services agency, with the legislation addressing why the regulation is necessary, the efforts that have been made to address the problem, the alternatives considered, the benefits and harms to the public from regulation, the maintenance of professional standards, and shall include a description of the profession proposed for regulation and the expected costs of regulation. The report shall be submitted to the president of the senate and the speaker of the house of representatives, and shall be made publicly available on the internet site of the general assembly. The bill requires a member of the general assembly introducing legislation to expand the scope of practice of a regulated health profession to submit a report, prepared by the legislative services agency, addressing why the expanded scope of practice is beneficial, whether practitioners currently have or will be required to obtain training because of the expanded scope of practice, whether the new practice is currently tested by a nationally recognized examination, the extent to which the expanded scope of practice will impact the practice of professionals currently in the state or who relocate to the state, the costs or savings from the expanded scope of practice, relevant laws in other states, and any recommendations from regulatory entities. The report shall be submitted to the president of the senate and the speaker of the house of representatives, and shall be made publicly available on the internet site of the general assembly. A legislative committee reviewing such legislation shall consider whether the scope of practice is being expanded only to protect the public, whether the expansion of services will benefit the public, and whether any changes to the entity regulating the profession are necessary. The committee shall not consider competitive implications of expanding the scope of practice. The bill requires a member of the general assembly introducing legislation to impose or increase a continuing education requirement on a health profession to submit evidence of the efficacy of the requirement to the president of the senate and the speaker of the house of representatives. The evidence shall also be made publicly available on the internet site of the general assembly. The bill requires a legislative committee reviewing legislation to impose a regulation on an unregulated nonhealth profession to consider whether the unregulated practice of the profession can clearly harm the public, whether the benefits of regulation clearly exceeds the costs imposed on consumers, and whether the public needs assurances of professional ability. If the committee finds in the affirmative with respect to the preceding factors, the committee shall examine data to find evidence of actual harm to the public related to the unregulated nonhealth profession being considered for regulation. If the committee finds that regulation is necessary, the committee shall review the legislation to determine whether it is the least restrictive regulation necessary to protect the public and that it is not being imposed to protect a profession from economic competition. The committee shall submit its findings to the president of the senate and the speaker of the house of representatives, who shall make the findings available to each member of the general assembly. The bill requires a member of the general assembly introducing legislation to regulate an unregulated nonhealth profession to submit a report, prepared by the legislative services agency, addressing why regulation is necessary, the efforts made to address the problem, the alternatives considered, the benefits and harm to the public, the maintenance of professional standards, the professional groups proposed for regulation, and the expected costs of regulation. DIVISION II —— STATE BOARD REVIEWS. This division relates to the review of state boards. The bill requires the state government efficiency review committee to review the usefulness, performance, and efficacy of the board. The legislative services agency shall create a schedule, which the committee may revise, for review of approximately one-fifth of all boards each calendar year between the year 2021 and the year 2026. The bill removes duties of the state government efficiency review committee not related to the review of boards. A board that is subject to review shall submit a report to the committee prior to the date the board is scheduled for a sunset review that includes certain information specified in the bill, and shall bear the burden of demonstrating a continued public need for its existence. The bill provides several factors for the committee to consider. After completing a review, the committee shall prepare a report of its findings and recommendations, which report may include findings and recommendations for more than one board. The committee shall present its findings to the general assembly in the form of a bill. The committee shall include with its recommendations an explanation of the benefits of implementing the recommendations. The division does not restrict the general assembly from taking any other action with respect to regulating boards. The division creates principles for the imposition of professional regulations. The principles created by the bill include a policy of enacting the least restrictive regulation necessary to protect the public, encouraging economic opportunities and competition, providing guidance for determining what style of regulation is appropriate, and enforcing an occupational regulation against an individual only to the extent that it is explicitly provided for by a statute. The bill does not prohibit a licensing board from requiring licensees to obtain credentials from private organizations. The bill enacts a rule of construction that any law of a political subdivision regulating a profession that is not regulated by the state shall be preempted if it is inconsistent with the principles expressed in the bill. DIVISION III —— ACCOUNTABLE GOVERNMENT ACT REPORTS. The division relates to accountable government Act reports submitted by agencies. The bill requires such reports to include descriptions of how the agency has improved efficiency, modernized processes, eliminated duplication and outdated processes, reduced costs, increased accountability, expanded the use of technology, and incorporated productivity improvement measures. This portion of the report shall be submitted to the state government committee of both chambers of the general assembly and posted publicly on the internet site of the general assembly. DIVISION IV —— PROFESSIONAL LICENSING BOARD INVESTIGATIONS. This division relates to investigations by professional licensing boards. The bill strikes the provision that a determination by a licensing board that an investigation is not warranted or should be closed without a disciplinary hearing is not subject to judicial review. However, the bill requires a board that determines that no probable cause exists for an asserted violation to return the complaint asserting the violation to the complainant with a statement specifying the reasons for rejection of the complaint. DIVISION V —— ADMINISTRATIVE RULES REVIEW COMMITTEE REVIEW OF ENTRY REGULATIONS. This division requires the administrative rules review committee (ARRC), when reviewing an entry regulation, to consider certain factors specified in the bill. The bill defines “entry regulation” as any rule adopted pursuant to Code chapter 17A by a licensing board for the purpose of regulating an occupational or professional group, including but not limited to any rule prescribing qualifications or requirements for a person’s entry into, or continued participation in, any business, trade, profession, or occupation in this state. The bill provides that the ARRC shall not give deference to a statement or interpretation made by a licensing board regarding an entry regulation, statute, or other legal authority when considering the factors. If the ARRC disapproves of an entry regulation after consideration of the factors provided in the bill, the ARRC may take any action on the rule otherwise permitted to the ARRC. The bill requires each licensing board to submit to the ARRC no later than December 31, 2020, a list of all entry regulations adopted by the board that are in effect as of the date of submission. The bill requires the ARRC to review all submitted entry regulations by December 31, 2024, and to establish and update a schedule for such review. The schedule shall be posted on the general assembly’s internet site by the legislative services agency. The bill requires that an entry regulation be designated as such in the preamble to the entry regulation, beginning with the July 29, 2020, Iowa administrative bulletin. DIVISION VI —— EFFECTIVE DATE. The bill takes effect upon enactment.

Cambiado después por las enmiendas S-5054, S-5053; vea Enmiendas.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)2

House subcommittee

Named March 11, 2020. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§17A.35§272C.12§272C.13§272C.14§272C.15§272C.16§272C.17§272C.18§4A.2§4A.3§4A.5§4A.6§4A.7§4C.1§4C.2§4C.3

Modifica§2.69§272C.3§8E.210

Cómo funciona el Código3

Cabildeo

0 a favor · 9 en contra · 38 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Similar bills

  • SSB 1046 SSB 1046
    89th General Assembly · Renumbered as SF 487
    Very similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.