Bills › 88th General Assembly

SF 2374Died when the session ended · March 10, 2020

Relating to restitution ordered in a criminal proceeding, court debt, and civil claims for reimbursement against inmates, and including effective date provisions

Sponsored by the Senate Judiciary Committee

Topics:Courts & civil lawCrime & corrections

Same legislation: SF 2244

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 12, 2020
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 13, 2020
  3. Done: Senate committeeFebruary 24, 2020
  4. Done: Passes the SenateMarch 10, 202032–16
  5. Stopped: House committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
  6. Next: Passes the House
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The 2020 session adjourned on June 14, 2020, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill relates to restitution ordered in a criminal proceeding and court debt.7 from inclusion in restitution ordered by the court. The bill allows a county or municipality to file a claim for reimbursement of the jail fees in a separate civil action rather than as a restitution claim in the underlying criminal case. The bill waives the filing fees for such civil actions.8107. The bill changes the definition of court debt to mean all restitution, fees, and forfeited bail.108(6) (correctional).

Read the full explanation

If a payment is made on a court debt and a case number is not identified, the bill requires the clerk to apply the payment to pecuniary damages in other criminal cases in priority order from the oldest judgment to the most recent judgment, before applying payments to other court debt.8107(4)(a) (county attorney collection of court debt). The bill modifies the definition of restitution and creates category “A” restitution and category “B” restitution. The bill defines “restitution” to mean pecuniary damages, category “A” restitution, and category “B” restitution. Category “A” restitution means fines, penalties, and surcharges.2(13)(b), court costs, court-appointed attorney fees, including the expense of a public defender, and payments to medical assistance programs for expenditures paid on behalf of the victim resulting from the offender’s criminal activities.7 (jail fees), and the ability of the offender to perform a public service in lieu of paying jail fees or court-appointed expenses when the offender cannot reasonably pay such fees and expenses. The bill defines “financial affidavit” in Code chapter 910 (restitution) to mean a sworn affidavit by the offender about the current financial information of the offender in order to assist the sentencing court and department of corrections to make a better determination about the offender’s ability to pay category “B” restitution. The bill defines “restitution plan of payment” and “plan of payment” as having the same meaning, and defines “permanent restitution order”, “plan of restitution”, and “temporary restitution order”.2 relating to restitution or community service ordered by a sentencing court. The bill and current law require that any pecuniary damages be paid by the offender to the victim. The bill requires category “A” restitution be paid without regard to an offender’s reasonable ability to make payments. The bill requires category “B” restitution be paid subject to an offender’s reasonable ability to make payments. The bill provides that when an offender is not reasonably able to pay category “B” restitution, the court may require the offender to perform community service for a needed public service for that portion of category “B” restitution the offender is not able to reasonably pay. If community service is ordered in lieu of payment of court-appointed attorney fees, the court, when setting the specific number of hours to be performed by the offender to pay for such fees, shall determine the value of hours of community service by approximating the equivalent value of public defender expenses.2A relating to an offender’s reasonable ability to make category “B” restitution payments. The bill creates a presumption that an offender has a reasonable ability to make category “B” restitution payments. The bill establishes a judicial process to determine if an offender has a reasonable ability to pay the full amount of such restitution. If an offender requests that the court determine the amount of category “B” restitution payments the offender is reasonably able to make, the court shall hold a hearing and make such a determination. At the hearing, the burden is on the offender to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the offender is unable to reasonably make payments toward the full amount of category “B” restitution. The offender is required to file a financial affidavit at the hearing.7. The bill specifies that a court that makes a determination at the hearing is presumed to have properly exercised discretion, and the court is not required to state the court’s reasons for making the determination.3 relating to the court’s determination of the amount of restitution. The bill permits a statement of a victim’s pecuniary damages to be filed within a reasonable time after the prosecuting attorney is notified by the victim of any pecuniary damages incurred. Under current law, the pecuniary damages statement by the victim is required to be filed within days of the sentencing.7.4 requires the offender’s probation officer to forward to the department of corrections all known information concerning the offender’s plan of restitution. If an offender’s financial circumstances change, the bill requires the supervising agency of the offender to submit a new restitution plan of payment to the sentencing court. The bill permits the prosecuting attorney to petition the court on any matter related to an offender’s restitution as long as the offender is on probation, parole, or incarcerated. The bill provides that a plan of payment shall be based on all information pertinent to the offender’s reasonable ability to pay, and the first monthly payment under such a plan shall be made within days of the approval of the plan.7.9(3) specifies that category “A” restitution and category “B” restitution shall not be paid by the clerk of the district court until all pecuniary damages to victims have been paid in full. The bill directs the supreme court to adopt rules prescribing the form and content of the financial affidavit.

Changed since by amendment S-5073; see Amendments.

Full bill text1

House subcommittee

Named March 11, 2020. Meeting: Thursday, March 12 · 9:30 AM · House Lounge.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Fiscal note

AI summary This bill changes how jail fees, court debt, and restitution are defined and collected. It is estimated to increase annual costs for the Judicial Branch by approximately $65,000 due to an increase in small claims filings. The bill will also result in one-time training costs for the Judicial Branch, and it may have a negative fiscal impact on the general fund budgets of counties and municipalities because jail fees may become more difficult to collect.2

Read the fiscal note

Description

Senate File 2374 relates to restitution ordered in a criminal proceeding and court debt. The Bill makes several changes related to jail fees assessed under Iowa Code section 356.7, the collection of court debt under Iowa Code section 602.8107, and restitution under Iowa Code chapter 910.

Jail Fees

Senate File 2374 removes jail fees assessed against a defendant under Iowa Code section 356.7 from restitution ordered by the court. The Bill allows a county or municipality to file a claim for reimbursement of the jail fees in a separate civil action rather than as a claim in the underlying criminal case. The Bill waives the filing fees for such civil actions.

Court Debt

Senate File 2374 makes changes to the collection of court debt under Iowa Code section 602.8107. The Bill changes the definition of court debt to mean all restitution, fees, and forfeited bail. The Bill also excludes jail and correctional fees assessed under Iowa Code sections 356.7 and 904.108(6) from the definition of court debt and removes them from the payment priority order under Iowa Code section 602.8107(2)(c). The Bill substitutes the phrase “victim restitution” with “pecuniary damages as defined in section 910.1” in Iowa Code section 602.8107(4)(a).

Restitution

Senate File 2374 modifies the definition of restitution and creates category A and category B restitution. The Bill defines “restitution” under Iowa Code section 910.1 to mean pecuniary damages, category A restitution, and category B restitution.

Category A restitution is defined as fines, penalties, and surcharges. Category B restitution contains most other current restitution categories including:

  • The contribution of funds to a local anticrime organization that provided assistance to law enforcement in an offender’s case.
  • The payment of crime victim compensation program reimbursements.
  • Payment of restitution to public agencies pursuant to Iowa Code section 321J.2(13)(b).
  • Court costs.
  • Court-appointed attorney fees, including the expense of a public defender.
  • Payments to medical assistance programs for expenditures paid on behalf of the victim resulting from the offender’s criminal activities.

Senate File 2374 makes several other modifications to Iowa Code chapter 910:

  • Iowa Code section 910.2 — Removes and replaces the section relating to restitution or community service ordered by a sentencing court. The Bill requires pecuniary damages and category A restitution to be paid in full and category B restitution to be paid subject to an offender’s reasonable ability to make payments. If the offender is not reasonably able to pay category B restitution, the court may require the offender to perform community service.
  • Iowa Code section 910.2A — Creates a new Iowa Code section relating to an offender’s reasonable ability to make category B restitution payments. The Bill creates a presumption that an offender has a reasonable ability to make category B restitution payments and establishes a judicial process to determine if an offender has a reasonable ability to pay the full amount of such restitution.
  • Iowa Code section 910.3 — Makes changes relating to the court’s determination of the amount of restitution and the issuance of temporary and permanent restitution orders.
  • Iowa Code section 910.4 — Makes changes relating to payment plans as a condition of probation.
  • Iowa Code section 910.7 — Specifies that the appellate court shall not review or modify an offender’s plan of restitution or review any other issue related to an offender’s restitution unless the offender has exhausted all remedies under Iowa Code section 910.7.

Background

Jail Fees

Under Iowa Code section 356.7, the county sheriff, or a municipality operating a temporary municipal holding facility or jail, may charge a prisoner who is 18 years of age or older and has been convicted of a criminal offense for the actual administrative costs relating to the arrest and booking of that prisoner. The average daily cost is determined by the county and varies across the State. Funds collected by the sheriff or municipality are credited to the county general fund or the city general fund.

The fee is currently assessed and collected as part of criminal restitution under Iowa Code chapter 910 and is subject to the offender’s reasonable ability to pay. The Bill removes this fee from restitution and allows the fee to be collected through a civil action.

Court Debt

Currently under Iowa Code section 602.8107, court debt is defined as all fines, penalties, court costs, fees, forfeited bail, surcharges under Iowa Code chapter 911, victim restitution, court-appointed attorney fees or expenses of a public defender ordered pursuant to Iowa Code section 815.9, or jail or correctional fees charged pursuant to Iowa Code section 356.7 or 904.108. The Bill removes the fees charged under Iowa Code sections 356.7 and 904.108 from this definition. The correctional fees under Iowa Code section 904.108 are not currently collected by the Department of Corrections. This “pay for stay” fee is currently assessed as a 6.0% sales tax on items in the commissary.

Restitution

The current definition of restitution under Iowa Code section 910.1(4) is the payment of pecuniary damages to a victim in an amount and in the manner provided by the offender’s plan of restitution. Restitution includes all items listed under the category A and category B restitution categories within this Bill and the jail fees assessed under Iowa Code section 356.7. Currently under Iowa Code section 910.2(1), there are two categories of restitution. The items in the first category are restitution to the victims of the offender’s criminal activities and to the clerk of court for fines, penalties and surcharges. The court is required to order restitution for the items in this first category regardless of the offender’s reasonable ability to pay.1 The second category includes all items in category B of this Bill, plus the jail fees assessed under Iowa Code section 356.7. The court can only order restitution for items in this second 1 State v. Albright, 925 N.W.2d 144 (Iowa 2019).

category to the extent the offender has the reasonable ability to pay. If the court finds an offender is not reasonably able to pay all or part of the items in the second category, the court may order community service in lieu of restitution under the terms and conditions set forth in the Iowa Code.2

Assumptions

  • The average amount of jail fees assessed and collected will remain the same in future fiscal years.
  • The modifications to the collection of the jail fees assessed pursuant to Iowa Code section 356.7 will create a substantial increase in the filing of small claims cases. The calculations assume 1,000 new small claims cases.
  • The new criminal court debt collection processes will require at least a two-hour training program for most clerk of court staff. It is assumed there will be training for 500 staff at an average cost of $34.62/hour per person.
  • The new criminal court debt collection processes will require at least a one-hour training program for all judges prior to the implementation of the new law. It is assumed there will be training for 185 judges at an average cost of $108/hour per judge.
  • The trainer preparation for the training for the clerks will require four hours for each group.

Fiscal Impact

Counties and Municipalities

Senate File 2374 is estimated to have a negative fiscal impact on the general fund budgets of the counties and municipalities that collect the jail fees assessed under Iowa Code section 356.7. It is difficult to determine the total impact due to the fact that the fee would still be permitted, but would be required to be collected as part of a separate civil judgment rather than within the underlying criminal proceeding. As a result, the fee would be subject to a different collection system since it would no longer be considered restitution or court debt, and therefore the fee may be more difficult to assess and collect.

In FY 2019, there was a total of $21.9 million assessed and $4.1 million collected in jail fees from all 99 counties. The average total amount collected from all 99 counties over the last three fiscal years was $3.9 million. Table 1 shows the five counties with the highest and lowest collections of these fees in FY 2019.

2 Id.

Table 1 — FY 2019 Jail Fee Assessments and Collections Counties with Highest and Lowest Collections3

Judicial Branch

Senate File 2374 is estimated to have a fiscal impact to Judicial Branch operations. Requiring the jail fee to be collected through a civil judgment rather than the criminal proceeding is estimated to create a substantial increase in small claims cases, although it is unclear how many new small claims cases will be filed. In CY 2019, there were 86,808 small claims filings. Assuming an average filing increase of 1,000 cases (1.0% increase), this provision is estimated to result in an annual cost increase of approximately $65,000. Table 2 provides the annual additional cost to the Judicial Branch from the increase in small claims filings. Table 2 — SF 2374 Estimated Additional Annual Costs

Small Claims Caseload Increase

The modifications made in SF 2374 to the court debt collection system and restitution categories are estimated to have a one-time cost to Judicial Branch operations. Table 3 outlines the estimated cost to the Judicial Branch from the changes made by SF 2374. The one-time costs are the result of the training that would be required for staff and judges for the new collection system.

3 There were several counties that did not assess jail fees in FY 2019: Buchanan, Crawford, Davis, Dubuque, Grundy, Iowa, Keokuk, and Page. Some of these counties still collected previously assessed fees in FY 2019: Buchanan ($26,089), Davis ($158), Dubuque ($259), Grundy ($50), and Page ($4,784).County FY 19 Assessed FY 19 Collected Polk 9,156,650$ 1,570,303$ Highest Linn 1,896,950 351,509 Woodbury 730,620 251,405 Black Hawk 420,564 248,187 Dallas 429,741 86,836 Allamakee 450$ 0$ Lowest Johnson 30 0 Franklin 350 0 Grundy 0 50 Davis 0 158Required Staff

Average

Time/Case

Average

Cost/Hr

Additional

Caseload

Annual Cost

Increase

Magistrate 24 min $58.23 1,000 23,292$ Clerk of Court 72 min $34.62 1,000 41,544 Total 64,836$ Table 3 — Estimated One-Time Costs of SF 2374 In summary, the estimated overall cost of SF 2374 to the Judicial Branch in the first year would be approximately $120,000, and $65,000 in the second year and beyond.

Additional Impacts

Senate File 2374 creates category A and B restitution, but does not make any changes to the items subject to the ability-to-pay consideration under current law (other than the jail fees assessed under Iowa Code section 356.7). As a result, these modifications are not estimated to have an impact on the assessment or collection of those items listed under category A and B restitution in this Bill.

The Bill also removes correctional fees under Iowa Code section 904.108 from the definition of court debt under Iowa Code section 602.8107. These fees are not currently collected by the Department of Corrections (DOC). This “pay for stay” fee is currently assessed as a 6.0% sales tax on items in the commissary. Therefore, the provision removing correctional fees from the definition of court debt would not have an impact on the DOC.

Sources

  • Judicial Branch
  • Department of Corrections
  • LSA analysis

Reading a fiscal note3

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§910.2A

Amends§356.7§602.8105§602.8107§909.3§910.1§910.2§910.3§910.4§910.6§910.7§910.9

How the Code works4

Lobbying

3 for · 1 against · 17 undecided · Who →

Family tree