Bills › 88th General Assembly

SF 219Died when the session ended · February 7, 2019

Relating to an intercollegiate basketball scheduling requirement for institutions of higher learning under the control of the state board of regents

Topics:K–12 educationHigher education

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 7, 2019
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 11, 2019
  3. Stopped: Senate committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
  4. Next: Passes the Senate
  5. Next: House committee
  6. Next: Passes the House
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The 2020 session adjourned on June 14, 2020, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill directs the state board of regents to require the regents universities and their athletic departments to schedule intercollegiate basketball games against each other at least once annually during the regular intercollegiate sports calendar, with each university arena hosting on an alternating basis. Failure to meet the scheduling requirement will result in a reduction in the amount appropriated to the board and allocated to the institution under the institution’s general university line item equivalent to the total amount paid by the institution’s athletic department to recruit teams with an appearance fee or revenue guarantee exchanged for travel to play in a game hosted by the institution and its athletic department.

Read the full explanation

If an athletic department fails to meet the scheduling requirement, the board is directed to submit the necessary budget information to the fiscal services division of the legislative services agency and to the department of management.

Full bill text1

Senate subcommittee

Named February 18, 2019. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§262.9

How the Code works2

Lobbying

0 for · 0 against · 1 undecided · Who →