Proyectos de ley › 88.ª Asamblea General
Relating to wage discrimination under the Iowa civil rights Act of 1965, making penalties applicable, and establishing an equal pay task force
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado24 de enero de 2019
- Hecho: Subcomité12 de febrero de 2019
- Se detuvo: Comité del SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2020 terminó el 14 de junio de 2020, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
La explicación oficial está en inglés; todavía no hay resumen en palabras sencillas.
This bill relates to wage discrimination under Code chapter 216, the Iowa civil rights Act of 1965, and establishes an equal pay task force. WAGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT.6A. Penalty and remedial provisions for discriminatory employment practices, including penalties specific to wage discrimination, are applicable under Code chapter 216 to violations of these requirements. The bill prohibits an employer from requiring that an employee refrain from disclosing, discussing, or sharing information about the amount of the employee’s wages, benefits, or other compensation or from inquiring, discussing, or sharing information about any other employee’s wages, benefits, or other compensation as a condition of employment.
Lea la explicación completa
The bill prohibits an employer from requiring that an employee sign a waiver or other document that requires an employee to refrain from engaging in any of those activities as a condition of employment. The bill prohibits an employer from discriminating or retaliating against an employee for engaging in any of the activities. The bill prohibits an employer from seeking salary history information from a potential employee as a condition of a job interview or employment. This provision shall not be construed to prohibit a prospective employer from asking a prospective employee what salary level the prospective employee would require in order to accept a job. The bill prohibits an employer from releasing the salary history of any current or former employee to any prospective employer in response to a request as part of an interview or hiring process without written authorization from such current or former employee.6A if a pay differential is based on any other factor other than prohibited wage discrimination.6A if a pay differential is based on any other bona fide factor other than prohibited discrimination, including but not limited to a bona fide factor relating to education, training, or experience. However, this defense shall only apply if the employer demonstrates that the factor is not based on or derived from prohibited wage discrimination, is job related with respect to the position in question, and is consistent with a business necessity. The bill defines “business necessity” as an overriding legitimate business purpose such that the factor relied upon effectively fulfills the business purpose it is supposed to serve. This affirmative defense shall not apply if the employee demonstrates that an alternative business practice exists that would serve the same business purpose without producing the wage differential.6A are not applicable unless one or more of the defenses account for the entire pay differential that is the subject of the claim. EQUAL PAY TASK FORCE. The bill creates an equal pay task force to study the extent of discriminatory wage disparities in the public and private sectors, the factors that cause such disparities, the consequences of such disparities, and actions likely to lead to the elimination and prevention of such disparities. The bill establishes the membership of the task force, including ex officio, nonvoting legislative members. The department of workforce development shall provide staffing services for the task force. The task force shall submit a report regarding its findings and its recommendations regarding potential actions for the elimination and prevention of discriminatory wage disparities to the governor and the general assembly no later than December 18, 2020.
Senate subcommittee
Named February 12, 2019. It hasn’t reported yet.
- Sen. Jason Schultz REmail
- Sen. Jim Carlin R
- Sen. T. Taylor
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Modifica§216.6A
Cabildeo
8 a favor · 2 en contra · 17 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
88th General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Similar bills
- HF 188 Relating to wage discrimination under the Iowa civil rights Act of 1965 and in state contr…89th General Assembly · In committeeNearly identical
- SF 139 Relating to wage discrimination under the Iowa civil rights Act of 1965, making penalties …89th General Assembly · In committeeNearly identical
- SF 396 Relating to wage discrimination under the Iowa civil rights Act of 1965, making penalties …90th General Assembly · In committeeNearly identical
- SF 187 Relating to wage discrimination under the Iowa civil rights Act of 1965 and making penalti…91st General Assembly · In committeeVery similar
Matched by wording or an identical title.